Jump to content

AMC: Friday May 28, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They surprisingly had chemistry, I remember that scene under Charles Pratt Jr. they made it seem like Frankie was jealous at some guy touching her while he was at war.. dumb SL btw...anyway he found out it was Scott and went all...oh it's just Scott...laugh.gif I'm thinking more potential here b/c w/ Frankie prbly talking to Madison, Randi will look to do the same and Scott is so gullable that he'll prbly fall for her and Frankie vs Scott might get juicy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Randi would have been perfect as Erica's U/5/dayplayer second assistant, nothing more. Just think about how different our reactions would have been, we'd have made kind comments about Erica's beautiful assistant who was on again today and whatnot, her presence probably would have been met with totally positive fan reaction. We could have seen how she grew (if she grew) from there, but thrusting her right into a frontish burner s/l with Frankie? No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really? :lol: And just to be clear, of course I mean the actress in question, Randi could have turned out differently with someone else in the role. It's funny though, if DV had in fact played a role like I described, we'd have probably been complaining that her role wasn't beefed up. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Meagan on B&B was on the show for years as Brooke's beautiful blonde assistant. She never really did do anything except be a body to stand there for Brooke to talk to and cover up her affairs. Fans liked her nad thought she was so pretty and wanted to see more. She was finally placed on contract but was barely used and barely made an impact. To her credit, she was likeable and was never hated like Randi, probably bc she had the chance to build a fanbase after years fo doing nothing and being a beautiful face in the background. She wasnt thrown into the frontburner mix like with Randi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Chemistry is subjective. I see something with Madison/Frankie. Not crazy, wild, hot "this couple is on fire" chemistry but they work well together IMO. I'm not up to speed on Madison's history with the Hubbards so I guess I need to visit YouTube and I might change my mind after that. But no matter what Randi must be recast and Frankie needs to be FRONTBURNER. I don't care if he's shagging Erica Kane.

As for Scott, he's completely meh to me. I have nothing against the actor but I don't feel anything when he's on screen either. Hopefully that'll change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont think theres anything wrong with Vasi. She was wrong for hte role as they originally envisioned it (tough hooker from the wrong side of the tracks) but fine with for the glammed up Fusion girl she is now. The character just sucks and I dont think she's worth attempting to save. For what? Its not like she has any strong ties to anyone on the show besides Frankie. I saw kill her off and let him move onto someone else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't really see why Miranda would have issues with men just because she was raised by two women. If she did I would think it would have much more to do with her father being a rapist. I would made exploring the whole rapist thing but I don't want some story emphasizing gay issues. They've done more than enough of those and usually did them badly.

I'm surprsied they did not use the move to LA as an opportunity to get rid of Randi but I guess they think Frankie needs a love interest and they are not about to pair him with anyone else already on canvas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Holly's final big story was the Sebastian mess in late 2004.   Vanessa and Matt were promoted to regulars near the end and were heavily recurring prior to that starting around 2007/2008.
    • Keith has a softer presence, but it would have helped to see him be more aggressive or proactive in protecting them instead of standing around like a mannequin. A man the audience should be hoping and wishing gets back together with his wife. Nicole needs a new husband!
    • She needs to learn to be honest with her husband about her lusty interests because being sex positive only works if you're not cheating on your spouse.
    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling. Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
    • It's Men's Mental Health Month.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy