Jump to content

Writer's Strike Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

McTavish is apart of the WGA and is on strike, so no, Sony and CBS can't legally hire her, so it isn't true.

Anyway, I also hope AMC can get a new HW and EP out of this strike. B&E have managed to do something McTavish never did - bring AMC to last place in the ratings. AMC is truly the worst and most unrecognizable soap on the air at the moment, and that's saying something. I also get the feeling that TPTB don't want this show to recover, I feel like Frons is just itching to cancel it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not sure if this was posted already and I missed it, but did anyone catch Carolyn Hinsey's completely back-asswards write-up on the strike in SOD? I don't know why I'm surprised. The woman has turned being wrong into a career.

While she's not wrong about the damage that can/will be done to daytime if the strike continues, how can she say the internet isn't affecting soaps? Days is on iTunes! All the CBS soaps are up on CBS.com WITH commercials (hence, advertising revenue). And NBC is now producing ONLINE SOAP OPERAS!!!!

Man, pass me what she's smoking...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hinsey's statements regarding the strike and that soap scribes should be exempt from a battle that potentially affects them(INTERNET!) is not only ignorant, but it shows that she gets off on making blind statements that piss people off.

If soaps did die out, at least it would eliminate the need for her stupid columns, along with the rest of her asskissing peers at Weekly and Digest.

I've been officially over that cow for awhile now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hinsey's statements regarding the strike and that soap scribes should be exempt from a battle that potentially affects them(INTERNET!) is not only ignorant, but it shows that she gets off on making blind statements that piss people off.

If soaps did die out, at least it would eliminate the need for her stupid columns, along with the rest of her asskissing peers at Weekly and Digest.

I've been officially over that cow for awhile now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And of course, nothing will happen to her for writing something patentedly false.

Why? Because the soap rags are "just" the soap rags. It's "just" soap journalism. Nobody can be expected to care or bother getting anything right. She'll come back with "so I might've been slightly off in my comments about the strike - what can I do, I'm Carolyn Hinsey, it's just my opinion, lemme lone, yada yada yada! Now, about Maurice..."

I am so sick of that [!@#$%^&*].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

November 26, 2007

Alternative Journalist’s Web Site Is Scrutinized for Writers’ Strike News

By BRIAN STELTER

When some striking members of the Writers Guild of America created a series of videos depicting speechless actors in support of the writers’ cause, they did not post them on the guild’s Web site or on YouTube. Instead, the videos made their premiere exclusively on Deadline Hollywood Daily, a Web site owned and operated by Nikki Finke, a columnist for the alternative newspaper LA Weekly.

Since she began the site in 2006, Ms. Finke’s Web site has become a critical forum for Hollywood news and gossip, known for analyzing (in sometimes insulting terms) the behind-the-scenes maneuvering of moguls.

But it has been the screenwriters’ strike that may have finally solidified her position as a Hollywood power broker. For this article, more than a dozen executive producers, writers and agents offered to attest to her influence. But with those plaudits also come complaints — only anonymous ones — that Ms. Finke plays favorites.

“Like it or not, everyone in Hollywood reads her,” said Brad Grey, the chief executive of Paramount and, like many executives, an occasional target of Ms. Finke’s scathing reports. “You must respect her reach.”

For many of her readers, Ms. Finke’s Web site has supplanted traditional media as a primary source of strike news. Before the strike, Ms. Finke said Deadline Hollywood Daily averaged 350,000 page views a day. Since the beginning of the strike, she said the daily average had soared to about a million.

Ms. Finke said the size of the audience began to sink in when Bill Wrubel, a writer for the ABC series “Ugly Betty,” started a chant on the picket lines outside Raleigh Studios comparing her with two other industry publications, Variety and The Hollywood Reporter.

“Variety and The Reporter stink. We get our news from Nikki Finke,” Mr. Wrubel chanted.

Ms. Finke, who works from her Los Angeles town house, has repeatedly assailed coverage by other outlets, particularly Variety, for, she maintains, running articles slanted toward the studios’ interests.

“They have been reporting stories that are fantastical,” Ms. Finke said in an interview. “What they are doing is kind of old-fashioned fear mongering.”

Dozens of readers responded to her post, saying they were canceling their Variety subscriptions.

Tim Gray, the editor of Variety, said his colleagues are used to criticism. “There is constant noise from bloggers,” he acknowledged, “but we just tend to our business and check our facts.”

Ms. Finke’s criticism of Variety has opened her to accusations that she is siding with the writers. She strongly disagrees, and said she has repeatedly reached out to the studios to include their points of view. As a columnist, Ms. Finke expressed opposition to a strike, writing on Oct. 16 that posting on a labor action is something “I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy.”

However, since the strike began, Ms. Finke has published 142 posts about it. She said she had worked almost around the clock for three weeks, and had fallen asleep at the computer four times. She estimated she had received 2,000 e-mail messages a day.

“It’s been brutal, but it’s also been exhilarating because I love news. I love it — a scoop is better than sex,” she said.

Ms. Finke, a onetime debutante in New York City, honed her journalism skills at The Associated Press, working in London and Moscow — “covering Hollywood is no different than covering the Kremlin,” she said — before stints at Newsweek, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Observer, New York magazine and The New York Post. She was fired from The Post in 2002 after writing negative articles about Disney; she sued the newspaper’s parent News Corporation and settled for an undisclosed amount.

After years of writing about media corporations for media corporations, Ms. Finke said she now feels an incredible independence.

“I don’t think I’m a better journalist than anybody else,” she said. “I don’t think I’m a harder-working journalist than anybody else. I do think I have a forum where I have more freedom than anybody else.”

To a lesser extent, national newspapers and Los Angeles television stations have also fallen under Ms. Finke’s microscope. Calling them “newsosaurs,” she argues that major media outlets are wary of being too tough on studios because they benefit from movie and television advertising.

Ms. Finke benefits from their advertising indirectly, as LA Weekly pays for the right to place banner ads on her Web site. She would not comment on how much she makes from the site, only that she doesn’t “live the high life.”

“Her influence cannot be overstated,” said Jon Robin Baitz, executive producer of the ABC drama “Brothers and Sisters,” calling her “perhaps the greatest Kremlinologist and reader of tea leaves” in Hollywood.

Justin Stangel, a head writer for “The Late Show With David Letterman,” summarized the sentiment on his strike blog, saying: “I feel like I am having an affair with Nikki Finke. I am spending much more time with her than my wife.”


" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/26/business...t;

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carolyn Hinsey......she's what's wrong with the soap business now. She placates the networks, refusing to criticize then when she actually should, yet she chastises the fans for doing so. I'm so sick of her and her useless freakin opinion. I wouldn't use her column to wipe my rear......

I'm so sick of people who have the power (even remotely) to shine the light on the things the networks do wrong, doing nothing. She has an outlet that reaches out to a couple million people, and yet all she does is stroke the networks like a whore making rent.

People on the internet are accused of being rabid and negative. Some are, but for the most part, being critical now is being considered negative. Knowing that things have to get worse before they get better, and wanting things to change are now considered "bad" among some fans. Why? Because they are perfectly content with the way things are. Perfectly content watching the substandard, asshat agenda based writing, that pimps their faves, while alienating the audience who likes more than just "the chosen."

I'm so sick of this [!@#$%^&*].....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Hinsey's comments are that ridiculous. People keep saying the internet is the future of soaps, but I think that is a load of crap. Yes, we'll get crap like L.A. Diaries and Coastal Dreams, but is anybody on this site watching them? I bet the nets are LOSING money on those two soaps. If anything, we'll have more internet soaps like that, geared towards tweens.

We will never see any of the current soaps exclusively on the internet. It would make the budget cuts for PSNS and GL look like a blockbuster movie budget. Plus, do you see Susan Lucci, Maurice Benard, Kim Zimmer, Maura West, Susan Flannery or Eric Braeden doing an internet soap? Absolutely ridiculous.

If soaps can't make it on network or cable, they're dead. I'm sure the PGP Soap Channel will continue, so ATWT & GL fans can continue to enjoy their soaps. The rest? Forget it. If studios won't release soaps on DVD while they're on the air and can cross promote, they won't do it after they were cancelled for lack of interest.

I'd be willing to bet they're making pennies off of the CBS soaps streaming. I hope the writers get their fair share, but if daytime writers suspect anything significant , they're nuts. THis fight is good for them if they plan to go into primetime and film, but it will never been a soap fight, IMO. In the end, after they split it between 10 writers, they'll probably have a check for $5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I will admit to not liking John Bolger in the role of Phillip, but on rewatch, he has a really nice friend chemistry with Michael and Krista. And I think it's the only period of time where Phillip hasn't pulled Rick into some stupid scheme that ends up hurting the friendship.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      You're right about everything! The casino needs to go and it's ugly! The ugliest set on BTG.
    • Jayne Bentzen is the actress who played Nicole at that point. She joined Edge the year before, replacing Maeve McGuire.
    • Wait.....Anita is an EGOT, Vernon was an important Senator, and Dani was an international model (no matter how brief, although I thought she said she was on par with Tyra Banks(or someone)...meanwhile, Nicole's some nice psychologist/psychiatrist with an award on her wall...but Dani's hasn't added to the Dupree mystique?  I don't think the writers considered ever having any Dupree be less than utterly fabulously successful  and that's actually flaw in the structure of the show.  Oh, I forgot to say...Smitty acts like she stumbled into Vanessa's Only Fans account and paid for a picture of her dirty undies before realizing it was her.
    • I watched another batch of episodes and I have a sense of dread. I fear they are setting up a murder storyline with one of my favorite characters as the victim. I don't know if that would be considered a spoiler so won't reveal the character. If that's so, i will be extremely disappointed as this person has done Emmy caliber work and would create such a void on the show.  If I'm right, I think I know who the suspect will be and I would rather the suspect be murdered.  Joel Crothers's Miles has had more of a presence with his wife Nicole and I enjoy both actors. Crothers is just so yummy and charismatic. Don't know who plays Nicole but I like their relationship.  Ann Williams has been phenomenal as Margo. Margo is desperate to keep Eliot and make April happy. Williams had a nice scene with Kibbee's Geraldine about Logan and the baby. Eliot has been so slimy and menacing but he's so watchable. April and Draper are still fighting over the baby and something has happened to April to land her in the hospital. I just keep hoping she'll kick Draper out. The man is such a pain. Raven needs to come back and sleep with him. She can liven him up. Ann Flood and Frances Fisher had a wonderfully written scene where Deborah confesses her feelings for Owen. The writing and acting for this scene was first-rate. I want more of Flood. It's good to see Fisher getting more to do. Steve and his low cut shirts have been sidelined lately. The writers are setting up a Deborah/Nola confrontation.  Paige and Brian are still pretty much an afterthought. The movie plot is coming along nicely and there was a great episode where Margo had a party for the movie at her penthouse. Still enjoying the show. 
    • See, I imagine it as some kind of "private" room within a bigger casino.
    • I like Nicole for several reasons, she has all the good attributes and qualities of a good person. You have to be a huge hater to dislike someone like her. I consider Dani an underdog. She had a lot to live up to and she hasn't contributed to the family name imo. Naomi and Martin seem to had more flourishing careers than she has.  She might've had a long marriage, but Bill cheated on her left and right. I am sure they had some good times, but I wouldn't call it a great marriage or anything to brag about. She modeled for what 2/3 years? That's not that successful, especially if she didn't pivot to something more lucrative. And that is the real reason she plays momanger cause she is living through Chelsea. Dani is nothing without her family name. Nicole doesn't need the Dupree; she made her own mark! And that's what you should do when you're born with privilege, flip that [!@#$%^&*]! The opportunity is there for the writers to play up her insecurities and resentment issues, but will they? There must've been a reason for her to choose Bill over someone with more status, or coming from another wealthy family. Right?  I don't expect everyone to understand her, but I do, and probably would've made her a more screw up and didn't amount to much outside having some kids.  The lack of crossover from the in-laws always bothered me, too. I hope at some point we get some family dinners. I know it's not earth-shattering entertainment, but I'm a sucker for those scenes. And you can still move the story along, too! I forgot all about my boo Jacob, and he was on today. He, for some reason, reminds me of Garfield the cat! 

      Please register in order to view this content

      You're right about that hetero bio son Dupree, though.  
    • The casino set needs to be upgraded or needs to go. Why would anyone rich spend their time in the wood paneled 1960’s room instead of just playing cards in what I assume is the normal nice looking casino area.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy