Members asafi Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 Reminding me the huge ret-conning of Carl Williams going missing for 7 years - and we only find this out on 1998.. Carl disappeared and had been gone eight years before Paul and Christine convinced Mary to have him declared legally dead. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soaplovers Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 The Carl/Mary/ruth story was well written and utterly realistic. You can tell Alden was in charge because St Christine was called to task for not telling Paul what she was doing...even with Nina telling her to be honest. It was oh so satisfying to have Christine have to admit she was wrong..to Nina (a wonderful scene) and to Paul. It's a shame that was the last story for Mary where she was given material that made her more than an interfering mother or mother in law. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Broderick Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 I never understood why they opted to write Mary Williams as such a "cartoon meddler" from 1999 onward. Yes, it was sometimes funny in small doses, but Carolyn Conwell was MORE than capable of playing a fully developed, well-rounded character who tended to be overly zealous about nosing into her children's lives. The Mary we see in the old clips from the early 1980s was certainly "overly involved" in her children's lives, but she was also a likeable and well developed character. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members FrenchFan Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 Oh do you know which clip number is this ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Broderick Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 I think it's the final "60" and "61a". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members FrenchFan Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 thanks found it ! So Julianna McCarthy’s last contract airdate was between July and October 1984. She was still listed as recurring in a January 1985 episode. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Broderick Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 Yes, it appears that she recurred sporadically (without a contract) from late summer/early autumn of 1984 to early 1985, and then she just vanished without a trace, without a mention, in a puff of smoke. We found out in 1986 that she'd been living in London with Snapper and Chris during her "missing period". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members FrenchFan Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 I love Bill Bell but I can’t understand why he often wrote out characters (specifically important ones such as Stuart or Liz) by dropping them like that. It always made me cringe. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Broderick Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 One of the STRANGEST aspects of Stuart and Liz's "disappearances" was the uncertainty of what happened with their reconciliation, or lack thereof. When Liz reappeared briefly in about 2003 to kick-off the "Jill was adopted" storyline, Julianna McCarthy was listed in the credits once or twice as "Liz Brooks" and once or twice as "Elizabeth Foster', indicating that not even the current head writers (Kay Alden and Jack Smith) remembered what had happened between Stuart and Liz, lol. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members YRBB Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 God DAMN was Cash Cashman a beautiful man. Too bad he dies just as the collection of clips begins. Wouldn't mind seeing his routine Please register in order to view this content Lorie is everything. A goddess. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members trainman Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 Lorie went out on top. Too bad she didn't stay longer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members yrfan1983 Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 Yea he is definitely gone by mid-83 because Mark Tapscott is not in the credits. I don't think Earl gets a goodbye mention in the synopses. The last thing I remember is that Earl moved back from Katherine's into Allison's hotel suite for a month as kind of a "last try" before Allison granted the divorce. I'm sure there must have been some dialogue at some point about Earl returning to San Francisco. Bottom line, IMO, Earl was a boring character so he got shipped off. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members will81 Posted August 24, 2020 Members Share Posted August 24, 2020 That's what makes her 2002 return so insulting to the character. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soaplovers Posted August 25, 2020 Members Share Posted August 25, 2020 Seeing Ashley in clips pre Victor, I often don't get why Bill bell insisted on ruining and degrading Ashley's character with the Victor pairing? Nikki being drawn to Victor made sense based on the 2.5 years of story pre dating her meeting Victor....but I just could never buy Ashley being drawn to him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members YRfan23 Posted August 25, 2020 Members Share Posted August 25, 2020 I noticed he wasn't in the credits. I guess he and Katherine must have called it quits too offscreen if we are to assume he went back to San Francisco. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.