Jump to content

DAYS: Behind the Scenes, Articles/Photos


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I don’t remember her talking about how she got Towering Inferno, but she stated that after the movie came out and was a hit, she went to NY to meet with the head of NBC and tell them that she wanted a chance to get some prime time guest spots. But not much came of this and when DOOL went to 60 min, she was done. She felt that the production pace for a 60-minute daily show was not conducive to good performances. She did six weeks of the hour shows as a transition and then she left.

I think three things prevented her from going further at the time: she was known to be outspoken (and women weren’t supposed to be outspoken back then), age (she was 36 when she left, and roles start drying up for actresses at 40), and homophobia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In November 2009, Emmy winner Susan Flannery (Stephanie, B&B) shared in an exclusive interview with We Love Soaps what her thoughts were on the change to the hour format on DAYS OF OUR LIVES: "I said to them, 'I’m glad I’m leaving. It’s so rushed that you’re no longer in control of your performance. And that doesn’t make me happy.' So I did the first six weeks when the show launched for an hour. That’s the reason I agreed to do BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL [a half-hour show]. I like that form. That was Bill's favorite form too. He hated the hour. He thought they had to pad too much story."- We Love Soaps Net

Well, that, the latter, would've sucked. But, it could have been.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually enjoy flashbacks (within reason), if they allow us to see important scenes again (or for the the first time if we missed them during their initial broadcasts).

It took Bill and Laura Horton YEARS to get married on DAYS, and fans had been clamoring to see it for so long, I was not surprised to see a flashback to the wedding a few months after it had originally taken place. I WAS surprised, however, that the show televised the ENTIRE WEDDING act in its entirity during the flashback. It took up a huge chunk of that new episode. 

UGH, no, you really don't. ROTF! When AW first went to an hour, there was a long, loooooooong scene between Steve Frame and Angie, discussing ordering a supply of chairs for a warehouse. Yikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Understandable, about Susan Flannery preferring to do 30 minute shows over 60 minutes ones. It still must have really sucked though, that after years of Bill/Laura/Mickey and keeping Mike's paternity a secret that it wasn't her playing Laura when the secret finally came out. 

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I obviously liked the flashback in that episode because it was new to me, but it just seemed so long lol. I guess it gave MC a break for the day.  He had about 6 lines the entire episode.  Like you said, I don't mind flashbacks, but it's the length.  Only about 1/2 that episode was new material.  Anyhow, I sound like an ungrateful person who is criticizing an episode that is rare and I am so glad I could watch it.

I watched that AW scene mentioned about change/breaking a $10 and not only was it padding, but it was awkward padding.  You could tell the actors were uncomfortable with it too.  I can't imagine how bad the padding was in a 90 min episode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wasn't it 8 yrs till the reveal? That number is stuck in my head. Not surprising that there would be some change in the players.

I was just re-reading about that time in the book Ken Corday put out back in the day. Actually that's not true. I was reading my blog of that book. And, even at that remove, my paraphrase - of Corday's writing (or whomever was ghosting if he had one) - of Bill Bell's storytelling, and it's just so heightened, complex but understandable, and elegantly stated.

If anyone wants to read the text I just referred to, lemme know & I will PM it to you. It's all typed up so it's easy. I feel like these episodes were my secret initiation into a society of soap farers.

Edited by Tonksadora
Offer of text.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
EPISODE # 3407: THE AFTERMATH OF JULIE GETTING BURNED:
 
Here's the rest of # 3407:
 

Please register in order to view this content

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I checked to see when Towering Infermo was filmed (it started being filmed in early May 1974). Then looking at the monthly charts, her only big break was no episodes from June 22-July 3, 1974, so that's the 12-day time frame when she probably filmed her scenes for the movie.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TBH, I hated how Susan Flannery's character in "The Towering Inferno" was killed off.  She basically burned to death in just her shirt and panties after an assignation with her married lover.  Even JER would have objected, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's worse in The Glass Inferno. In that book, Dan and Lorie are more pathetic. He makes trophies and other promotional materials and she's a never-was model. In the movie, they got some dignity, borrowed from The Tower and a pair of cut characters. An opposites attract pairing between a conservative-minded politican and a liberal woman, who are doomed because there's no way they're going to safely get out of the building in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Robert Wagner and Susan Flannery's deaths in The Towering Inferno always traumatized me. They were such nice people and they die very brutally. It's one of those classic childhood trauma movie moments, lol. All the great disaster movies have at least one of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And then there was Jennifer Jones, whose poor character (Fred Astaire's love interest) was killed trying to protect some children from falling out of the glass elevator after another explosion.  That one traumatized me as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

        What you NOT gonna do to me!
    • Bravo to every single person responsible for today's episode. From the writer on down to Kraft services. Yall I'm getting emotional but I wish my granny was here to have seen this soap since she was the one to introduce me to this medium.    

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Everything is fraught with confusion. Why is Leslie pleading with the Duprees to accept Eva? She's not biological family so what is this? She's the product of an affair with their in-law so Leslie wants them to accept her? I'm getting GOOD TIMES vibes of Leslie and Eva minus the physical abuse.
    • Big fan of today's writing. In particular, I like EJ complexity, crying over Johnny and conspiring at the same is tough to pull off in the same episode, but it goes very far in explaining EJ's motives. I don't hate the idea of Cat and EJ, and I especially appreciate everyone trying to warn her, but she is sticking to the plan. Boy oh boy, when Brandon Beemer wears a shirt that matches his eyes, I get lost in the screen!
    • Yeah, I think that Leslie's speech would have had a bit more of an impact if Ted had been the Dupree's son, with Nicole being the daughter in law they loved like a daughter. But being that he's the son in law, and that Eva (at least not right now) isn't technically a Dupree, it doesn't hold as much weight. They aren't caring much for Ted right now and their feelings could be trickling down to Eva. Though, I do think they have some sympathy for her. I really enjoyed today's show. Loved a stripped, down hurt but still strong in her resolve Nicole. DD continues to shine and shows why she is IMO the heart of the show. I felt her words, and anger at Ted and how she broke down in Kat's arms at the end. She is just wonderful all the way around. I also loved the way that Anita read Leslie. She was spot on about her and how mishandled everything with Ted and Eva. And speaking of Leslie... I immediately thought the same thing once I saw that scene. That what she exhibited was trash behavior. I don't think she's a good mother. In fact, I think she's lousy. Granted, I have missed some episodes, but I haven't really seen her do anything to indicate that she really cares for Eva or her well being. All she's really done is try and manipulate/use Eva for her own agenda since she came to town.   
    • I thought Brandon C was much more believable as Martin today.  Before, I watched an actor trying to portray a character.  Friday and today, I simply felt the character.
    • The way Leslie uses her love shower Eva with and then snatches it away when Eva doesn’t do what she wants is something that should be focused on down the road.    Great end to the episode overall and kudos to the writing and production team for carefully executing all of this. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Leslie used her and then threw her out! She truly is evil and aint ish   LOVE that Kat showed up for her
    • Please register in order to view this content

      date: Monday, May 5 | Christopher Dunn, Lynn Martin | Anthony Pascarelli Dana is certifiably insane. Beyond insane. And I oop... Anita is about to pop off on her, and this is where it gets good. Oh God, Deadbeat, stop while you're ahead. You are not one to talk with how you treat your husband and children. Settle. Go on, Nicole. Tell Theodore exactly who his busted ass is. Not Dana comparing herself to those she's compared herself to. Damn, Katherine is really putting Eva beyond the bottom of her shoe with her insults. Savage, but deserved, because she called out Eva the first day. She knew, and not a single person believed her. Oh, Theodore, how dare you try and play yourself on the same level as Nicole; it's completely different. Mama Anita is up to bat, and she's going to come out swinging. And she delivered it to Dana in the way only the matriarch of a family could. Nicole kicking Theodore out "day by day" is everything. She's not taking this anything but day by day. W H E W... Katherine telling Eva she's dead to her. Wow. That's got to cut. Dana locking Eva's ass out and drinking her wine in her robe is the ultimate villain. True villain. Notes: Anyone trying to sell that Brandon Claybon (Martin) has improved in his acting must be lying, because this is laughable and bad. Next up for recast: the role of Martin Richardson. Omg. It's so damn bad. This man cannot act. At all. He's got to GO! Daphnée Duplaix (Nicole) is showing how much she's been missed from daytime. Ambyr Michelle (Eva) once again gave an award-winning performance in her scenes. Outstanding, standout star! The montage with Tamara Tunie (Anita) singing "Amazing Grace" was a brilliant touch to wrap up the episode, and to allow us the ability of moving on on Thursday.
    • That ending was beautifully done. Anita took us to church.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy