Jump to content

Coronation Street: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Today they would probably say that isn't a "big" exit, and she would be killed off or go to prison or whatever.

There's a real sense of loss and heartbreak throughout the breaking of all her relationships on the Street, yet - much like Elsie years earlier (even though Elsie had a happier exit) - we know she'll be fine, because she has herself, and ultimately she's only survived because of herself.

I do wish they'd bring her back for a bit, as the show is so sparse on vets and no longer has a sense of identity. Bring back the living Rovers waitresses (I'd say landlords/landladies but it's just her and that awful flop Stella) for some ceremony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

In today's world, Hilda Ogden's exit (which, IMO, is probably the best ever exit given to a beloved long-running character on a soap) would be lambasted for being "boring" and "playing it safe." Corrie used to do great and classy exits for its veteran characters once upon a time.

I do think there is a lot of life left in Bet, even in her short 2002 return, she stole every scene. They don't make characters like that anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fans seemed to be out for her blood after the whole Roy business earlier this year.

Corrie doesn't seem to actually get rid of characters unless the actors quit, but sometimes I do wonder if the only Windass left will be Gary and his well-packed jeans.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hate that mushmouth Owen and his bad dye job so much (he's another reason I stopped watching Corrie - yet ANOTHER failed Collinson character [did Collinson have any characters who weren't failures?]). I did want to see Lorraine from Eastenders, as I was a big fan of hers back then. I even liked her pointless role on Hollyoaks (which was then taken over by, of all people, the wonderful Samantha Giles, since she and Jacqueline Leonard have so much in common!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know some fans would say the early 90s were the last truly great period of the show, up to about 1994 or so.

I guess I have to get around to watching more of that era. To be honest some of the characters heavily featured then just exhaust me somewhat (like Mike and the Macdonalds).

I wish more of the 60s was on Youtube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There seemed to be an understated quality about the show in these years, which changed by the late 90's when it felt like the entire program was revamped to be more sensationalized.

The McDonald's do annoy me somewhat (in a way that's similar to how I feel about the Carter's on EastEnders these days), but they do at least seem authentic. Also, am I the only one who preferred Andy over Steve?

And of course, I am loving Bet during this era, even if Alec disturbs me with the way he treats her at times.

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always liked Andy better too. I thought he was a more believable character. I also liked his droll humor. Unfortunately the actor was a part of one of those idiotic "Corrie has too many gays!" articles so I'm not sure they'll ever have him back (of course he'd aged badly, but I did like it when he popped up for visits).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I sometimes see fans go on now about the good old days of the Freshco siege (1999, 2000), and so on, but to me that era of the show was just anathema to most of what made Corrie stand out. It's so needlessly grim and so generic, like something airlifted in from the last years of Brookside.

Corrie can be both quaint and contemporary, but most showrunners seem to have no idea how to do this anymore. I guess 2002-2004 or so, flaws and all, were the last years they sort of did.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even in the midst of his living hell, David still managed to get the best line of the night by telling Nick to run over Gail when she stopped them from leaving to confront Callum. The way he said it, killed me. Jack P. Shepherd spits out those dark, sarcastic lines brilliantly time and time again.

Jenny's return is off to a good start. Did Jenny really have a crush on Kevin back in the day or was that just something they made up tonight? They do have chemistry, [Annie Sugden] any road [/Annie Sugden].

Monday's episodes were in fine form. Sally was fantastic as usual these days. It was a great idea to get her involved in the Platt story, fearing she was going to prison. Surprisingly Sophie was pretty hilarious, too. "Why is there a stick on the table?" laugh.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy