Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

I can see why people who supported Clinton would be annoyed, and I agree that white men have a privilege that no one else does (and I think that is another reason so many resent and dislike Pete, because they don't feel he has done enough to accept his privilege). It's just that in this case, when the comments are brought up two months after being said, and are brought up by a white man no less, then it feels less like genuine anger on behalf of Hillary to me and more like someone either not being able to have their campaign tactics criticized, or, possibly, someone who has an issue with Pete or is more inclined to support another candidate, and chooses to make this a topic just as Pete is gaining in the polls. 

 

All he's done is just yet again expose Hillary to negative media conversation and attacks, even as she has tried to move on. It gives me bad flashbacks to the way that Bill, Mark Penn, and so many others on her two campaigns behaved. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    5830

  • DRW50

    5600

  • DramatistDreamer

    5285

  • Khan

    3201

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

There is no question as Pete's popularity has risen @DRW50, people started digging. That's likely why this surfaced. And it's going to happen. That's what campaigns do.

 

I think Pete for the most part has stayed away from this stuff and in his case more self awareness I think. He's also discussed stories about himself and his own privilege, so he's aware of it, perhaps I am being unfair to him.  And let's be honest it's the digging and then the media globbing onto this that fed this story. I don't believe it's as important as twitter is making it out to be. I have to remember something I heard Jason Kander say is that the world does not live on twitter. Which is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In right wing money suck circle news, DC McAllister, who, sadly, is not a kick-ass newspaper editor from 1945 but is instead...this person, has gotten fired from her job at The Federalist. She claims it's because of her comments about gay journalist Yashar Ali, which included such gems as he is trying to "find himself in another man's [!@#$%^&*]," but the likely reason is because she decided to decided to go off about the ladies of The View, even though one of them is married to...the co-founder of The Federalist. And she was even at her wedding. Yes, it is nepotism icon, Meghan McCain. 

 

https://www.inquisitr.com/5369520/dc-mcallister-you-were-at-my-wedding-denise-meme-fired-by-that-weddings-groom/

 

http://www.papermag.com/meghan-mccain-denise-response-2632983881.html

 

Anyway, Ben Shapiro also canned her from her gig at the Daily Wire, she claims because of her comments about a gay man. I find that very hard to believe, so I wonder if he was just looking for an excuse. If not, then the idea of being too homophobic for Ben Shapiro is mind-boggling. 

 

I'm sure Trump will make her a Cabinet secretary soon enough. Or she can go drain money on whatever the far right uses in place of Patreon now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a lot like 2016, in that it seems impossible on the one hand, and yet you can almost feel history repeating itself.  Many on the left are over confident again. There is just no way we can lose right? Look at how awful he is! Look at the poll numbers! I'll never forget how pissed I got at my husband for saying he thought Trump could win it a few weeks before the election.  "There is no way in hell that's going to happen!" 

 

Well, "we"  let the monster in the door and it's not going to be that easy to get it out again. Not just Trump himself, but all the hate and the erosion of Democratic norms.  All of the things  that helped get us here such as Russian interference and voter suppression are still problems. The only difference is that Trump is already in power this time.

 

Of course, that doesn't even address the people on the far left who want to sabotage any democrat who doesn't fit into their effing revolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The media is really picking up the story with Joe Biden in earnest.  Because Biden has been in public office for so long, there's a lot of 'meat' to pick at there. 

I think it may also become a case of 'the more you know, the less there is to like' type of scenario.

It's been mentioned many times in this thread that Democrats and Republicans have different standards for their candidates. 

Republicans probably wouldn't have balked at backing John Edwards, despite his awful personal history, because look who is in office now.  Democrats have expected more, even before the emergent 'ultra-progressive' left arrived on the scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

They would have just said Edwards made a mistake, everyone does, and say Jesus anointed him (as they say for Trump). You know they actually paint pictures of Jesus walking with Trump. It just makes your skin crawl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Can't say that I'm at all surprised by this. 

Russia has been in Africa before helping to train and arm resistance fighters, including anti-apartheid fighters in Southern Africa but this time the Kremlin appears to be aligned with autocrats in politically fragile countries if its alliances with the Central African Republic, Eritrea, Sudan and Libya are any indication (yikes!). 

And with the U.S. currently being run by a man who regards Africa, not as a continent but one big sh*thole country, it's not surprising that even democratic-leaning African countries like Mali are looking to the Russians more and more.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy