Jump to content

Anthony Geary Bashes Wendy Riche's GH


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Oh I agree with both of you, but even back then Monty and Labine loved taking the bad guys like Luke Spencer, Duke Lavery, etc. who were criminals and mobsters and try to make them the heroes. And often they still held on to that evil side to a certain part.

It was a far cry from the Steve Hardy and Lee Baldwin and Peter Taylor that I grew up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh, ITA with you, and I hope you didn't think my post was getting "shouty" at yours! I have loved GH for a long time (well, since the mid-80s) and I was just trying to explain (not very cogently) the difference I felt when watching the show "back then" and "now."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't think anything was out of line or shouty about your post.

I thought it was very good and made excellent points.

Just one more thought, I always felt even on RH that Labine was a little obsessed with the mob. I felt RH was actually a lot better before she brought the mob into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Do I need to be one? I occasionally watch ATWT, OLTL, AMC and DOOL. I am not a fan of any of them, though, not under their current state.

I have tried watching the show on numerous occasions over the years. Whenever I see Luke, he's lifeless. When Laura came back, I loved her acting, but the character is just dead. I gave up quickly.

I prefer watching crap like Monica's cancer. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As far as someone having to be a GH fan or not to comment here?

Or in any thread for that matter pertaining to that show, I am of the belief that no you don't have to be - even though I have been told in the past many times that my opinions don't matter if I am not watching or enjoying the show but that is beside the point.

But now as far as judging someone's acting or their character on the show, I do put a lot more stock in the opinion of someone that I know is a fan of the show and watches it all the time.

Many of us look in on shows from time to time and we judge actors and characters by what we see in those few times. It is the same as a person who doesn't even watch soaps but happens to look in on them a few times and says how can you watch that crap.

What those people do not see are the day in and day out nuances of that character and the day in and day out performances. That is when you can get the full judgement of a performer.

Many people see clips of an actor and actress and say wow how in the world did that person get an Emmy or why in the world do people say that person is good. Or they say that person is totally over the top. Half the time they do not know the history of the character, what might have made them act that way, is that part of the character to act that way, etc. All that goes into judging a performance.

When we make flash judgements based on a few scenes or a few episodes then we are no better than the Emmy committees who give someone best show based on one stunt or one great episode. Or give an Emmy to someone like Natalia Livingston who is a weak actress for the most part but put together a great Emmy reel.

So no you don't have to be a fan of a show to comment, but to me the opinion is not as valuable as someone who does watch or is a fan.

JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. I felt like Joe (along with Rae's daughter Kimberly) ruined the show, especially when they recast with Roscoe Born and he took over huge chunks of the show. I hated what became of Siobhan. Endless wailing about "JOEEE!!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You may not like him but to say that Luke and laura lost their magic is not true at all

The person who asked you if you a GH fan is legit cause if you've been watching GH since the 90's then you really don't know what Luke and Laura are all about

I've been watching since 1981 and no couple could even compare to them, i'll be glad to see them together even when in their 80's.

And for all of you T. Geary, you are entitled to it but we don't know the whole story here, yes she a good EP but she may have been a bitch also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I would argue that Another World never played "everything" for laughs. Even when there were comedic scenes in some storylines there were other storylines that were not intended as comedy.  You give 1988 as the end point, and Mary was on the canvas from August 1986 to February 1989, so she must have overlapped with the despised laughs you are referring to at least half of the time she was there. I honestly can't recall any real comedy that Mary would have been part of. I don't think she was lighthearted about choosing between two husbands, MJ's prostitution, Kathleen's death, or even her son Scott dating her daughter Cheryl.  I would have said that the amount of comedy depended on the head writer and there was more comedy under Richard Culliton and Gary Tomlin in 1984 than subsequent headwriters. I guess there was an outbreak of more comedy when Cecile kidnapped Cass from his wedding in 1986, but in general the Sin Stalker wasn't presented as funny, Mitch's return wasn't funny, John's arrival wasn't funny, Reginald wasn't funny. The tone was serious even if the plots verged on the ludicrous. And maybe that's what you mean -- but I would make a distinction between intentional comedy and storylines I can't take seriously for other reasons. 
    • I'm excited for us to get back to a full weeks worth of episodes and also us beginning to move into the episodes filmed once the show premiered. We're already starting to see changes in the lighting and the way certain characters are styled. Of course we know this week we have our first recast as well. After the big Eva reveal, I hope the show continues to move into a positive direction and that we see them starting to fix some of the things we've all had issues with.
    • It seems like they may have been going in one direction for Andre and then changed their mind. He had this player/bachelor thing going at first where he was messing with Dani, seemed to be feeling Eva, and then somehow smitten by bland Ashley of all people. I feel like Ashley was supposed to be the one that finally made him want to be with someone and settle. The way he talked her up in those earlier episodes was really confusing. The wonderful, amazing nurse Ashley and conveniently she's unattainable because she has a partner, but he can't stop thinking of her and takes these busted pics of her. It was a mess. However, it all seems to have been dropped. I honestly feel like Andre can go. That may be an unpopular opinion but I don't need his breathy final syllable to be content with BTG. It's always like "There's gotta be another wh-ahyy"
    • This is where McLaibey falls apart. It becomes clear that McTavish had not thought past Brent/Marion...so the energy drops and she starts throwing things at the wall (Blakes twins, Lonatrat.)   Fans HATED this funeral. Everyone is mad at everyone else, which is fine, the death of a beloved community figure would give people a reason to come together...(Quint and Nola could come together at least for  a bit to support each other, Nola and VAn could finally admit they kinda, sorta like each other) Its just an example of McTavish's mean writing.   I have a feeling they were going to make Dahlia Frank's kid but they chickened out. Making Tina a prostitute didn't help, they could have been lovers when they were young but felt society pressure to part. Marcus took over David's role (you can't have two young black men at that time...)   Get used to it...this will happen, the same storyline over and over until the end.
    • Does anyone happen to have a recording or any footage of Jennifer’s funeral?
    • It's such a shame that the conflict couldn't be resolved in a mature way between the two actors.. especially since Albee was a bigger asset for the show in terms of character and his popular will they/won't they pairing with Deborah Saxon. One of the things about Edge was that it was just as popular with male viewers as it was with women.  It's one of things I think the show forgot in the final year or two with the deemphasis on the male characters.
    • Daytime Confidential did a podcast of the worst mothers in soaps and here were their lists.  5.Felicia Scorpio 4.Reva Shayne 3.Dina Mergeron 2.Helena Cassadine/Shelia Carter 1.Brooke Logan Dishonorable Mentions- Stephanie Forrester,Ann Douglas, Phyllis Summers and Joanna Manning Joshua 5.Anna Devane 4.Diane Jenkins 3.Ava Vitali 2.Shelia Carter 1.Brooke Logan Dishonorable Mentions-Alexis Davis, Felicia Scorpio, Eve Donovan, Heather Webber, Natalia Ramirez, Stephanie Forrester,and Ruth Martin Luke 5.Natalia Ramirez 4.Diana Coville 3.Helena Cassadine 2.Alexis Davis 1.Arlene Vaughn Dishonorable Mentions-Stephanie Forrester Now for my comments. Wonder what Ruth Martin ever did to this guy?!!! I mean Ruth Martin? I don't get it. Next, IMO they are just picking on Eve Donovan. Who is Dina Mergeron? Same question  Joanna Manning? Diana Colville Is that because of the bad DAYS retcon of her being Leo Stark's mother? All of the rest, CO-SIGN!  
    • Thanks! Looking forward to reading the rest!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy