Jump to content

Dallas 2.0: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I wouldn't go that far.

I liked it a LOT more than I expected to, especially since I thought Cynthia Cidre's only other attempt writing a soap, Cane, was a mess despite a good cast, and had heard the grumbles aboput creator David Jacob's offer to be a consultant being rejected. That's not to say I loved it, or am even half confident it won't lose interest quickly, we'll see.

It DOES feel a lot like a simple continuation of the show, as if it had never left, rather than a reboot (I admit I was expecting something as disastrous as Melrose Place's reboot, despite the fact that even in its last years Dallas always had a better core). I admit I was a bit disappointed by the wedding cameos--will we see more of Lucy at least? (Or her Knots Landing parents, not that they ever paid much attention to her...)

My main problem is the young cast. They're awfully pretty, and also kinda bland. They're decent actors (well aside from Jesse Metcalf, who at least isn't trying to play a bad boy), but I am still a bit worried about a bait and switch with, after a few episodes, nearly all of the drama revolving around them with just cameos of the three former stars--particularly given Hagman's health and the fact that Linda Gray has hinted at not being featured as much as she thought she would. But, we'll see. It's nice to have a full on, irony-free, primetime soap again (though Revenge filled some of that niche for me), even if Dallas ranks third out of my 80s primetime soap list (Knots being first, then Dynasty, though Dynasty fell apart worse than Dallas, then Dallas and then Falcon Crest, in case anyone cared).

The critical reaction has been surprisingly strong too, though nearly everyone seems to think the yougn cast needs to get more interesting (I think one problem is, true to most modern youth soaps, they just are so pretty--so was the original Dallas cast but they also had more distinctive and different looks from one actor to another, not so homogonized).

Ent Weekly this week had a nice oral history/interview about Dallas in the past, how awful the TV movies were (which are largely being ignored), etc. I didn't know Victoria Principal ostracized herself so much from anything, and anyone Dallas, or that Hagman spent every single day drunk (at least tipsy) until 1995 when he had liver issues. Of course I never watched Dallas "live" until its final year and had to catch up with the TNN reruns.

Oh, and I didn't hear any whimsical music either--thank god. (Even on a show I *loved*, Herskovitz/Zwick's Once and Again, I cringed at Snuffy Walden's "cutesy" musical cues he'd do for some of the lighter scenes which, without the music, would have been fine).

Oh, I also enjoyed the opening credits (though I wondered why they got rid of cast photos), and even the closing credits werer in nice retro yellow on black (this may have only been here in Canada where it's shown on Bravo--no relation to the US Bravo--, I am guessing TNT may have had the usual cutaway end credits).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They're not even that pretty - I have a tough time looking at most of them. I guess they're Hollywood pretty, but they're "attractive" in the same way the Ford brothers were.

I didn't watch the second TV movie but I didn't think the first one was that bad. It's not like most of Dallas was superbly written.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Loves me some hot shirtless men, but I have to agree. They just don't do it at all. Their lack of charisma and Metcalf's corpse like acting takes away from the looks some say they have. Shirtless Christopher did nothing for me! Nice body, but I needed someone else's head on his shoulders. It's severely ridiculous casting! Ford? I'd turn lesbian before I ever allowed myself to salivate over his ass!

He'd been drinking that long? With who's liver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He had a liver transplant in the 90s--didn't he? I thinkt he article said that... But yeah, they talked about how he'd have "soft" booze (it sounds like Champagne was his tipple of choice lol) in the morning until he felt that "click" as he called it (which I think is a reference to Brick in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof who talked about needing to drink till he felt the "click") and then he would do his thing--never slurring or missing lines on set, so nobody really intervened.

No, you're right, Dallas rarley had brilliant dialogue or anything. I saw the tv movies when they aired but remember nothing, and didn't know the show well enough back then.

I agree they're not pretty--what I meant is they sorta fit into the boring, safe, homogenized version of TV pretty we so often get now. Interchangeable. That's what I meant--the original cast was attractive as well, but in a more interesting way, but this has become more and more of a problem with TV in general.

Agreed, though I haven't yet read anyone claim the writing ws spectacular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a real mistake, because the whole point of the original Dallas, with the Ewing brothers, was that Bobby was the perfect son, the handsome god. Gary was damaged. JR was desperate and insecure and very charming. You don't have those dynamics when the leads are putty-faced mannequins. What this blandness means is there is no reason to care about any of the new characters, because they are all the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Watching the very first eppy, and while I'd like to see Ken Kercheval, I'm not looking forward to punk ass Cliff. He was such a loser. We were supposed to feel bad for him after he'd start something with JR and lose. Those were the good ole days!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dallas had some great writing in the early years.

"I am Tokopa!"

the scene where Aunt Lil Trotter recounted what happened to Mickey

"JR, we don't make love anymore!"

Digger selling Pam for $100

Clayton falling for Sue-Ellen and silently being crushed because he was so old she had no idea

Jock's first wife Amanda thinking Bobby was Jock

Cliff buying and candy for Rebecca

Solid writing episode in and episode out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I enjoyed it quite a bit.

There are a few false notes, notably Jesse Metcalf and whoever the bland actress is whose playing his wife...Metcalf is just so weak and fake and terrible in every role he does. There are scores of actors who would have done better in the role, although it takes a lot of charisma to take a 'good guy' character places. See Duffy, Patrick. He wrote the book on it.

I like Jordana Brewster and Josh Henderson, I buy them as 'Pam' and 'JR' like characters.

Wonderful to see Duffy, Linda Gray and Larry Hagman back. Gray looks phenomenal and if she's underused this season, that is a major error on the part of Cynthia Cidre, not that I'm surprised. Hagman is the star of the show for obvious reasons, his performance was terrific, especially as JR came out of his catatonic state, Hagman's face came alive.

The emphasis should be on the established Dallas vets and more of them should return...the chemistry that Hagman, Duffy and Gray have can't be faked and created overnight, something Cidre should have realised in terms of the younger cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Cidre & Co. were smart, they'd kill off Christopher toward the end of the season, and use that as a launch pad for Victoria Principal's return. I mean, just imagine: the last shot of the season, before hiatus, and it's Pam (after we pan up, of course), standing over her son's fresh grave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • The sad thing about SC being a great actor is that his character has never worked. Ever. And yes if I don't know what Liam is about and just focus on acting... I can appreciate him. But as soon as I connect him to Liam... I cringe.  Maybe SC should run till he is still young and find himself a role where he can shine. 
    • As I've said before I don't believe the fact that both sisters have cheating husbands (one in the past, one more recently) is a coincidence or anything random. It's pre-thought and pre-planned and the message is clear. Cheaters can be found in all shapes, forms and sizes. Some do it in the most blatant way, they are known serial cheaters and their wives know of their past hook ups (as Dani has already said... she was willing to forgive Bill for his previous mistresses... till Hayley came) and some are more masterfully disguised in the image of the perfect husband. The fact that Dani was jealous of her sister Nicole's happy marriage in the first episodes was not a coincidence. I knew it the first second I heard it. It made me wonder and think what is beneath Nicole and Ted's picture perfect life. The show painted two very different sisters and then gave them the same crisis. It was intentional and dramatically focused on how these women acted after that... How they kept or did not keep their dignity. The contrasts and the similarities are not random. They connected the two stories very well. Telling us that beyond the gates there are secrets... lies and betrayals. And sometimes the happiest ones have the biggest skeletons in their closets. Is all of this a cliche? A soap opera serial cliche? Yes. Does it still work? Yes. And did we need to start with something that is more universal and easier to stomach by the mass audience? Yes. This is only the beginning of the show in terms of stories and themes. We will have years ahead of us to explore different aspects of these people. The first couple of months it had to be a classic sex and betrayal story that makes more people hooked. It's universal. Again. Nothing so far about both husbands being cheaters is coincidental for me. It's too early for that.
    • Thanks, these are great! Joanne Curtis, another soap character punished for having an abortion
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Yes!!! Mona feels  like one of my aunts, love the way she carries herself. Loved seeing Eva pop-up at the gambling place.  Monday was all around good soap. Can't remember the last time an entire episode held my interest.  Loving the fallout and reverberations from Ted and Shea-Butter Sheila's affair

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Tricia Mann Grant is 90s early 2000s quality FINE. As nice as it would've been to see Anita embrace Eva, I'm glad she didn't because we can squeeze a lot more years of conflict out of Eva, Leslie and the Duprees.   Lauren & Sheila, Viki & Dorian, Katherine & Jill all gave us good conflict for decades. Hopefully this follows suit. I understand the concern. Right now there's an issue of quality of black representation on shows more so than quantity of black shows. I'd like to see more predominantly black sci-fi, legal, political, supernatural or medical dramas over the typical who is sleeping with who. However, this is a soap, and this is what happens on soaps. White soap characters do these things all the time, but have the luxury of being seen as individuals, not representations of their entire race. Husbands/fathers like Todd Manning, Victor Newman and Asa Buchanan cheat, lie and swindle all the time but aren't seen as a commentary on white men. Black characters like Ted and New Dollar Bill should be able to do the same.
    • And that area of the DMV has a high-end glamorous casino the MGM National Harbor. 
    • Even under the new writers, Jamey episodes are the shortest and the weakest A lot of people were unnecessarily clowny and bitchy today. There was a lot of fluff and filler too. And the dialogue was a little… ehhh as well. But welcome back, Kevin! It’s been a long time lol his return still seems really random but I don’t mind it. Philip’s actions make sense to me based on everything that’s happened to him lately and it could possibly set up more tension between him and Xander/Alex. And I wouldn’t mind seeing him and Kevin team up. I thought the actor did a good job too. Too bad that they couldn’t get Robert Benvenisti back though. I didn’t realize it in 2001 but he was hot

      Please register in order to view this content

      And, we got the word that Arianna wants to come home. I’m looking forward to that, and seeing her relationships with Gabi, Marlena, etc. on display and I hope that 

      Please register in order to view this content

      As for Rachel’s birthday party… was Days hinting at something that we’ve been speculating about since EJ was shot?
    • Fireplace in same location in both homes, but Lulu has bookcase instead of door to another room May 13, 2025

      Please register in order to view this content

      ^screengrabs from Video clip of May 13 Lulu/Carly scene at Lulu's house video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9DtlZ3el6w   April 1, 2015
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy