Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Personally, my bet is that the first Jason had been written too harsh for anyone to believe Iva would have any interest in him. I forget exactly what case he was involved in, but I remember him being a huge dick. I doubt Jason would have been retooled if they hadn't decided to give Iva a somewhat happy ending and ship her off. But JasonTheSecond was such a dull wuss, I felt sorry for Iva being stuck with that boring, homely loser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2975

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1718

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Was the case the James Stenbeck murder case for which Paul went on trial?  The one where Jason goes on incessantly about Paul committing a crime of Passion?  Jason was a dick but then again so was Kirk when Iva met him and he even was still a bit of one when she began to fall for him.  In fact, Iva has a bit of a history of falling for dicks as she was also involved with Tad Channing.  

I do agree that Iva was thrown with Jason for a happy ending but I could never figure out why?  Were they just done with Iva and wanted a safe, doughy middle aged man to put her 'out to pasture' with?  Maybe after all that time passed they couldn't get the original guy so just decided to go with a totally different actor and used it as an opportunity to completely change the character?  I still think the original Jason was more interesting (jerk and all) and a helluva lot better looking than the 2nd one.

 

Also, I always wonder why ATWT didn't bring back more marginal characters from the past instead of inventing brand new ones?  I guess the writers were just not as interested in the show's history by then.

Watching now, I can't help but think, instead of characters like Liberty and Janet and Eldridge (or whatever that annoying kid's name was).  I'd have much preferred if they brought Brock's widow and two children to Oakdale.  Maybe Brock's son or daughter blames Emily for taking them away from the family and their father's death and seeks revenge.  Maybe that may have only truly worked had Melanie Smith been in the role but I would've risked it, if only to spare us from the hell that was the Ciccones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had to look it up---it seems Jason was brought on to prosecute Paul for James' death. The bible only listed Jonathan Hogan in the role ('89-'94), which I guess means the first guy wasn't on for very many appearances. (which I still find curious; lots of bit players are listed, both actors who played Ray Tenney are included, and that certainly wasn't a big or significant role)

Kirk was a dick---but he certainly wasn't boring. Hogan recurred for years, but it's not like he had a significant story of his own---all I remember is him being Tom's pipeline to the Crime Commission. It had to be that once they decided to fire Brown, Iva needed a "happy ending", and a reasonable excuse to allow her to take MJ with her.

Don't get me started on the Ciccones. I'm convinced Julie Pinson had photos of someone doin' something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

John Hutton was the 1st actor to play Jason Benedict and he was on during the investigation/pre-trial and the trial and the immediate aftermath.  I'd say at least a dozen or more episodes that he appeared in.  Hutton is on the list of closing credits for the show during Paul's trial.

It seems that he may have taken some time away from the screen (seems as if he did quite a bit of theater) but as of late seems to be currently doing more screen work (he was in Lincoln)  http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0404632/

Perhaps the actor only intended to stay for the length of the Stenbeck trial and couldn't stay for an extended run.  Even as a ruthless dick, I still found Benedict to be more interesting as played by Hutton than he was as played by Hogan.

 

What year was Lisa Brown fired?  Just seems like that was a poor decision.  The character had life left and with good strong writing, could've been made interesting but even Marland had started to rely too much on making Iva remain 'put upon' and unlucky in love.  I found it kind of insulting that she ended up with the doughy faced version of Benedict.

 

I wonder if the actor who played Phillip Lombard, David Cryer (the real life father of actor Jon Cryer) is still acting?  I looked at his Wikipedia page and I thought he'd be much older than he actually is.  Actually, looking at his imdb page, it looks like he has been retired from acting for quite some time.

 

And the actor who played Joe Barlow is still alive also.  He had good chemistry with Eileen Fulton.  Had he been still acting, they could have had a brief story arc where Barlow finally retires from overseeing the crime commission and kindles a relationship with Lisa.  I don't know, it still rubs me the wrong way how they had Lisa ending up alone and just wandering around.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lisa Brown was let go in fall 1993, along with Anne Sward. I do think the character was tired, but getting rid of her altogether was a big mistake. I will always resent that she had to give Aaron up to Holden, who did not give a damn about that child, even preferring to spend time with his girlfriend's son over Aaron, until finally Emma had to put her foot down and tell him to start caring about his son and not just using her as a babysitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was a mistake to let Brown go---but I kind of see where she was written into a corner, even by Marland before he died. Iva was the eternal loser, someone who was practically always forced to do the "right thing" and sacrificed any self-interest she had to promote family peace. It's hard looking back and realizing she never fought for anything for herself. It seems her entire family walked all over her, and she had to smile and put everyone else's happiness ahead of hers. Lily--criminy, that selfish brat eternally played her and Lucinda against each other; Ellie walked off with her man; Holden took the child she'd spent years raising; and Meg married her rapist and got Iva's blessing.

It would have been fun to give Iva a "Barbara" moment, where she says "I don't GAF and I'm not going to take it anymore!" and unleashes her fury on all of Oakdale.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Watch the 1972...

 

I guess there must have been bits of different episodes, as I'm not sure the Paul hospital material fits the timeline?

 

I wish we could see that dream sequence in color. It looks trippy as hell, like something from a late '60s film. 

 

This may be the closest I'll ever get to seeing Jane House as Liz (that was Jane's Liz, right?), even though we barely actually see her. I had never seen Peggy, so it's nice to know more about her. Lisa Cameron had been on AW for years, right? It's an odd setup, albeit very ATWT of the golden years, that Dan was married, in love with another woman, and had a third woman living with him (as nanny), clearly feeling something for him.

 

I was thrown by the conversation with Peggy and Ellen about childrearing techniques, complete with talking about leaving Emily alone for an hour a day because kids need to learn to be alone (true enough, but I wonder if that helps foment Emily's many...issues). I wonder if this was part of the attempt at new and modern points of view Irna was trying to inject into ATWT, along with stuff like Tom and Carol being green and having an organic farm, or whatever. 

 

I was almost as shocked as poor Ellen when, amidst the usual "working mother" argument (at least they didn't act like Susan was a bad mother, which was a pleasant surprise) Dan all but said he and Susan had an open marriage and he didn't care what she did. And then Ellen connects it to her own past and reminds him of the pain she suffered as a child. He then throws his own childhood pain in her face. The whole thing was a bit more raw than I was expecting, especially for ATWT. I wonder if this type of attitude helped alienate some of the more conservative fans. 

 

And Susan - I never thought I'd see Marie Masters in this era. She really isn't that different from later Susan. I thought she was going to be nastier, for some reason. But I thought that guy was impotent? He didn't seem to have any problem in that area in this episode...

 

Susan is such a fascinating, modern character, even just here. I'm so glad that she kept magically being saved from the soap scrap heap by various regimes. 

 

Does that Baxter guy end up leaving with Peggy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Finally managed to stay awake through that 1980...

 

That had to be Margo's first episode, right? Great to get to see that. And between Veleka Gray Lyla (never thought I'd get to see her) and an overdose of Cricket, I can't wait to see Mitch's thoughts. I'll always prefer Anne Sward of course, but I do see how jarring the recast must have been. Veleka is grittier, and also quite beautiful in an older, hard-road-of-life way. Cricket...just cliche after cliche. She's a very sensual woman, but she comes across older than she should be, and her acting is straight out of porn. And that "sexy dance" - one of the very few moments of hilarity in a dull 40 minutes. I love Kim's not-so-subtle bitching about Cricket. And this episode just underscores my point about the dull younger ladies on the show compared to the vets - Kathryn Hays is so gorgeous here. Eileen Fulton probably would have been too - I guess this was when she had the hepatitis (I think it was hepatitis). Was that Betsy von Furstenburg temping for Eileen? 

 

Was this before or after Melinda died?

 

I didn't know Sheila was still around by this point. 

 

I had to laugh at Dee being shocked as John very very mildly flirts with nurses. Does anyone know who was playing the other two nurses?

 

The bit with Ellen and David talking about buying John off is so stilted (it's almost like a parody of a spy movie), as is Nick's big speech about trusting love, or whatever. And pervy weird Brad - just ugh. 

 

What a wonderful ONE scene with Nancy.

 

I guess this was the first of 500 random thugs and baddies to pop into Oakdale to go after James. Well at least the ending had a bit of juice to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • “Gender is who you are, and sexuality is who you want.” — C.N. Lester, “Trans Like Me: A Journey for All of Us” St. Pete bridge lit for Pride

      Please register in order to view this content

    • In case it is of interest to anyone here, I have digital copies (computer files, mp4 etc.) of all of the episodes. And, besides having the files they are all up on my usual video hosting site, acct name: shallotpeel, channel it is in: Primetime Soaps and file names like  Flamingo Road S1E15 Hurricane Flamingo Road was a primetime soap on NBC by Lorimar Productions. 2 seasons. 1980-1982. Morgan Fairchild, Barbara Rush. Developed by Rita Lakin.   
    • Arguably DAYS OF OUR LIVES has been brilliant lately & definitely was last week. But, here I am with nitpick & technicalities. This was the only misstep but it was just a stupid thing that should have been caught. Deidre Hall as Marlena has this one problematic line, "It didn't matter how many identities you had, I always knew exactly who you were, you were the man who saved my life." - Marlena, DAYS, 6-2-25 Unfortunately the flashback closest to it was when Marlena was on the phone, terrified because she thought he was Stefano. Yes, it's true that the line is not accurate. There were many times when she did not feel the way she is claiming because of whatever was going on in story with his 'retconned to hell & back' identity & origin story. Does it keep the whole week from being called excellent? Nope.  
    • The Vault has been down all night.
    • Notable: Glendale is not exactly a progressive enclave.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Newsom is a craven opportunist, but his comments today were exactly how better people need to handle Trump.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I decided this primetime soap deserved it's own thread as the Primetime soaps thread is very cluttered and why shouldn't NBC's Lorimar soap mot have a chance to shine? In doing a deeper dive into the second season ratings I was surprised to see that FR actually had an uptick in the ratings when NBC moved it to 9pm Tuesdays beginning March 82. I'd always assumed this move was a desperate one as NBC were running short of programming and had given up on the show,deciding to let the final episodes play out and be hammered by 3's Company  and CBS Movie. But the numbers paint a different story. In it's 10pm slot up against Hart to Hart, which regularly finished in the Top 20, FL premiered in 53rd place and placed in the 40's and 50's as the season continued. But come January 82 the numbers surged a little now moving into the 40's hitting #43 in Feb. Hart to Hart was #11 Then in March Bret Maverick was moved to 8pm with FR @9. First week 16th March FR #47 15.1/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Not great but #2 in it's timeslot March 23 FR #44 15.6/25 3's Company #4 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #33 So even with a stronger movie on CBS FR's numbers went up. March 30 FR #31 16.6/26 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #56 Best rating/position yet Tues April 6 pre empted Tues April 14 FR #36 16.0/26 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #11 CBS Movie #59 Maintaining previous week's numbers Tues April 21 FR #33 15.6/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Numbers down a little (reflecting general spring downturn) but best ranking of the season so far Tues April 28 FR #35 15.1/23 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #6 CBS Movie #42 Tues May 4 FR #27 15.2/24 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #4 CBS Movie #41 Season finale and highest position of the season. Looking at those numbers I wonder why NBC cancelled the show? They had very few hits and here was a show that was holding it's own and moving up in the rankings in a tougher timeslot. And being a serial, the storylines could continue to build the following season. And I'm sure the desirable W18-49 demo was good. Some might argue that CBS were shower weaker movies, but even so, soap viewers are pretty loyal. I guess Grant Tinker arrived at NBC and wanted a classier look but there was room for FR on the schedule. I mean, the following season Knight Rider,Powers of Matthew Star and the A Team arrived so there was still room for more populist fare. Flamingo could have stayed at 9pm-the replacement Gavilan bombed (surely FR would have done better} or moved back to 10pm. The following Jan NBC had a hit with A Team Tues 8pm. Had Flamingo followed it, it might have really taken off. As it was they tried Bare Essence, which flopped. Oh well,it was not to be...    
    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy