Jump to content

AMC: Friday October 22, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I also though that both of their reactions was overboard.I could understand them reacting this way if David had done something that resulted in one of their family members/children dying or if he had raped Angie or one of their children.

Or terrorized/stalked Angie and bad stuff happened as a result of that. Or something along those lines.

IMO it would have made more sense if she had used the "I try to be a good Christian woman line, but I hate, hate hate him" for Tad's Uncle Robert. Who did way worse stuff to her and her family than David did. Or said something about how much she hated what Jesse did for abandoning her and Frankie.

And/or how much she hated that Rebecca had the life that she wanted with Jesse for almost 20 years. Her reacting the way she did yesterday to any of those things would have made more sense than to act that way about David.

But I think their reaction was OTT for what David did. The characters on the show are almost treating David like he was a Michael Cambias/Alexander Cambias Sr. type of villain and I don't think they should be doing that. But according to a lot of them he deserved to die, though I don't think he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I fully agree.

Especially with the fact that David was being treated as some kind of uber villain. He was a manipulator. Get over it. I mean, I understand how they all could be angry and even a little insecure because he was always able to outsmart them -- but then again, half of these hypocrites are idiots. Nevertheless, he saved so many thankless lives in Pine Valley, so the idea that "he deserved to die" in and of itself is a total hypocrisy. A man who saved the lives of many of the assholes in this town.

I love how all the good characters wish death upon people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

this is bigger than the writers or the actors. Frons wants them together so they will be together. McTavish, Pratt, B&E, Kreizman and Donna...doesnt matter who's writing bc as long as both actors are on the show, they will be together as long as Frons has a say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's so much more the story... It involves Frons giving RB what she wanted (working with VI) in order to get her back, and using the new head writers as scapegoats in order for Frons to get what he wanted (Rylee).

amc1022105.jpg

I love how she's blind as a bat, but still got a new weave. :unsure:

And there you have it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It ain't like she put it in herself! :lol: At the risk of going WAY OT, I've wondered from time to time what goes into the wardrobe choices of famous blind musicians who've been blind for all or most of their lives. Like, what do they know from rhinestones and shimmer? :unsure: Just who makes these decisions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
    • Is nobody going to mention the cringefest that is 'Carl Ivati'?
    • I've accepted we'll probably never see any of the Roger/Holly 1976-1978 storyline. Whenever any of Roger/Holly 1979 and 1980 storylines surface, those are must watch as they set in motion everything we saw a decade later.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy