Jump to content

DAYS: Discussion for month of August


Recommended Posts

  • Members

But Phillip could be simply lying. He is Kiriakis, he could be saying the right things to appease Chloe and at the same time take action to prevent the bad outcome. I´m not sure if he really loves Melanie so much, but he certainly doesn´t want lose her to Nathan and he seems to have no intention to reunite with Chloe. He could have a child with Mel on his own very soon, so maybe he is not so interested in paying aliments and doing weekly visits.

And Carly and Chloe became something like a friends lately. She could see first hand how much Chloe regrets what happened and how much Daniel loves her. And she was nearly caught in many of the lies she helped Chloe with, so she is not just unconcerned observer anymore, she has a lot to lose as well. Her relationship with Mel is finally on a good terms and she and Daniel are good friends as well. Even when she doesn´t know who is the guy Chloe slept with, Mel would never forgive her how much she hurt Daniel. Maybe she finally realized one little lie is better than make so many people miserable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

All the way around, Daniel makes the best choice. Carly/Chloe will never see it coming, Melanie will discover that her father is trying to protect her heart ('cause he's sweet that way), Victor can rest assured that Danny isn't the village idiot after all, and fans in general will be able to applaud that someone really is 'home' at Dr. Dan's.

And.... best of all. When we have Bope shoved down our throats again and Carly is single, she and Dan can come together as people who both tried to protect those they love. Daniel won't be a "lied to" party in this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really, nobody but sami/ej/stefano/kate/will should have been at Samis wedding.

It would be so odd and fake if anyone else was there, as if they were only there to see this revelation, and there is no need for them to see that. Who would it be? Caroline & Roman? I am sorry, they are relevant and matter how? All we would get is a o told you so lecture from them. As for everyone else, ari/gabi/chad/etc are not even sami or ej's friends and as for brady, he would never go and support sami in this, esp when hes a drunk.

It was what it should have been. I do like big over the top soapy revelations, when they fit. it just didnt fit here. I would love it if on Victor & Maggies first big offical date, if we ever get there lol, they showed up somewhere where everyone was so the town could gossip about maggie for a change, lol.

Days is very, very slowly turning around. I actually am really into this carly/daniel/chloe/philip/mel/nate/steph thing. sami/rafe/ej is about to turn around, maggie/victor/vivian is great, drunk brady is fun, my only issue is just hope and ari sucking really. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

In today's episode, Daniel said he did it to make Chloe happy. We're not seeing real emotions here. Dude finds out that his fiance is pregnant with someone else's kid and all he can think about is Chloe's happiness? Huh? Same thing with Melanie (if she did it) - she finds out her husband is having a kid with her dad's fiance and yet she's all "everything's fine." Where's the anger? With Carly, she's Daniel's friend, who has said since day 1 that if the baby is Philip's, she will tell Daniel. But now she changes her mind. And also as a friend, she would let him raise someone else's kid? Also, there's the technological issue. What we saw in the back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back scenes yesterday means they switched the paternity results at the same time? It's not possible for all 5 of them to think that they switched. 4 of them would've had the same thing happened to Stephanie - they would've saw that someone switched it before they did. And again, the dialogue and scenes that I watched for the past couple of months doesn't match the motivations of each other switching the results. There has been no subtext or hint of them thinking that. It seems like this "Who Dun It?" came out of nowhere and was put together so quickly and that's why it rings false to me. It was probably one of Corday's mandate to change things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obviously not all of them tried to change the results at the same time as not all of them even know about it. Chloe and Melanie shouldnt even be of consideration considering they had no access to do that. Really its between Philip and Carly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Everything about Daniel/Chloe/Melanie/Philip/Carly is just confusing to me so I'm just going to forget about it and wait to see what happens LOL! I do suddenly find all of them, including Nathan and Stephanie, very interesting now! This story has really taken a turn, there's an element of excitement to it all now...

Nathan was acting just a little mysterious, am I seeing things?? What was the point of that little 10 second scene with Stephanie sleeping on his shoulder and he had that mystique look on his face? Also that scene where that hot doctor (she was really hot lol) was flirting with him at the hospital earlier?? He seemed like he was hiding something. That's just what I thought, could be totally off base LOL...

Sami/EJ/Rafe wasn't bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Saw the switch coming a mile away but I think it's inventive & a fresh spin on the Who's ur daddy? tale. Frankly, IMO, it's the most innovative spin on a paternity storyline since Sheila spinning Ridge & Eric's samples for Bridget's test & nobody really knowing if the results were right (they weren't). I'm more than willing to let this play out before I make judgement. But I DEFINITELY don't think this twist was thrown together- they've clearly been building to something like this for months. Why else would they rope in so many characters and have so many couples' happiness depend on the results of this test? I'm just glad the constant tennis game that has been Carly & Chloe actually is turning into something pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It definitely wasn't thrown together at the last minute. I realize whipping TPTB at any soap is the most acceptable form of prejudice we have today, but they aren't stupid people. Add in the fact that this was taped at least 2 months ago, long before any reaction was gathered from the fans, and you can see that there is a very definite plan there.

Every single "suspect" has means, motive and opportunity. Do they have cause or know they have cause? That's the real question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing I like about DAYS right now is that, while some stories do drag on and some seem downright boring, the payoffs to all of them lately have been fantastic and I really like that they're playing most of the beats of the fallout. This Sami/EJ/Rafe/Nicole/Brady stuff is hot today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Oh everyone saw the switch coming a mile away and yes I do agree that the idea of a "Who Dun It?" paternity switch is pretty good. My complaint is about the logistics of this storyline - how it differs from what the characters have been doing/saying for the past couple of months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

It's killing me too but in a good way. I approve of how this is being stretched out....it's slowly being revealed. It reminds me a lot Reilly stretching out episodes. :)

So Vivian wants to bury Maggie alive? I don't mind the idea of redoing 'buried alive' but the emotional connection is not there with Vivian/Maggie like it was with Vivian/Carly. There's just no depth with Vivian/Maggie. If they're doing a Reilly storyline, why not ask me to consult. :P:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
    • I initially read this as Marilyn Manson and did a double take.  Thanks for the screen grabs. The outfits are horrible. Somehow Victoria's Miss Piggy dress is the best. Ashley looks like a French madam bent on revenge, and Abby looks like she hot glued lace scraps to her garbage bag.
    • LOL...I do have the vaguest of memories of Katherine driving her and Phillip Sr to his death. But I don't recall Katherine being as over-the-top as Reva. Surprisingly, I don't even think Brenda Dickinson's Jill was---although lord knows Brenda probably is a real-life Reva. I have read the recaps of earlier Roger, and it surprised me that he doesn't love Holly. He had an affair with Hillary (SHOCK, I tell you, SHOCK when I read that one) while married to her.  Thanks to the cast turnover, other than Jerry and Maureen Garrett, there wasn't anyone else he had worked with, that I can recall. It would've been interesting if Mart Hulswit had still been in the role of Ed, how much more they might've let Ed/Roger clash. I really do have a soft spot in my heart for Krista's Mindy.
    • San Bernardino Sun, 21 July 1981 Soap gets a new lease on life By TOM JORY Associated Press NEW YORK (AP) NBC's Texas premiered Aug. 4, 1980, in the toughest time slot in daytime TV opposite top rated General Hospital on ABC and CBS' enduring -Guiding Light As recently as the first of this year, " Texas appeared doomed, a victim of barely measurable ratings. All that has changed, and the show approaches its first anniversary with a new executive producer, a new team of writers, a new look and a new slant on life. Even the ratings have improved a bit, from 14 percent to l5 percent of the audience in the time period in November and December to 15 percent to 16 percent today. "We have Houston like Ryan's Hope has New York City," says Gail Kobe who took over Texas as executive supervising producer in March,"and we feel a real tie with that city. We've got to reflect in the show what's happening in that real town, and I think we're doing that." It was a significant step, taking Texas- its roots in the fictional Bay City of NBC's Another World -to a real-life setting. "I don't think it's got to be  the kind of place that people can't can't find on the map," says Ms. Kobe "I think the audience in daytime is more prepared for reality today." It meant giving the show a recognizable Houston backdrop, a more contemporary sound -country and western performers like Ray Price will appear periodically and a lighting system that would clearly represent the hot, bright Texas sunlight. . Texas faced difficult odds from the start, the competition and the inevitable comparison with CBS' prime-time superhit, Dallas, notwithstanding. There was the problem of introducing a multiplicity of characters, many of them imports from Another World, as well as a story line, in an hour-long format. "It was the first show to start at an hour," says Kobe, a former actress who had been supervising producer for Procter & Gamble Productions, which owns Texas and five other daytime shows. "It's very difficult to fill that much time with a large cast, and not leave the viewer confused. "With a daily show, you have to let the audience know who to root for," she says. ''And if you're trying to begin a story, too, no one's going to keep track." The changes began even before Kobe took the show from Paul Rauch, who had faced the seemingly impossible task of producing both Texas and Another World simultaneously. Beverlee McKinsey, whose generally unpleasant character, Iris, had come to Texas from Another World as a young ingenue, was given back her mean streak.  "She had become a sweet woman,"Kobe says, "and the audience was used to seeing her do terrible things. It just didn't work." In addition, she says, time was spent establishing the identities of the characters. Joyce and Bill Corrington, who had created the show with Rauch, were replaced as head writers in February by Dorothy Purser and Samuel Ratcliffe.  
    • 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived at CBS. I pointed out 1995/96 Murder, She Wrote as sabotage in the Tank Jobs and Sabotage thread.  
    • I think Flannery did some great work, but I always found Stephanie's underlying hypocrisy off-putting. And while I don't think KKL's the world's best actress (I completely understood why she's received so little attention from the academy for her work), I do think that her appeal as Brooke was responsible for a lot of B&B's success.
    • FROM THE VAULT: DAYTIME TV SPECIALS: 1/1/73-12/31/73: A complete list of all rated Daytime TV Specials aired in 1973: Note: Not all Watergate sessions were rated.  

      Please register in order to view this content

      EXTENDED DATA: JANUARY 1973-JANUARY 1974 UPDATE FOR ALL SPECIALS SERIES: Here is the update added in to the February 3 post (which already has this info for February 1974-December 1979). The extra details (episode titles and cast) for the special recurring series (and additional data for a few other specials):  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy