Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3459

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

It's not the fault of Democrats that this country is full of racists, sexists, and people who are happy to embrace authoritarianism. It's time for people to realize that the electorate is the problem. There isn't some magic formula that Democrats have to use that will reverse what these people want for this country. A lot of people in this country want a white nationalist country and want authoritarianism. They don't want democracy. The don't want to share this country with the rest of us. That isn't about Democratic messaging it's about the electorate. Blaming Democrats for "letting it get this close" is just another way of trying to fool ourselves. Millions of people in this country hate us and would happily kill us all if they could get away with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Well, for starters, it'd be nice if the Democratic Party were to renounce not just the far-left progressive types who arose in the wake of Bernie's so-called revolution and co-opted our party for their own grift, but strike any and all elements of their pie-in-the-sky agenda from our platform as well.  The right and far-right insist that we are hellbent on turning this country into a socialist nation -- which is so not true, but hard to argue down when we keep setting places for, say, AOC and the rest of the "squad" at our table.  I mean, right here in Oklahoma, all Stephanie Bice had to do was say Kendra Horn was BFF's with AOC (and with Nancy Pelosi, another highly-profiled Democrat who might be doing us more harm than good the longer she stays near the front of the line) and it was lights out for the first Democratic senator my state has had since God knows when.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

We did. That's what happened when we nominated Biden. When Biden kept saying "I beat the socialist" that's what he was doing. The Berners are losing their minds today because the truth is they wanted us to lose. BTW, when people talk about Trump getting more votes now that he did in 2016 don't discount how many of those might've come from far-lefties wanting revenge for being rejected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This.  I'm a Democrat but I could not take the Bernsters.  I'm sorry, but I paid for my college tuition by working and scholarships.  I know if I take out a loan, I have to pay it back and I did.  I know people who sent their kids off to college to places they really really could not afford.  That is not my responsibility to come with a bailout plan.  It's a debt.  Pay it back.  These pie in the skies ideas of his to have "free" college were never going to happen.  How many years did it take to get a national healthcare plan and now the Right is bent on dismantling it.  No way we're going to have free college.  And I've gotten into arguments with WAY far Left people who say - well, the more EDUCATION that people get the more likely they're going to be DEMOCRAT!  I'm like, UH.  I get the reasoning, but not really.  I know plenty of Republicans who were very well educated and are racist, dumb, and can't find the United States on a map and think Obama was born in Kenya.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

If that's so, then why do you have people on the right who keep insisting that he (and Kamala) are socialists, no matter how much or how often we keep insisting they're not?  Because, we aren't doing enough (IMO) to repudiate the far-left.  We keep letting them inside, in the name of bringing everyone under the same tent, instead of barring the [!@#$%^&*] doors against them.  We need to make it clear, or clearer, that their brand of progressive activism has no place in EITHER party, or we're gonna keep having close elections with razor-thin margins such as this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Leftists are right about a few things, one of them being that it doesn't matter how moderate a Democrat claims to be, many will still see them as a socialist. That doesn't mean I think Bernie was a better choice than Biden (I think Biden was one of the very, very, very few Democrats who could have won against Trump [if he wins]), but in places like Staten Island, Oklahoma, South Carolina, rural districts of Minnesota, etc. it wouldn't have mattered if Zombie Reagan was the House Speaker. There are some places that were going to be difficult to hold in an election year, especially against a figure like Trump who is beloved by many in these areas. I do think House Democrats bought into their own polling too much and got too overconfident, which, again, Biden's campaign people never did. 

 

Another thing I find myself agreeing with more and more with some on the left about is the establishment Democrats who are addicted to being in tears over how powerless they are. I cringed all the way through a long tweet thread a little while ago with Paul Krugman basically going on about how Biden winning was meaningless. So many people sacrificed their money, their time, their mental health, and potentially their lives to make this happen. That type of talk, especially from privileged people, makes me just say kiss my ass. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's far from meaningless when you remember what Biden can and will do about ICE and those children in cages on Day One. Day. One. So yeah, agreed, folks can miss me with that talk.

 

But I think AOC's clip above from last year is the core of the issue and always has been. And she's right, and I've said it before: The work is ahead of us, and it always was.

 

Meanwhile, in the bunker:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

We can't control what the right calls us. We can only keep pointing out that it's not true. The problem is that the left keeps sabotaging us and the right will always use that. You can't keep blaming our side for the fact that Republicans want to kill us and that the socialists want to help them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

AOC is not here to help. She's here to sabotage. She talks a good game but she will ALWAYS do what is most harmful to the Democratic party. That's her default setting. She doesn't really want to do her job. She just likes the spotlight. Frankly I'm looking forward to when she loses her district.

 

That said, it did hit me today that now we can get those kids out of cages. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy