Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The ideal time to have saved the planet was likely several decades ago but this seems promising, at least.

 

And more importantly, there is this.

 

 

It had to chortle at the fact that China, which couldn't bother to show up, is now grousing about not being able to tongue-lash other countries by video message, but was instead limited to a written message, which no doubt, will lack the impact Xi will have wanted.

No word from Putin, the other no-show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Does anybody want to predict today's marquee races (not only who will win, but also by how much)? I'll post my predictions, but keep in mind that these predictions are heavily influenced by recent polling, which could very well be garbage (witness a "respected" poll that had Biden winning Wisconsin by 17 points as Election Day 2020 approached, or the fact that Susan Collins wasn't ahead in a single poll last year).

Polling is extremely scarce in New York City, but based on what I've seen, Eric Adams will defeat Curtis Sliwa by over 30 points. (In a post I wrote earlier this year, I wrote that there was an outside chance of Adams winning by only a 10 to 15 point margin. But for that to have occurred, NYC Democrats needed to be in disarray on Election Day, and a severe crime wave would have had to taken place.) Beyond Adams' 30+ point margin of victory, it's hard to make a prediction. However, I'm pretty sure that Adams will not replicate Bill de Blasio's 48.84% margin of victory over Republican Joe Lhota, as voters were extremely hungry for change in 2013 after 20 years of Giuliani and Bloomberg. And I'm guessing that Adams won't do quite as well as de Blasio did in 2017, when he defeated Nicole Malliotakis by 38.58 points (as I suspect that de Blasio fatigue will have some effect on Adams' margin of victory).

In New Jersey, a generic Democrat typically defeats a generic Republican by about 15 points. Though incumbent Democratic Governor Phil Murphy will not defeat his Republican opponent, former Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, by that much, I do predict a nine or ten point Murphy victory. One very interesting factoid is that despite New Jersey's dark blue tint--it hasn't voted Republican for POTUS since 1988 and has not elected a GOP senator since 1972--Murphy would become the first Democratic governor to win a second term since the late Brendan Byrne accomplished this feat in 1977. (Note, however, that Democrats did win back-to-back gubernatorial elections in 2001 and 2005.)

Given how Democratic Virginia has become, I am very reluctant to predict that a Republican will win statewide. That said, I'll listen to the polls and the pundits and predict that Glenn Youngkin will defeat Terry McAuliffe by about a point. So much has already been written about the awful race that McAuliffe ran and the effect Biden's unpopularity is having on him, but I think McAuliffe is also being hurt by the aftermath of the Ralph Northam blackface scandal. (And none of us knows for sure if he was the one in blackface or if he was the one in the KKK costume; so many people are just taking Northam's word for it.) I do believe that the Northam scandal did play a part in McAuliffe's apparent failure to adequately link Youngkin to Trump, and I couldn't believe how idiotic McAuliffe was to have made campaign appearances with Northam. Plus, a 2019 statement of McAuliffe's came to light in which he absurdly suggested the infamous Northam photo was a youthful mistake (and then began to question whether Northam was in that photo at all):

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/22/politics/kfile-mcauliffe-northam-blackface-scandal/index.html

Regardless of how the Virginia gubernatorial election turns out, I do think that too much is being made regarding its impact on next year's midterms. Here's a good article that discusses the historical correlation between the Virginia gubernatorial contest and the subsequent midterm election:

https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/a-last-word-on-virginia/

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Eric Adams defeating Curtis Sliwa is not a difficult prediction to make. NYC is overwhelmingly Democratic and Sliwa is a kook who offered nothing on his platform but bizarre campaign ads. I predicted he'd win before anyone even voted during the Democratic primary.

Not to sound rude or dismissive, I'm just not in the mood for further predictions, as I feel like it's become a kind of game, and this is real life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm done letting polls damage my calm ever again. Pollsters and pundits thought the CA recall would be close, that Eric Adams would lose the NY mayoral primary, and that Nina Turner had a snowball's chance in hell of winning OH-11.

Someone on the ground I trust thinks T-MAC will be fine and the turnout seems to be really, really good. At some point maybe it's time to admit that polling in the current environment is broken for all sorts of reasons and adjust accordingly.

As for Manchin, he's just flexing for his constituents back home. He'll do the right thing. He usually does.

I remember all this. But the truth is that when people were pushing for Northam to resign, polls showed that 60 percent of Black voters wanted him to stay. As soon as I saw that, I knew he wasn't going anywhere.

Edited by marceline
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I'm just going about my day and hanging loose turning into the skid. Whatever happens or doesn't, most of the media narratives are pre-written. If it turns out for us, watching them slowly, grudgingly be undone is always a fun process. If it doesn't it's not like we don't have an insane amount of work to do as is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He's a hatemonger who has been lauded to no end by the press as an "optimist" and as the ideal.

Never forget, unless you are a rich white person (ideally a man, ideally a straight one on top of that), the media hates you and wants you dead. 

People fall for this every time. Hate and bigotry in different wrappings sell well, no matter what. It's hard to even get through each day knowing that. I admire anyone who can or does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't believe it's legal.  It would be nutty and cruel to keep that many cats in a large house never mind some little apartment. The sanitation issues alone would be a nightmare.

It's been the better part of a year since I felt that way. Then yesterday with that CNN front page of little girls being sold to old men for food money.  The suffering in this world is horrific. If you want to live you have to block most of it out, but there are just days when it's impossible. Hang in their Carl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Juliajms Thank you. Same to you. That CNN report sounds awful.

This account will also give you many results from different state-by-state elections.

https://twitter.com/Taniel/status/1455757339169067008

The dead end left has already zeroed in on India Walton's loss in the Buffalo mayoral race to the incumbent she had beaten in a primary (he went the write-in route), claiming Democrats cared more about beating her than Republicans. Failures and grifters like Nina Turner have also chimed in. They won't have much to say about it, but Walton made some serious errors:

 

 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • 'You mean...THAT Eva.' hahahahaha. From the mouth of babes.   Lord...don't tell me this is going to be a near-miss on Andre/Dani.    And now...I have to watch the rest later. lol.
    • The picture that June left on the table, which Naomi found

      Please register in order to view this content

        Attempts to rotate and unskew that image  
    • Hayley and June have to be related, if not... why the focus on June. Dani/Andre = fast forward material.  #FreeAndre Kat and Samantha: Sassy isn't cute.  Sassy gets your ass whooped Eva: It's nice one member of her family is welcoming to her.  And I'm glad that the mention of her previous career in hair is being used here. Anita:  Given the way she's acted in a few scenes already, I could easily see her being a backstabber and leaving her group behind.  Is the group more like the Supremes or more like the Pointer Sisters?   This was more of a filler day, but sometimes you need a down day in order to process the last several episodes of plot movement.    
    • -- I'm on record as enjoying the new writers at DAYS, but add me to the list of those who have big problems with the hospital purchase being tied to the miracle drug. I'll accept a lot under the "It's A Soap" banner, but I hate it when it goes ludicrous. -- Recast Rachel isn't bad, but she isn't Rachel. She doesn't make me hate her and think she's obnoxious when she walks into a room, so she doesn't work.
    • Either him or Doug III. Those are the only guys in town that she's not related to 

      Please register in order to view this content

      He goes to the same tanning salon as his brother, Rex  That could be a pretty good addition to this storyline
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

      Today's episode is sponsored by the letter P
    • Do I promise that I left that conversation? Yeah, sure, if you want to call it a promise. It just wasn't going anywhere. It's also not a big deal. 
    • What do you mean?  Sarah told Xander about the drug as soon as she found out about it, and before eating the scone.   She also told Xander not to buy the hospital in March because the impending lawsuits from the sabotaged set of Body & Soul would eventually lower the price of the hospital. (one assumes Bonnie and Justin's lawsuits have been forgotten) In fact, she called it a money pit at the time, and now she and her daughter stand to make a fortune. Just as, she knew that Philip's claim to the fortune were both fraudulent, and a good distraction to keep Xander from making a bid until the time was right... Even more proof that Dr. Sarah Horton-Kirakis is the true evil genius of Salem.
    • Now what was I just talking about? lol. I was not expecting to see Jacob today.    VERNON!!!!!!! LOL.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy