Jump to content

GH: August Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Thought I'd give this a bump since some people may not have seen it yet and are still posting on the July thread...

haven't seen the most recent episode yet, but hopefully it was great start to another month of ABC's longest running soap...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Excellent idea. Considering that just about nobody posts on the GH discussion thread, any comment should be welcome without having to justify it as positive or negative. This isn't the loony frenetic Y&R thread.

Responding to Dion's post on the other thread. Yeah, the MVJ hating Robin and Patrick is another bit of Scrubs fanbase delusion. I never see any of the great difference in the scripts that the Scrubs fanbase devotee claim to see. For all the praise, I see heaped upon GH writers on this board, I don't see any of them as anything special. MVJ and KH don't impress me and there isn't much difference in how they write for Robin and Patrick. Anyway, they do not have any kind of power on GH to determine if the writing for Robin or Patrick is good or bad. It is clear that Guza and Phelps direct the characters in specific directions and that their vision, particularly Guza's, wins out in the end.

Brought this over:

I wonder what Sarah Brown thinks about all this love thrown LLC's way and that she is being positioned as a rival for Sonny's affection. Sarah Brown is no fool and likes being the center of attention. I saw that she told her fans that she may not re-sign because she does not like playing such a dark character. More like she doesn't like that the character is not popular. Ha. She isn't going any where in this economy, but I cannot fathom what this means for her new version of Carly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I'm not really crazy about Sam and Jason getting back together.. But it's all part of GH's plan to keep Jason and Liz apart forever. =( Seems like a negative post, I know. Besides that, GH has been okay. Might like Lulu/Dante

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Darling. We're not nobodies! July's GH thread reached 5 pages and I think that's fairly decent for a show that jumped the shark a decade ago. And I like posting here precisely because it ISN'T da crazy Y&R thread.

I think SJB made it clear from the moment she signed on in 2008 that she needed to pay the rent. After all, she'd just had an editing suite built into her house and has aspirations to direct and produce. When she re-signed earlier this year, her reasons for doing so consisited of "the economy, the economy, um, she's a RLY interesting character. And, the economy."

The sad part was -- I was really loving her portrayal of unapologetically twisted Claudia! The Moobsters finally have a worthy rival. I'm sorry Brown feels that this is somehow a disservice to the character of Claudia. If we were forced to like poor widdle Claudia all the time (like we were in 2008), I think she would be much more hated.

Basically, Brown can never go back to 1999/2000 when she and Carly were at the height of their popularity. GH is different. Daytime is different. And Carly is VERY different. :lol: What she does get, though, is a character that she and the writers can build on over an extended period of time. I've seen SJB in some of her Primetime roles and honestly, a stand-alone hour-long episode is not enough time to flesh out the kind of female characters Sarah Brown wants to play. At best, she is guest-starring or in strictly 5-lines-of-dialogue supporting roles.

And for the record, a heart-of-gold character like Olivia? I cannot imagine SJB ever getting satisfaction out of playing that. Kissing Maurice ain't all that, Sarah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, I've only just begun watching a spotty episode here and there starting the day of Claudia's crash -- and even that was by accident. I was watching something else that went to commercial break and just clicked the jump button on my remote and I saw all of this CGI stuff with Carly walking around in the dark with a flashlight. I was like "what the hell is going on?" and tried to understand what was going on. I thought that sequence went on six hours too long, though -- but that's another story.

Honestly, this show is doing nothing but retread, and it's tired. Retread with Sonny's latest broodmare having a miscarriage. Retread with Sam and Jason. Retread with Alexis being screeched at by Carly in order to show Alexis as being the smartest idiot ever. Yes -- smartest idiot. That woman is too intelligent to be this dumb! I do like Maxie and Spinelli, largely because it's an attempt at unconventional romantic comedy. I am, however, highly annoyed at the fact that Pratt and Guza apparently had some pillow talk and decided to both use the "Desperate Woman Sells Twin Daughter" story within weeks of each other.

On a purely superficial note: Can Edward stop wearing Kangos indoors, please? It's not as if covering his baldness will somehow hypnotize us into believing John Ingle isn't 81 years old. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good point. LOL!

The problem is that Guza has no vision for Claudia outside of Sonny's orbit. I don't see them writing out Claudia, but Claudia without Sonny means less airtime for SJB. Killing that baby and building up the Sonny/Olivia whatever as well as the introduction of Dante puts Claudia on the outside for the time being anyway.

Yes. He had a procedure to remove a cancerous growth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good point! I'm still lost, since I wasn't watching last fall when the whole Sonny/Claudia marriage happened. What's the purpose of the marriage, and how is it that the Zacharra's are in alliance with Sonny? Does this marriage now neutralize Claudia, thereby making her useless if she were to be removed from Sonny's orbit?

I don't get mob stuff in general -- let alone make believe mob stuff where rules are made up as they go along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy