Jump to content

AMC: Possible returns for 40th Anniversary


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Since this will probably be their last milestone anniversary (50th won't happen, and am pretty doubtful they'll make it to 45), it would be nice if they were to bring back some legacy actors/characters from the 70s and 80s just for one last time. Characters like Nick Davis, Mark Dalton, and Paul Martin still have ties to the canvass. Francesca James still has an association with the series, as sometime director and friend of JHC, so I could see her putting in an appearance, which could pave the way for some Tylers. Given this regime, I'm not counting on any of this, but again, one last time to see these characters would be cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I do have to give the show some props in the "bringing back old favorites for special episodes" category for the last couple of years. Even if you weren't a fan of the 35th anniversary episode, Phoebe's funeral episode, or Myrtle's funeral episode, you have to admit that they did a somewhat decent job in the area of getting some people to come back. I never thought someone like Francesca James would appear on the show again, but lo and behold, she did two episodes this decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would like to see Palmer get a nice farewell. I think it would be great if Nina, Tom, Brooke, Jamie, Chuck, Donna, Benny, Kelly, Linc, Skye, Jeff, Tara and Kelsey all came back for the Anniversary, but I don't think ABC is interested in the shows history prior to Megan McTavish's creations. And at the same time, I would love, just love to see so many flash backs from the show's rich history, but at the same time, just like on Myrtle's funeral episode, all of those flashbacks, it was like they were showing clips from a different show. JHC changed the look of Pine Valley so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think there was a purpose in Maria returning, but if Eva was interested, then I'm surprised they turned her down. Aside from the Kelly Ripa gimmick, I wonder if they are going to try to avoid returns, since the show isn't that much about fans now anyway. Pratt probably thinks the show's anniversary is a year since he took over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol::lol: Turrible!

I like Eva/Maria, but I can't think of any justifiable reason for her character's return. Edmund and Julia are dead, Erica could care less about her former in-law, no Brooke to chat with even, uhhh, who else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://x.com/MicheleValJean/status/1919575319146856657  
    • The penthouse was my favorite set... and it changed hands from Margo to Draper/April to Miles/Nicole then to just Miles... before he opted to give that beautiful place for that drab house with the even more drab Beth.  That was a jump the shark moment for me LOL
    • The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious.  April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn).  Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house.  Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford.  The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars).  Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000.  If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell.   Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm.  Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello.  If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery.  All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control.   Yep, you've got the Karrs and their very basic middle-class house, the Victorian-themed place where Miles and Nicole live, April and Draper's old craftsman house with the exposed beams, the Madisons & their Mission revival house, and Margo with her 1970s-chic penthouse.  Each of the sets is completely different.  And their budget was like zero, lol.  
    • It felt weird and out of place.  I get. While I agree with those on here that he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. 
    • It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ah! Good to hear. Isn't it especially odd to think that house fictionally exists not far from the Karrs?  Or, that it was designed non-fictionally by the same person who designed April's place?
    • Good to know I'm not the only one who noticed that. Strange and awkward, and I don't know what they're doing with those fades.   -- Finally, had to laugh at how many Emmys this board passed out today.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not unless they live in an apartment complex. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was bad. Product placement is fine, but not here, not now. Besides, no one carries their damn detergent to the living room.   Completely and utterly disagree. I thought Brandon Claybon was excellent today -- maybe his best performance since the show started. No recast needed.   Not unpopular with me. That didn't work. The montage was good, but 5 minutes of Amazing Grace? With all those verses? No. What kind of family breaks into a loud version of Amazing Grace after what just happened??? None. Anita's lecture to Leslie was great. Ending the show -- a really good episode with crackling dialogue -- like that was a mistake.  
    • Today, was a fantastic episode. I loved everything about, including Ainta singing, Amazing Grace. I love the family dynamic of the Dupree's so much. They remind me of my own family at times. Martin & Smitty have come leaps and bounds from where they  started. I genuinely felt a connection between them I can't wait to watch it deepen. Dana/Leslie/Sherry/Ana is a piece of work. Her speech at the Dupree's about her "concern" for Eva and then locking her out of their apartment??? She is pure evil, but I love it. I can't wait to see where the Eva/Kat story goes. There's so much potential there. As for Ted, I need to see Keith Robinson in the role before giving my true critique of Maurice Johnson.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy