Jump to content

What if GH (or any soap) asked for a "do over"


Recommended Posts

  • Members

What if you turned on GH one day and Brian Frons was there to make an announcement. He apologizes for the utter failure that GH has been over the last several years and the wrong decisions made and tells us that he there is a great new writer in charge. However the core of the show has been so decimated that they are going to simply reboot things. This is just a one time thing to restore the shows former glory and they will never test fans loyalty like this again. They aren't going to use some hookey plot contrivance like a dream, just simply reboot.

Characters like Alan, Bobbie, Justus, Ned, Georgie, Felicia, Laura, Lucus and Emily (or whomever you think is essential to the show) are simply going to be part of the show again with no explanation given within the show itself and they are going to restart using this new writer's ideas. Is this something you could/would accept or would it be a jump the shark moment? Would you sacrifice the history of the last 5 or so years to follow GH in a better parallel universe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have to agree. I just started watching the show in August, so I'm not familiar with half of those people cited (I recognize Alan, Bobbie and Laura) and I just became familiar with the current characters. It would be too much for me for the show to change it all of the sudden. I wouldn't watch it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would go for this in a heartbeat. Have Felicia wake up and say she had a horrible dream where gangsters overran the town, and then reboot it back to Anna and Robert not dying. Spend a week catching the audience up on what all the people were up to, and then if you want you can retell the stories you want to reintroduce characters. Nik, Helena, Stefan and Alexis can all come again in a better story, Robin never had HIV because there was never any Stone, Jason is still a Q, no one died, and so on and so forth. This would mean no Sonny and I guess for Carly you could say the story happened but leave the details vague. She would still be Bobbie's daughter, but Tony would be alive. Now also you could have Sean and Tiffany back as well because they never left town. Jax would probably have to be reintroduced as an evil businessman.

Anything that brings back Tiffany is acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll pass. After at least 10 years of telling me they don't care about me as a viewer, to all of a sudden try to erase the gutting they did of this show to win back what, viewers they haven't given a crap about over the past so many years? I'll pass. Too little too late. I don't care about the show anywhere near how I used to and as a viewer I really could care less if it was cancelled tomorrow and off the air. I'd feel for the staff that was out of work as a result and I don't mean the overpaid highpriced writers and actors, I mean the folks behind the scenes who make things work. I let AMC go which was my show for years and I am about at the same place with GH as I was then. Nothing GH or even AMC would do would make me remotely interested in returning as a viewer including throwing Genie Francis and Jonathan Jackson back on canvas or bringing back Julia Barr back to AMC.

This show has had a terrible time the past few years especially trying to intro new females to the canvas to the point where they tried bringing back popular female actors as new characters only to flop. What they still don't get is history and depth to a character means something. I cared about Georgie Jones and who she was because she was F & F's daughter, I cares about Emily Q because she was a Quartermaine. I cared about Felicia and Monica and Alan. Alan as Jason's father should have been a tentpole character on this show. The show didn't and still doesn't and deserves everything they get as a result.I no longer have any interest in seeing any of these characters brought back or highlighted simply as some ploy to get me back as a viewer because they'd only be gutted again. I'll pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I didn't see those. It was inspired by how god awful GH is and how they have killed off a ton of important characters (and arguably a core family) in the last several years. I understand that it won't happen because TIIC don't think their is a problem nor any need for a do over. I just wondered if a soap asked for one what the audience reaction would be, assuming people who know how to do soap ever managed to get in power again. I could have easily picked Y&R, but Y&R doesn't really need it as badly. It wouldn't take such an extreme measure to right that ship, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't mind if they did this, but I would rather they just do what DAYS did and say most of the people they killed are really alive. They already brought Diego back from the dead once, why not do the same for others.

Then write out all the trash, and focus on the people who should have never gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When they brought back all of those people back from the dead on Days, I tuned out. I felt like I'd been played for a fool. Eventually, I tuned back in after about six months but I thought, why did the show put me through all of this for them all to end up alive on an island? I didn't like the storyline anyway, but I watched it and accepted those people as dead and was willing to move on. But when they showed up alive, that's when the show for me started to go south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The main difference is that was an end to a serial killer story. Of course some people were going to be annoyed that it ended with no real deaths. This would be an end to 5 or 6 years of pointless character death, scattered through lousy, empty story after lousy, empty story.

Would a lot of people tune out if the show brought AJ, Georgie, Justus, etc. back from the dead? I'm not sure if they would. It's not like the show has vastly improved with their absence. Their desperate flailing around of the past few years says it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the gross ickiness is Josh Griffith's intention. At birth, Ian Ward stole Mariah from Sharon, so that Sharon knew only of the Cassie twin and not the Mariah twin.  Sharon gave up Cassie for adoption at birth, never knowing that Mariah existed. When Ian Ward stole baby Mariah, he had her be raised by a woman member of his cult. She grew up in his cult. Years later, after Mariah was an adult in Genoa City and had left him, he tried to kidnap her to marry him himself, I sort of remember some icky scenes where he had arranged a wedding, but she escaped or was rescued -- it was so gross that I chose to forget it, and I don't want to look up the details. Mariah is feeling traumatized/triggered by Ian Ward being in Genoa City several months ago, because he was obsessed with her, and he terrorized her loved ones, interacted with Tessa, and drugged Sharon, which ultimately resulted in the death of Heather -- causing the grief of Daniel and Lucy. None of that was Mariah's fault. But she was so horrified by what happened, that she feels she did something wrong that caused this hateful villain to continue to obsess about her.   Based on small comments that Mariah made recently, I think she feels completely worthless. I gather that when she was away on the business trip a month or two ago, all of what happened with Ian Ward and Heather's death just hit her all at once and she was mentally/emotionally collapsing, and just felt unable to call for help.  During the business trip she sat in her hotel room and spiraled more, feeling more and more worthless and afraid. Finally she started drinking at a bar, and that's when the creepy old man approached her.  By that point, she wasn't in her right mind, and started interacting with the guy.  Either she thought he was Ian, or she thought he was someone like Ian, and she would be *required* to flirt with him in a role play, and do what he commanded, almost like old programming being reactivated.  Or perhaps just simple self-loathing playing out. I don't know if the guy actually knew Ian or Jordan, or if he was a random stranger.  But Mariah's fear/loathing/subconscious chaos kicked in. And then... well that's as far as her flashbacks have aired so far. She can't bear to face the rest of whatever it was.  I gather that in the coming episodes, we'll (eventually) find out what happened next as we see more of the icky flashbacks. --------------- The rest of this post is only my speculation: I think that she felt like she was supposed to have sex with him but didn't want to, and may have tried to kill him instead. Or he r*ped her.  Or they didn't have sex at all, but it's all convoluted in her mind.  Something horrible happened but I don't think it was her fault.  If the man died, maybe she covered it up?  I really don't know, I'm just speculating ideas. At any rate, I'm totally convinced that this is NOT a conventional "cheating storyline" where someone willingly has sex outside their relationship. ----------------- This is basically Josh Griffith's obsession with dark storylines, creepy villains, and terrible writing of "mental health issues".
    • The most we ever saw was on the "Roger years" tape.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy