Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's not just them, no, but I do think they tend to take over the narrative and take away any of the necessary criticism. I saw more focus yesterday on a Simpsons writer playing victim because people didn't think her latest screed against Kamala was funny than on sensible solutions from a progressive perspective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5989

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3461

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I happen to be grateful for it. By drawing a line between the far left and "the mainstream of the Democratic Party" we get permission to push these leftists back to the fringe. A lot of people, including mainstream voters, are tired of the performative left especially since all they ever seem to do is screw everything up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm one of the people who are tired of it.  And I'm a fairly liberal Democrat.  They are equal to the far right crazy Republicans to me.  No, not nearly as bad in the end, but bad for the country as a whole.  And a big reason that Hilary lost because it was da-Bern or no one.  And they got Trump and I think secretly happy about it.  Their frame of mind was "there, stuck it to 'em!  HA!"  No, you stuck it to yourselves, idiots.  Because we live with this Supreme Court for decades or the rest of your life depending on how fast they die....so your need to skip student loans outweighed the REALLY correct thing we needed.  Pay your damned debts and get over it.  I paid off my student loans and it's not unreasonable to ask you to do the same.  Should you have been given a loan?  Don't know, but you were.  They are college educated people and I think knew what a loan was when you took one.  I learned what a loan was and what collateral was from The Brady Bunch.  And in classes.  And as explained to me before I took out loans and that I would have to pay them back.  This is why I went to community college for 2 years and didn't go to my "dream school".  That's life, and this is the problem with that generation and that mind set.  You don't always get what you want or have to sacrifice....or actually - not.  You don't have to sacrifice if you don't want to - that's what your loans are.  So you didn't sacrifice, now pay them.

Edited by Fevuh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It shouldn’t take Mo Farah telling the world that he was trafficked as a child to humanize the undocumented migrant but hopefully people will listen to his account and reconsider the inhumanity toward undocumented people whose labor benefits every “advanced” and “industrialized” nation on this planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All 100% true. They're to blame and they'll never admit it, and I will never forget. But I don't think any of that has anything to do with how I think the administration's thus far fumbled the response to Dobbs. Two different things, and while the Bern left may have capitalized on that discontent for their own purposes (just like they tried and failed to turn the public on Ukraine, which was just pathetic), it's not all coming from them. It's at least equally from sensible, mainstream Democrats who didn't see this coming like a lot of us, and want to hear specific plans, landmarks, and how far the administration is actually willing to go, not just in symbolic show votes or whatever but re: SCOTUS and everything else. Like, what will you commit to now about doing if we keep the majority and expand it? Because just killing the filibuster and codifying Roe is useless with the current SCOTUS makeup. And if the whole national parks/federal land spiel isn't viable, which it probably isn't, then okay, what is? What's next? We've got to offer something beyond just speaking on background to Politico and CNN about how they don't want to get into losing court battles, which the Republicans already have no problem getting into in order to throw red meat to the base.

And yes, it would be fine to say 'we don't need to do that stuff, we want to govern instead' in normal times. Nobody needs to tell me about how real, sensible adult governance is often slow, boring and unexciting; my mother spent her career doing that work down there, and it was good work with good people who didn't get a lot of likes on Twitter or go viral. They just worked hard and did the job. But even she would tell you we're not in normal times. We're in fucked times. We have to do more to just try to function like it's normal, because it's tragically abnormal now. I'm not asking for just crass red meat, but it's clear a lot of people are asking for more. The Republican courts (not just SCOTUS) are operating within profoundly different rules, and we have to get creative. And I really hope the White House can do that, soon. I think they've been in a fugue since December, I think they were genuinely blindsided not just by Dobbs (which is something they've admitted on background) but by their conventional wisdom on Manchin and BBB failing them, and I think it's been a series of triages ever since. I take zero pleasure in saying that. But they've got to find a path, and that isn't just coming from laymen, it's coming from old hands. When you have Dick Durbin of all people roasting the White House in public over that anti-choice judgeship thing, it's not a great look.

I especially feel bad for Harris, who's already stuck with a Beltway press who deeply dislike her and frame every story around their distaste for her and is trapped behind the 8-ball on the Dobbs questions in interviews, waiting for a cue from the White House.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dang! I'm just wondering what the DOJ is going to do. Besides testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson , this stuff absolutely blows my mind. Usually, I watch msnbc at times depending on who it is. Whenever I see Stephanie Ruhl, Rachel Maddow, Ari Melber, and Nicole Wallace together in the same room, I'm in delightful heaven. Regardless of what news channel I choose to watch, it doesn't matter. DOJ needs to step up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The best way i can sum up my position is based on a tweet I saw but can't find.

"You can tell the people who are just now realizing Roe is gone as opposed to those of us who knew it was gone back in 2016 when Hillary lost."

All of these people "disappointed" in Biden and asking for a plan aren't prepared to handle the truth which is there is no quick fix. This will take decades of work to fix and we're here because people didn't listen to the email lady. People screaming at Biden are just Karens calling the manager but the manager can't fix this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, things are getting a little out of hand.  I know James Carville is a nut, but I agree with him on the language issue to an extent.  Are people really going to keep insisting on the term "pregnant people"? That comes across as so nutty, imo. I don't even disagree with using the term, but insisting that everyone else does or they are trans phobic is a weird hill to die on. There are about 50 pregnant men a year and that's where you're focus is? It's embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know that tweet and I agree. I just don't think that changes the fact that it seems like the White House has no clue what to do next, with those weeks or months or years let alone decades. And unfortunately, right now they're the ones left holding the bag. So, the question is what's next?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Today we learned Trump is calling witness (probably Pat Cipollone)  directly to intimidate them into lying to congress.

Even Stefano Dimera had henchmen to do his bidding...

Also, Pat Cipollone has 12 kids and helped convert Laura Ingraham to Catholicism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's a pet peeve of mine. I know I'm showing my age but "pregnant people" just doesn't sound right to my ears. I understand and agree with the need for inclusive language but it just sounds off to me. It's like when people say that something is "AN historic event." (That has driven me crazy for most of my life.)

That said...however I feel about all that "messaging" stuff, the thing I really hate is how the trans community is such a small part of the population and yet they've been targeted with unimaginable hate. Not just the trans community but LGBTQ+ children especially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
    • The show is done. It got canceled at the end of January. https://www.soapoperanetwork.com/2025/02/fox-first-run-cancels-dish-nation-person-place-or-thing-pictionary-759232
    • I believe it. ESPECIALLY that last one. 
    • Aristotle Dumas. Just thought I'd throw that out there!  
    • Lol is that like an AI type of thing that popped up?

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy