Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 It's amazing how some people don't look objectively at all the characters involved. I wouldn't want Nick, Sharon, or Phyllis raising me if I were a child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Adam Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Objectivity and soap fans RARELY mix in my experience anyway. When objectivity is not part of the equation, opinions become alot more hollow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MichaelGL Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Perhaps Sharon will become pregnant with twins, by two different daddies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeeeDee Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Amen. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members brimike Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Oh God. Please - never again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BadZoe Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 There are more possibilities if the baby is Billy's. Sharon and Nick don't find instant happiness, but eventually they may get back together in spite of it. Jack and Billy will be at odds, leaving the door open for Victor to swarm in. Billy will be in serious hot water with Chloe since she's stated he can have his affairs, as long as they don't come back to publicly humiliate her. If the baby is not Billy's, what was the point of having their affair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JackPeyton Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 to make Phyliss' child Jacks and Sharons baby turn out to be Nicks would just be lame IMHO. It just proves as a happy ending of sorts, and thats nice and all. But this is a romantic comedy. Its a soap opera. Long term drama plays out much better the other way around, esp is they put Nick back with Sharon. They will always have to deal with Phyliss and Jack via being the babys parents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Conflict between Jack and Billy, when Jack finds out Billy is among the possible father's. But I still think Jack will be the father and that will be the Cassie story coming full circle because Cassie wasn't Nick's bio daughter either. Plus they really need to establish Jack with a family that is in town. They can bring back Kyle and really should bring back Kemo as well (but I doubt they will). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 I think Sharon is carrying Nick's baby and, sadly, in the passage of time, we'll learn that Summer is Jack's. And that will set the stage for, in 2015, the two end-game couples to finally come together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ann_SS Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Sharon's baby is so Nick's. The fact that of all the potential fathers, she does not tell Nick is a dead give away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Yeah, let's see the Y&R fans defend that, lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JackPeyton Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Id love it. Not gonna lie. But i am a DAYS fan, so... Besides, it DOES really happen. lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members brimike Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 It was interesting when GL tried it (the first time), but now it's just stale and overused. A soap story I hope never happens again, but that's just my own personal opinion. I know others like it, but I've never bought it, even if it does happen in reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Why not, just for innovation, make it triplets, three daddies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted May 4, 2009 Members Share Posted May 4, 2009 Why not just let Sharon fall down the GCAC stairs and lose the bastard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.