Jump to content

GH: June Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 268
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

what a waste of what could have been a return of Robert Scorpio.But since RGJr and JFP wants to pretend the past 40 years never happened (Thanks to that hoorendous 45 yr clip). Gee what would happen at 50 yrs,gee now i am scared.

Next up - Laura and Scott return with 80,000 newly born children,and Georgie returns from the dead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Guza logic. You know, the kind of logic which will have Sonny more pissed at Olivia for hiding Dante's paternity (YouAreDeadToMe) than at Claudia for putting Michael into a bullet coma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sure, but at the very least he should acknowledge that he's also flawed. A little self awareness in characters would be nice.

No, Guza logic doesn't even acknowledge that most people would have the intelligence to say maybe I shouldn't act completely judgmental and self righteous when I have committed the exact same sin that I'm castigating someone else for. Lucky actually has said that cheating means Luke didn't love Laura and that their time as a family meant nothing. So does that mean Lucky never loved Liz and that if Cam finds out about it he should think their time as a family meant nothing? The writing is completely plot point driven. Not just Lucky but this whole contrived mess. They could have found a better way to introduce NP. Instead they've committed character assassination on Lucky. I pray that before GH is canceled we will get a writer who actually cares about the characters so that th show can end on a good note.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lucky as played by GV is Guza's whipping boy -- like AJ and Ric before him. He will ALWAYS be made to look bad if it means bigging up other characters linked to him. Lucky's "hypocrisy" is a distraction. You say "How can he be upset when he did the same thing?" My response is "Why shouldn't he be upset?" Lucky's parents were everything to him -- he considers Laura a saint and for a long-time Luke was his best friend, his mentor, before Guza decided to rewrite history and pretend that Luke was a drunken dreamer who hated Laura and his children for "tying him down." And it is a rewrite because for 25-odd years, I watched a very different story unfold for the Spencers.

So why shouldn't Lucky hold his parents up to certain standards -- standards which he failed and he ADMITTED he failed and which he still views as unacceptable behaviour on his part? When he cheated on Liz, Lucky was addicted to painkillers and not in his right mind. Maxie was his dealer, his enabler. He prob would not have cheated on Liz if he wasn't on drugs. From his POV, he didn't cheat on Liz because he was out of love with her. He cheated because all he could think about was his next fix.

And ITA. They should have picked a better way to introduce Ethan rather than decimating a 15-year fan favorite (Lucky the character, I mean, though GV does have a loyal fanbase, too). I think NP could have definite potential if they had done it differently (and schooled that phlegmy voice of his).

Oh, BTW, I am shocked by Lulu's assertion that all guys cheat and we should put up with it because -- I don't believe it to be true. Good lord, did Feminism just REGRESS about 30 years here? Depending on the circumstances, of course, but cheating is a deal-breaker with me. I shouldn't have to put up with it if a guy I love is breaking my heart again and again looking for physical satisfaction elsewhere. Way to make me feel inadequate in bed!

Not only that, but way to make practically the entire male gender look feckless and untrustworthy, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She did not say ALL men cheat nor that anyone has to put up with it. Her father, both her brothers and two of her bf's cheated. Is it any wonder she thinks a lot of guys cheat? She seemed disappointed to me, but not particularly pissed off. I thought it was a reasonable reaction to something that happened 20 years ago. It would have made a lot more sense to me if Lucky had had the same reaction. LuLu didn't even say Lucky shouldn't be angry, she just said he should put the anger on Luck where it belongs and not Ethan.

I've never said he shouldn't be upset. It would make sense for him to be disappointed. It does not make any kind of sense for him not to acknowledge his own mistakes and temper his anger based on that. He cheated on Liz and still loved her and Cam. All I want is a Lucky smart enough to know that maybe Luke could have made the same mistake without it meaning he didn't love his family.

She did not say ALL men cheat nor that anyone has to put up with it. Her father, both her brothers and two of her bf's cheated. Is it any wonder she thinks a lot of guys cheat? She seemed disappointed to me, but not particularly pissed off. I thought it was a reasonable reaction to something that happened 20 years ago. It would have made a lot more sense to me if Lucky had had the same reaction. LuLu didn't even say Lucky shouldn't be angry, she just said he should put the anger on Luck where it belongs and not Ethan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure if Lucky has any reason to believe Luke loves his family. Luke has repeatedly said Tracy is the woman he truly loves, that Laura never let him be what he wanted. Luke has painted his entire relationship with Laura and his children as repression, as failure. Lucky now knows Luke felt that way even back then, because he was sleeping with other women behind Laura's back. Everything Lucky grew up with has now been painted as what Luke had to suffer through, what he hated, what he never actually wanted. His true happiness is with people besides Laura and Lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Next to the rewrite of Laura, I dislike the dishonesty of the Lucky/Luke/Ethan story the most. We are being told that Luke loves Lucky yet it obvious that Luke no longer loves or respect his son and even worse, it is clear that Luke never loved Laura in that deep abiding way that played out on the screen. It is in every word, gesture and the tone of every dismissive comment that Luke makes. (I suspect this TG's personal disgust coming through which is why so many Luke and Laura fans are outraged. People are not stupid and TG's latest interview only confirms the chatter on the boards.) Luke is so destroyed that I can accept this new version and return the favor of dismissing him, what I do not accept is having Lucky made out to the A.J. of the situation. Instead we should have been shown Lucky accepting that his father cares about him in a vague way, but does not love him. He would not be the first adult to figure this out about their parent or parents. It would have been interesting. GH must have gotten tons of negative mail about this story because they are going through hoops to find a way to salvage it.

I can't stand Ethan or Nathan Parsons, but he is here to stay until cancellation so whatever. I ff through most of the show anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see it more of a luke did love laura. a lot. more than anyone or anything else. but that love, being with her, kept him a tamed man when he wanted to be out there swinging in the jungle and scamming people. Not that Laura wouldnt let him and kept him hostage, but that he loved her and wanted to be with her and had to give up that part of his life to do it. but in the end, it ended up not being worth it.

as for lucky, i do think luke loves him. but only because its his son. luke has not respected lucky since like 1999 or cared for him. a big part of that is TG, IMHO, but Luke has always out others before Lucky. He has NO respect for Lucky, esp after her became a cop. Luke respects Nikolas more and cares for Liz more. I think the only reason he still has an ok relationship with Lulu is because deep down she is just like him. lol. I wish they would write Lulu againa s a mini-Luke, its when she was at her best.

Lulu = Luke.

Lucky = Laura.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He also doesn't like Lucky because Lucky is raising children who aren't his biologically. So the ideal world for Luke is one where adultery is fine, a woman who doesn't want you to be selfish and involved in criminal activities is a nag, and adoption or having stepchildren is unacceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy