Jump to content

AMC: Daytime Confidential confirming production moving to LA


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The City was in the same studio as Loving,ABC-TV 24 at 320 West 66th street.

This studio is where The View is now produced and for about 5 years,portions of the loft set were used on the show. AMC (and soon OLTL) is in the studio down the hall called ABC-TV 23. Ryan's Hope was in the The View/Loving/The City studio from 1985-89 and Loving was in the AMC/soon to be OLTL studio from 1983-89. LOVING moved to the TV-24 studio in late 1989 and AMC moved into the TV-23 in March 1990.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 502
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't think it's happened since the 50's or 60's.....and not more than once or twice.

None of the current soaps have ever changed coasts.

I would've said it never happened, but I just read the other day somewhere (maybe here, lol) where someone mentioned that a soap I'd never heard of had suffered from a move from NY to LA.

I do know that the 60's saw a big exodus of all kinds of productions from NY to LA, from The Tonight Show to every game show there was at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to Wikipedia,Glendale is near Glassell Park,so it has to be the KABC Broadcast Center studios.

http://gallery.bostonradio.org/2008-11/la/284-8474-sm.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glendale,_California

Glassell Park neighborhoods of East Los Angeles. The Golden State, Ventura, Glendale, and Foothill freeways run through the city.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glassell_Park,_Los_Angeles,_California

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it will impact AMC's ratings seriously. They have nothing to lose ratings-wise, especially when the ABC soaps seem to be doing just about the same.

If a lot of the cast doesn't want to make the move and their contracts are up before the move or whatever, it could be a problem. But who knows if actors leaving will seriously impact the ratings anyway at this point?

The only worrying thing is if this relocation is costing too much money, even if it will save the show a lot of money in the long-run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's going to totally ruin the show! It will all be different!

You know, the same way that Ugly Betty is unrecognizable since it moved from LA to NY. Or the X-Files was when it went from Vancouver to LA. Or Fringe will be when it goes from NY to Vancouver...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's the thing, though....I didn't believe that original DC article, because it sounded like bullish to me....and I was wrong. And in that original article, the same insiders who said that AMC was moving to L.A. also said that GH and AMC were safer than OLTL, because GH was ABC's signature soap, and AMC had built "legacy" characters over the years, whether or not they still remained on the show (I disagreed with that, since OLTL has done the same, IMO, but that's what the "insider" said).

So I have to believe, unfortunately for me, that if these insiders were right about this move for AMC, they are also likely right about AMC being safer than OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think 3 things are going to save the show money:

1) NY rent is EXPENSIVE. They own the studio where OLTL will be filming (AMC's old studio), but they didn't own OLTL's studio. So that huge rent is gone after December. (And if it's KABC studios where they'll be filming AMC in L.A., ABC owns that studio, so no rent there, either).

2) Their set in NY is so small that sets had to be taken down and put up over and over, on a daily basis. And that was done by expensive union workers. In LA, the studio is twice the size, so sets can be up permanently.

3) I really think they're banking on losing some "big" salaries with this move, since some actors won't want to relocate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Everyone keeps discussing losing cast members and what not. If they are under contract does that matter? I can see Susan Lucci having a clause in her contract about this but some of the others probably don't, I'm not sure how the whole thing works and what not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy