Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Reading through the posts from the last couple of days (I haven't watched the newly posted clips/episodes yet but I always find I don't enjoy random episodes. I need to see things in context of the bigger picture to truly appreciate it.) one of the things I've seen on this board many times is the love for Bianca. 

Since 2017, watching everything that exists from '86 to '00 (where I am now) I personally don't get it. That character seemed so out of place and just didn't work as part of the canvas of ATWT. I remember she'd be gone for long stretches of time and then she'd show up and I'd think, "Oh man, I thought that character was surely gone by now."

I can 100% understand why no writer ever brought her back. She was useless. She had no storyline. She was just someone Lucinda could talk to. I guess I feel about her the way everyone else seems to feel about Katie. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2970

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1716

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Con Roche (Rick) always sounded like a fake stage name. When you Google him only ATWT and 1 film are his only credits. There is very little info about this actor on the net.

Gary Hudson is one of those actors who is always working, but never really had a long term role. Most of his parts were in that bland pretty boy mold like Ted McGinley and Lyle Waggoner. Cameron Mathison would also fit into that category. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had no idea that Margo McKenna also did a stint on ATWT until as well. I assume that this was after EON, right? Did she pop up on any soaps after this? 

As more clips emerge, it is so odd to see Peter Reckell in a role other than Bo. I am interested to see what his feelings and memories were while on ATWT. I hope someone presents the recent clips to him and we get commentary from him. 

I am glad that clips of Rick Ryan are starting to appear to. He has always been one of the many ATWT characters that I've wanted to see clips emerge. I will always stand firm that during the Sheffer years, Hunt Block should've been cast as the dastardly Rick Ryan instead of Craig. The same stories they had Hunt played could've still been played with him as Rick, but instead of him marrying Babs, he would've simply been her brother. And instead of making Babs go off the deep end, Babs could've been a pariah for simply covering for her brother's heinous acts. That would've also prevented Craig's character growth from being assassinated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hunt would have made much more sense as Rick.

This was after her EON run. 

I wonder if he's ever talked about his ATWT work. Maybe some interviews in his early years at DAYS? I don't know. I guess hardcore Peter fans might know more.

I put up a few clips of him a while back.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Poor ATWT suffered from all the changes in the early mid 80's.

They had more headwriters in that 5 year period 80-85 than in the first 25 years!

All the more important to have a clear vision of who and what this show was about.

Instead each set of writers made changes (not necessarily improvements) that ripped away at the foundation.

It was good to see David and Ellen getting airtime but that amnesia trope was a cop out.

Why not have David have that breakdown, leave town and meet Cynthia (or whoever) who follows him back to Oakdale. Much more realistic. 

And while David was away, Don Hughes returns and gets involved with Ellen. Don and Ellen had a friendship from Day  1 of the show and she almost married him. So using the past to provide story.

And maybe use on of Don's stepdaughters (Alice /Debbie)as a new 30 something character character?

Like days did with Alice, Nancy should have still been used and given involvement in the story.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Those are great ideas. The show wrote Don into something of a corner but they could have easily tried. They just gave up, I guess because they thought he was too old. I'm surprised sometimes that P&G allowed the focus on David and Ellen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It shocked me that Helen Wagner and Don McLaughlin were dropped from contract status in the early 1980s (one of the all-time most bone-headed moves on daytime TV), so I was always expecting David and Ellen to be shoved off the back-burner as well. In the end, I am surprised that Patricia Bruder made it all the way to 1996, considering how little Ellen had to do in her final years on the series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm really surprised too. I can see why Marland kept her on even though he seemed to struggle writing for the Stewart family. However, I think it's a downright miracle that she lasted a few years after he was gone with the subsequent writers who seemed to have zero respect for the history of the show. It was a crime that she was let go but I guess by that point it just didn't make sense to have her around. If I remember correctly, at the end of her run, she was just hanging around with Susan, a woman who she hated. David, Paul and Dan were dead, Annie, Dee and Betsy were MIA and Emily was busy running around Oakdale being histrionic and had ceased to be a real, relatable person. The Stewarts were decimated much like the Matthews of AW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is the first time I've ever seen a clip of Zsa Zsa on ATWT. I recall reading that she refused to play a mother (despite having an adult daughter in real life), so they had to cast her as Miranda's sister. I hope more of her scenes pop up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy