Jump to content

July 5-9, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Also Kristina is giving up her plot for revenge and is now moving on hopefully with this new guy. Though the meeting of Taylor was this week. I cant wait for Brendas return and next week looks like a big week with Elizabeth having her baby and some hospital stuff going on. If GH can hold decent ratings like these, the return of Brenda could be really big, probably as big as Sonny shooting Dante. I would be shocked if it did any better than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see either soap seeing their 45th anniversary. OLTL has 3 years till it and AMC has 5 years left. On which one will go first...hmmmm.....ABC has done more to keep AMC on the air than OLTL. So I see OLTL going first.

They are the only ones. CBS lineup went up from Friday's numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If OLTL maintains a 0.2 gap with AMC in women 18-49 (which it has maintained for awhile now, aside from the occasional week like two weeks ago). then AMC will go first. Frons won't have a choice.

You have to remember...when ABC execs see the daytime ratings in the key demo (the only thing they even bother to look at), just about EVERY week, they see Y&R first, GH second, and OLTL third.....and then AMC is way down there at 7th or 8th, after DAYS, B&B, as well as The View, and the second half of Price is Right (that's the way the nets see the results, with ALL daytime shows included, including non-soaps).

So frankly....AMC looks bad....and has for some time.

Move to LA or not, no way does ABC throw away a more advertiser-friendly show just because Brian Frons bet on the wrong horse. They'll find another use for the facility AMC films at in LA; heck, ABC studios can use it for any number of new primetime shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think the network presents the soaps as seperate entities when approaching advertisers more then likey ad are brought in a block time from 1-3 with them deciding when they want there commercials shown and AMC/OLTL are getting probably getting the same amount of money per ad spot so it really makes no difference to the networks it is fans that hang on to boosting rights.

When it comes down to cancelling a soap it doesn't matter what Brian Frons wants it is a network decision and who know what their reasonings may be. The network cares about one thing and that is money which show is making more for them it now seems as if the soaps aren't making money and that means all three soaps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, the ABC shows and Days are all locked in a dead heat for last place come Sept. I don't know what show ABC will cut; however, I'm willing to bet that they somehow 'merge' OLTL and AMC in the hopes of retaining as many veiwers as possible. I could see them keeping AMC but bringing in the kids from OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Y&R can maintain or stay close to current levels, I do not see the show staying on daytime but, instead, ending up on the CW or MY network as a four night a week show. A 3.5HH would be good for the CW and I don't see just one soap floating on an island all by itself surround by talk and game shows. I think the entire genre needs to change timeslots because even a weak show like ATWT could do okay on a busted up mini network. It isn't as if they would need to dump money into production values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ok, say advertisers ARE paying the same amount for each show. What show do you think they would more than likely remove if had to make a choice? The show with more "eyes" in the key demo or the show with less? I think any savvy advertiser would want to pay less for more. JMO!

I would like to add, I think AMC was chosen to move to L.A. because it was the easier of the two to move as far as cast is concerned. I don't see E. Slesak, Robert Woods or H.B. Smith and even Cassie DePaiva up and moving to L.A. Again, JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know but I think the demos for all soaps maybe excluding Y&R are negligible. And I keep hearing tht Y&R's demos are good but a 1.6 compared to a couple of years ago is sad sorry to say. Not only are the shows losing viewers but the viewers that haven't left, many of them baby boomers, are reaching the end of the 18-49 demo. It's happened in broadcast television as well. But 1.2-1.3 compared t o a 1.0-1.1 - is it really that much different. And even Days who really had the biggest uptick last year, how far did the demos go up? Maybe a couple of points? And all these cast returns to all the shows have done what? Days brought back Carly(CC) to the show and has it really mattered. Maybe for a short time. Vanessa Marcil is really the only one who stands a chance to make a diff and I guess time will tell. She may cause a bump for a couple of months like CC did for Days and then it drops again. I think ABC is counting on Marcil helping their entire lineup of shows. I know her return last time caused a rise but did it also help the surrounding shows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just a FYI about Erika Slezak and moving to L.A. if OLTL had. This is from her newsletter around the time of her show's move:

Q: What would you have done if One Life to Live had moved out there?

Slezak: Oh, I would have gone. I like California. It's warm! I know you can fall into the ocean and stuff like that, but it's warm. I would have gone, and besides you don't really have a choice -- when you have a contract, they say you will go wherever the show is produced, and I understand that. You know they have to do it that way, and that is OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could not see ABC salvaging the one group that has damaged OLTL more than anything else - teens and teen-driven subplots. More than once, even the teen demo has chosen OLTL as the absolute last thing they would watch. The teens and Todd/John/Rex excesses are the parts of OLTL I would leave behind because of their continuing underperformance and negative impact on OLTL's identity. In the end, I doubt they will cherry-pick from one show to save the remaining two. They will maintain their separate identities to their respective ends. But that's JMO.

I have a question about ABC's 20-episode cut to save money. It's being discussed like it's a done deal. Did the WGA accept ABC's change to their signed agreement? I was under the impression they only just found out about it in a gossip column.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks for the well-detailed reply. I'm fairly early in my viewing, so I have some time before it goes nuts. Thanks a lot! @kalbir and @DRW50 thank you so much. I am just approaching 100 episodes, so I'm good for now. 
    • The Duprees as the main family isn't the problem, but the fact is that over 3/4 of the cast are Duprees.. so it limits coupling potential and also keeps the canvas too closed in. Too many female Duprees and no hetero, nor gay, male Duprees is also a problem.   I also agree with @DemetriKanethat the male characters are one note, and not very layered/interesting... outside of Bill, that is. To me, I would have focused on either Nicole's family and dynamics or Dani's family and dynamics instead of trying to introduce/develop both families at the same time.  Nicole's family is more developed and interesting with loads of storyline possiblities then Dani's family right now. And because MVJ and co decided to feature so many Duprees... we're less likely to be free of any outside characters like Ashley/Derek since they're the non-Dupree part of the canvas.
    • BTG: A B&B: B DAYS: B+ GH: A- Y&R: C-
    • I can not see Kat as a police officer and do not want that for her. Thats not her passion nor does she care about that stuff. The stuff with Eva and Leslie is specific to her life and wanting to protect her family. Her "detective" skills have more to do with her business background, which makes her very analytical and pay close attention to details. If this show had a corporation, she'd make a shrewed businesswoman and CEO I definitely dont want to see her sleep with her cousin's husband. That would be too much of a Hayley redux which ironically you dont want with the Sharon/Hayley theory
    • I would make Jan, Ashley's mom, Anita and Vernon's maid. It would lock in to why Leslie would choose to befriend both her and Mona. It also gives Ashley a connection to the Duprees and explains how she befriended Naomi. I would have had Derek start the show as a cop to explain his connection to Jacob. Kat needs to realize that she is MADE to be a detective. Have her go through police training, making the appropriate comments about the uniform along the way. Have her prove she is so much more than a rich princess, even to herself. Then, when Jacob's partner is proven to be dirty, Kat is assigned as Jacob's rookie trainee. At the same time, Naomi does finally get a case she can follow through on. Her client is a person that Jacob arrested. This puts them at odds because Jacob knows this person did it, as does Kat, but Naomi only sees the extenuating circumstances and believes he deserves a lighter sentence and a second chance. THAT is when Jacob will turn to Kat in frustration and she will lose her virginity to him. 
    • This opened my eyes and appeals to my logic. But, don't you also think that the fact that they are so ill-suited means that, by soap-opera-laws, they aren't a long term item?  I like how Belle is written now, so I appreciate the fact that she is in this story.  But, I don't believe anything will become of it, and I think EJ is going to mess it up very soon.  Which explains why I don't get too worked up over it. I'm also suspending my outrage until I see how EJ treats Belle during her mourning.  If he cheats with Cat, then we'll know that he was never meant to be happy.
    • Kristen also raped John post-Paris with a Magic Mirror.  Her pregnancy was "delicate" and they couldn't be intimate.  She had already lost the baby, needed to get pregnant immediately again and set a Stefano tricked out Magic Mirror to hypnotize John and John thought he was  having sex with Marlena.  John woke up the next day and thought it was a dream.
    • The show is only a few months in and still finding it's footing. I'm hoping MVJ has years of story in place for these characters and will pretty much stick to that plan (obviously with tweaking along the way) I do have some issues with the initial structure. Making the Duprees the centerpiece and not having a male with that name. Making Martin Vernon and Anita's would have solved that and made the age of the character more appropriate. I agree about not having a young couple in the beginnings of a romance. And having too many married couples. Jacob and Naomi could be just living together. That makes the possibility of other relationships more viable than within a marriage. Same with Smitty/Martin. Having them married with kids limits the story especially in terms of them as a gay couple.  The white characters existing in another universe is also a problem. That ties in with the workplace/job issues. I don't think they needed the hospital-instead the police station/real estate office or Martin's workplace could have utilized and have Derek/Ashley/Vanessa/Smitty/Shanice etc working and interacting there. ATM too many characters are meeting up in cafes etc-we're not seeing them at work. We needed to see more of how various characters interact eg Jacob/Bill, Ted/Bill. There were a lot of extended family scenes but there should be more one on one to get a sense of character and family dynamics. Leslie is a great character but her bag of tricks is getting over exposed. I would hate that she is kept on and other character's made to look like idiots by accepting her presence. They'll need some good writing and twists to keep her around. We can only hope some of the lesser actors improve as I don't want too many recasts or writeouts. So it's early days and I look forward to seeing the show evolve. And give the Duprees some staff!
    • Thanks. I barely remember any of the backstory there, just his ties to her parents. It was all so convoluted, everything with Tangie.
    • 81 and 82 were rather bad, with the infamous invasion of the Kirkland family. But sometime in late 82 or early 83, Claire Labine was rehired as head-writer and immediately put the focus back on the Ryan's. This time Labine's tenure was short, but she did great work. The entire show was compelling again -- especially the Charlotte Greer storyline (one of the best plots of the entire series).  But Labine was fired, yet again, and Ryan's Bar was bombed, resulting in most of the action being transferred to Greenberg's Deli, and a focus on younger characters with little connection to the Ryan family. So that is what you are probably seeing from 84.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy