Jump to content

Y&R: Nia Peeples has a HUGE Ego!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ms. "Walker Texas Ranger/Wheels Of Justice/Deep Star Six" has got a lot of fuckin' nerve.

If I could I'd find the clip of her ridiculous looking death by rubber monster in Deep Star Six.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hate to see actors cannibalize one another like that. Peeples is lucky enough to be on a well written show, but for most actors, TPTB/the writers are the problem. To comment on another actors' talent, or even another actor's storyline, is tacky and unprofessional, IMO. Nia Peeples is good, not great, and I'm bothered by the fact that she's dismissed the talent of every other actor on the show. What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall if Eric Braeden ever takes her behind a closed door to give her a piece of his mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know, remember that these blog radio shows are "new". I'll bet folks like Peeples think of these as little "niche" showsheard by 50 people, and therefore they don't use the candor that they would on, say, The View.. Of course, what happens is that if someone says something controversial, it spreads. I'm personally suspecting that is --partly -- what happened to Victoria Rowell too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe it is because I am not an actor and yes she is very passionate about her "talents" but it wasn't that bad to me. I am sure others will not take it lightly though specifically the ones it was aimed at. To me she was being honest but for other "talents" I could see why they may be offended about her perspective on their craft. She could have approached it from a peer's perspective and instead chose to be awfully honest; but at least she wasn't raw like VICKY lol (though I loved it I thought she was being strong and standing up for herself but thats just my opinion)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I find the implication that Y&R is somehow more respectable than any of those shows hysterical. On the scale of bad places for an actor to end up, I think soaps are somewhere between tampon commercials and Star Trek conventions (and I say that as a lifelong Trekker). IMO, they're all in the category of "at least it's not porn."

It's one thing to disagree with what she said but this is a message board devoted to soap operas, not Scorsese films. Nobody here (including myself) gets to point fingers at another genre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing is Paul Rauch has been a big influence for Y&R. Before when it was Bell/Griffith the show was all over the place. So what she is saying is true. The show was in a transition period. Everyone knows Paul's reputation he is known as one of the hardest, most intimdating, and scariest producers to work for. He is very very TOUGH. Even Christel Khalil said that Paul is extremely hard on everyone. Paul does not put up with crap period. The show has risen in quality and looks more expensive and the ratings are showing it. It is clear CBS made the right decision in bringing Rauch back to Y&R. It seems to be a perfect fit. He is bringing back the old Y&R classic style and doing Bill Bell proud. I am glad Nia gave somewhat of insight into what is going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •  Yeah, he is still dressed like Martin. He looks great, though.  Cute picture. Sober up, cause we need the tea.
    • Well, Claire did rig Rick's test results, but it was to flunk. They actually managed to get his correct results back after they were thrown into Cedar's furnace...I think? Everyone knew Claire changed them and Rick passed so that rewrite never made sense.   I agree. Pratt always seems "edgy" on screen (and her Locker Room interview prooved that it came from her personality.) I liked Claire causeing trouble and love Meta ringing her beads. Its just too bad that Abby left and they kinda just forgot Claire existed. 
    • Oh so they did sleep together. The retcon was just the medical boards? That makes sense. I think Susan Pratt, while a good actress, was just an unlikeable presence onscreen and soaps wrote to that most of the time. There was some potential for more with her when she returned in that stint, as Pratt was at least interesting to watch and caused some conflict for the stifled Bauers. Instead of pairing her with Alan and then disappearing I might have had her hook up with Danny. I think there was a lot of flirtation with Bolger's Philip, but they never crossed the line.
    • I haven't seen Melchior in the role, but it would be astounding if she's worse than Linn. Her rivalry with Stephanie was sidelined IMO because Linn was one of the few actors who didn't have chemistry with, nor raise her game, when paired with Susan Flannery. To be fair, she did show some signs of life in scenes opposite Darlene Connelly, but way too little too late. It feels like Bell finally woke up after the Thorne switchover and sidelined the Kristin character with Mick to 1 or 2 appearances a week. As a result, the show improved by leaps and bounds after she was inexplicably at the center of the show for most of 1989. Margo is so much more enjoyable when not tied to that albatross. Even Clarke is watchable with less Kristin interaction. She can't exit stage left soon enough. As for the new Thorne, I agree that Norcross feels like a Forrester a lot more than Thrachta, even if the latter is a better actor.
    • The cast said that scenes were filmed over a few weeks, with a preplanned hiatus in the middle, and it was all out of order.  I would *guess* that they used Chandler when they could get him? They also had to work around Leo Howard getting married around the time these episodes were filmed, but I guess they worked it out since Tate appeared.
    • Maybe there was a scheduling conflict or something. He still has the full time 9-5 in Atlanta, right? Julie was there. Idk if Maggie’s gonna be a part of it though 
    • At this point, the best nonpaywall coverage of Los Angeles (and anything political)  is in...the Tennessee Holler https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social And as always, emptywheel continues to be consistent https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social
    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy