Members MoTheGreat Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 That mean JT would be free to bump uglies with somebody else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 Now you're doing it. Youv'e criticized me on many an occasion for "assuming" things and filling in blanks that weren't in the writing, but we never saw him burn a fetus, nor was it spoken about. It's a great big mystery as to whether he did or not. I myself, assumed he did as well, but I'm used to assuming things... and you say I shouldn't do it, so you shouldn't either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members lovely_m Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 Not necessarily, or at least not right away. JT spent 4 years thinking that Reed was his son and loves him. He's not going to just cast him aside just because he's not his biological son. Well, unless the show needs to make JT into an ass so we feel sorry for the Newmans. I could see JT becoming less involved in Reed's life until it's forgotten that JT was ever considered Reed's biological father. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 So I suppose Ashley dead fetus just went away magically? Adam cleaned up fluid that was expelled for Ashley's body with a towel and bunt it, what else was it supposed to be? Then what happened to the dead fetus? Ashley would have died a long time ago if it were still in her. Again, this isn't assuming. Ashley miscarried that night, and no fetus was removed from her body afterwards. So, Adam had to have gotten rid of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 Yes, that gave me alot of satisfaction as well. I love it when someone pokes a hole in that Newman sense of entitlement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 Some would assume it was blood and amniotic fluid. That's my whole point, it wasn't addressed, he could have buried it in the garden, for all we know. Since you ahve a such an issue with the burning of things,I guess we can assume your'e against cremation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 But that was never referenced or alluded to either, and it would be just as bad as burning it. The fact still remains that he had to be the one that discarded Ashley's fetus, which is quite sickening really. If Ashley and Sharon don't kill his ass at the end of all of this (or at least beat the sh!t out of him), it won't a healthy payoff. These women need to get their dignity back and put this cartoon villain in his place. Only when it happens to a fetus of a woman that never knew she miscarried in the first place... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 Oh, I don't think so.... would you rather buried with flowers growing over you, or burnt in hell's fire? And yes, he got rid of it somehow, but until we know.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 Well, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be alive to know what the hell was done with my body when I'm gone. Yes, he got rid of it somehow with Ashley never knowing, and he's the reason she miscarried in the first place. What did he think was going to happen with gaslighting a pregnant woman walking on a flight of stairs during a blackout? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sylph Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 You need to move this to Potpourri. Toups will go crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeeeDee Posted December 18, 2009 Members Share Posted December 18, 2009 If Victor doesn't drown him first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MoTheGreat Posted December 19, 2009 Members Share Posted December 19, 2009 What does JT bumping uglies got to do with him still being there for Reed. Totally two different things & plus. I think it would be a great story for the guy that plays JT. He cheated on Mac after she had a miscarriage. Got somebody else pregnant then find out later in years that the kid isn't his. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeeeDee Posted December 19, 2009 Members Share Posted December 19, 2009 Not to The Newmans. They would eat him alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MoTheGreat Posted December 19, 2009 Members Share Posted December 19, 2009 [!@#$%^&*] those sluty Newmans. But I was talking about after JT might find out that Reed isn't his because Victor did something to the DNA results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeeeDee Posted December 19, 2009 Members Share Posted December 19, 2009 :lol: :lol: The only thing is that Brad's dead so if Grambo did mess with Reed's paternity results it wouldn't mean anything now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.