Jump to content

Writer's Strike Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Feb 11 2008, 07:11 PM)
I don't think Corday is the big bad people think he is, the interviews with Peter Brash and Casiello have backed me up on that. Sheffer on the other hand did the exact same things with vets on ATWT and admitted he didn't know how to write for the over 40 crowd. Was Corday producing that show? No. It was Hogan and Chris Goutman.

Not using the vets, focusing on a few characters, tons of teens and lots of newbies is what Hogan was doing his last few years at ATWT.

Hogan was nothing without Carolyn Culliton at his side at ATWT. When she left, the whole show started to lose its spark, despite MADD firing some of the male writers on the team. At DAYS, Hogan NEVER had anyone as strong as Carolyn to rely on, and no one on his writing team had extensive history writing for DAYS or understanding the show's complexed history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I've seen that he's capable of great scenes. I've seen that he's capable of great episodes. I've seen that's he's occasionally capable of great weeks. At no point have I seen that he's capable of a strong STORY with a beginning, middle and end. He's better suited as a breakdown or scriptwriter, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Feb 11 2008, 06:11 PM)
I don't think Corday is the big bad people think he is, the interviews with Peter Brash and Casiello have backed me up on that. Sheffer on the other hand did the exact same things with vets on ATWT and admitted he didn't know how to write for the over 40 crowd. Was Corday producing that show? No. It was Hogan and Chris Goutman.

Not using the vets, focusing on a few characters, tons of teens and lots of newbies is what Hogan was doing his last few years at ATWT.

Ummm..yeah Brash and Casiello are going to say Corday was evil. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

February 12, 2008

News Analysis


Who Won the Writers Strike?

By DAVID CARR

When the Writers Guild of America held its annual awards ceremony Saturday night in Manhattan, it felt more like a victory celebration. So after a long and bitter strike, the writers won, right?

On points, yes, probably. On principle, certainly. From a practical perspective, maybe not so much.

True, the writers guild was able to wrest a major concession from management — winning a piece of digital revenues — the kind of victory that has largely eluded organized labor in the past few years.

Tony Gilroy, the writer and director of “Michael Clayton,” who was there as a nominee, argued that, while the strike had been punishing, it was clearly necessary.

“As writers and directors, we have our nose in the tent for real for the first time,” he said. “There are question marks about how it will be implemented, but there is no one who can argue that the strike was not necessary. We would never be in the position we are without it. Anybody who says the strike was a bad idea is dead wrong.”

It is equally true, however, that the strike was bad for writers in the short term. The delays caused by the strike prompted the studios to ask themselves a fundamental question about the need to finance all manner of pilots for a traditional upfront extravaganza followed by a traditional introduction in the fall. That system, fairly unchanged through the years, has historically been lucrative for writers.

Emboldened by the strike, the studios severed existing contracts with writers, successfully turned over more of their prime-time schedules to reality programming and vowed to hold the line on filming new shows for next season.

Some 70 development deals in which writers were essentially paid lucrative stipends to come up with shows that might not ever be broadcast are now gone, and they will not be coming back any time soon.

The events are likely to bring at least a few lean years to the workaday writers. With less spending on pilots, established writers will be in the hunt because they lost their cushy deals on the lot. With increased incursion from all forms of reality programs, finding work that pays the bills, never mind the residuals, is going to be a slog.

Will the studios stick to their new vows of restraint? Perhaps there’s an instructive comparison with another business run by big egos in search of talent, Major League Baseball.

Every few years, the baseball owners announce that there’s a new austerity in the air and that they won’t overspend on players. But just before spring training starts, they get nervous and suddenly a pitcher like Ted Lilly — the baseball equivalent of an assistant gag writer on “Two and a Half Men” — gets something like $10 million.

One studio executive interviewed Monday (who, like every studio executive, declined to be identified while saying anything negative about the people he will be dealing with everyday) said that the writer’s short-term pain wasn’t necessary, that they could have had a deal without the acrimonious strike.

That may not quite track. By taking a reflexively hard line in the negotiations from the start, the studios more or less invited the strike, calculating that the writers, a disparate group with varying interests, would quickly splinter. They guessed wrong: despite constant suggestions that cracks were appearing, the center held.

One of the longer-term consequences of the strike that studios will now have to deal with is a group that is remarkably united — from the show runners in possession of lucrative deals to mostly unemployed writers fighting to get into the business.

“I think that you would have to say that the strike was a qualified success, if for no other reason that they kept solidarity among the show runners and the rank and file,” said Jonathan Handel, an entertainment lawyer at the TroyGould firm who formerly worked for the guild.

Still, the question remains for the writers: will the piece of future digital revenues they captured be worth the grief endured these past few months? It won’t be in the near future. Advertisers are so much less valuable on the Web, and the real money remains in so-called legacy media.

The negotiating committee for the writers is proud that they were able to establish a percentage payment on the distributor’s gross, but that win will be largely symbolic unless there is a fundamental change in the economics of digital distribution.

Clearly, the studios think there is some kind of future there. Buried in the small type Monday was an announcement by Viacom’s studio Paramount that it will create a division to develop programming for wireless devices (i.e., iPhone). It’s hard to picture a situation where little programs for tiny screens will kick up the kind of network salaries and residuals that have been the mother’s milk of writers for decades.

Still, the writers got their foot in the door, a much better outcome than many observers believed possible. And that means the writers are now joined at the hip with the producers in finding out just what the future holds. Perhaps at the next awards show, they should toast their new partners and pray it works out for both of them.

What about viewers — the real victims of the strike, deprived of new episodes of “Heroes”? There was some keening on the message boards, but mostly, the public shrugged and worked on their “Guitar Hero” chops.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/12/arts/television/12strike.html?ref=television&pagewanted=print

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Strike Fallout: A Complete Guide To How Your Favorite Shows Are Affected

By Brian Stelter

The writers’ strike may be almost over, and many television shows should resume production soon, but viewers will not see new episodes on network schedules immediately.

“Networks will not have a lot of time to make judgments on existing shows” between now and next fall’s scheduling announcements in May, Bill Carter reports. “Several network executives said the best these shows could offer is four to six new episodes for drama series and perhaps as many as eight for the comedies. And some shows may not be brought back at all.”

Here’s how your favorite shows are affected. The information is subject to change, so check back frequently for updates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Writers Guild board approves tentative contract

As guild members vote, show runners get OK to resume work.

By Richard Verrier, Claudia Eller and Maria Elena Fernandez

Los Angeles Times Staff Writers

February 11, 2008


Movie and television writers began casting their ballots Sunday on whether to end their 3-month-old strike, a vote that is likely to send the entertainment industry back to work Wednesday.

The action followed Sunday's unanimous decision by the board and negotiating committee of the Writers Guild of America to bless a tentative contract reached with studios over the weekend. The guild's 10,500 movie and TV writers are expected to ratify the new three-year agreement within 12 days.

Top show runners, however, were given the green light by the guild to return to work today in their capacity as producers, which means they can hire crews and prepare their series to go before the cameras.

Shawn Ryan, show runner of "The Shield" and "The Unit," literally couldn't wait to go back to work. He spent Sunday night viewing cuts from the pilot of "The Oaks," of which he is executive producer, and the last four episodes of "The Shield," which will begin its final season later this year.

"It's really unusual," Ryan said. "I've kind of gotten used to not working. Honestly, I'm very happy that we were able to strike a deal that was fair and was amenable to our side and their side, and that we all get to go back and do the work that we love."

The strike shut down more than 60 shows, idled thousands of production workers and squeezed scores of local businesses that rely heavily upon the entertainment industry for their livelihoods.

News of the approaching end to the work stoppage brought a collective sigh of relief across the region.

"It's thrilling news that the strike may be over," said Harvey Schwartz, founder of North Hollywood-based 20th Century Props, who estimated that his business lost $250,000 and laid off a dozen employees because of the strike. "I might be able to keep my present employees and even hire back some."

Added Michael Page, manager of Mo's restaurant on Riverside Drive in Burbank: "We're definitely grateful that the strike is over. We're right down the street from the studios, so it certainly impacted us."

Crew members were also elated. "We just want to get back to work," said Deborah Huss Humphries, a makeup artist. "I've missed working."

The resolution comes in the nick of time to save the Feb. 24 telecast of the Academy Awards, which now can happen without the threat of picketers outside the event, a paucity of stars on the red carpet and the absence of writers to pen jokes for the presenters. It also means the networks will finally be able to begin developing new shows for next season.

At a news conference Sunday at the Writers Guild of America, West headquarters in the Fairfax district, guild leaders touted their new contract as a landmark agreement that demonstrated the union's newfound clout and secured for writers a foothold in the emerging world of online entertainment.

"This is the best deal the guild has bargained for in 30 years," said Patric M. Verrone, president of the West Coast guild. "It's not all we hoped for, and it's not all we deserve, but . . . this deal assures for us and for future generations a share in the future."

The agreement doubles the rate that writers are paid for movie and TV shows sold online, establishes the union's jurisdiction over programming created for the Internet and for the first time provides payment for entertainment that is streamed on websites.

It was modeled after a similar agreement that studios struck with directors last month.

Verrone and other guild leaders praised the executives who took over the negotiations for the studios, News Corp. President Peter Chernin and Walt Disney Co. Chairman Robert A. Iger.

"We spent nearly three months with the [studio] labor executives getting nowhere," Verrone said. The executives' involvement "was instrumental in making this deal happen."

Verrone also tipped his hat to a show of solidarity from other unions, especially the Screen Actors Guild, whose members supported writers in boycotting the Golden Globes last month. Actors are poised to enter their own negotiations with studios to replace a contract that expires June 30.

Many had expected that the strike would end today. But at a membership meeting at the Shrine Auditorium on Saturday night, Verrone told 3,500 writers that the board would not lift the strike until members had the opportunity to weigh in.

The board had the authority to end the strike today. But many writers felt they should first have a say in the matter, given that they had voted to authorize the strike in the first place and rigorously supported it on the picket lines.

Under guild rules, members must be given 48 hours to vote on whether to end a strike. Notices went out midday Sunday informing writers that they could cast ballots in person Tuesday at polling locations on both coasts. Members unable to vote in person were allowed to send proxy ballots by fax beginning Sunday. Results will be announced Tuesday night.

A settlement would also be welcomed by TV viewers, who are eager to see some of their favorite shows return to the air with fresh episodes and are hoping midseason shows such as "Lost" will have complete runs.

But first the producers and writers have their work cut out for them.

Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, the show runners of "Lost," will today begin the complicated task of figuring out what they should do with the second half of their season. When the strike began, eight episodes of the fourth season had been completed, and the producers don't know how many new episodes ABC will want to air before the TV season ends in the spring.

"We have to look at all the notes that were taken right before we left in terms of what we're going to do creatively for the remainder of the season and refresh our memory a little," Lindelof said. "I feel like we're sort of native French speakers who have been away from the country for three months and we're going back to France tomorrow and our diction is going to be a little sloppy."

[email protected]

[email protected]

maria.elena.fernandez@ latimes.com

Times staff writer Meg James contributed to this report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Apparently, Michael Bruno predicted yesterday that two Head Writers were going to lose their jobs once the strike was resolved. It's pretty much a given that B&E will be one, since FiCore status probably affects their employment as Head Writer's after the strike, could Latham be the other one? :)

We already know Hogan and team are gone, so I don't think he's referring to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The way Andre held Dani afterwards, be still my heart. They think its only booty call hook ups, but I'm sensing a love slowly growing.  Way too much booty popping LOL.
    • I'm just pleased the homeless plotline has a point. I'm surprised they're going here this soon with the kids.
    • All caught up on May 2025, and it was rough. Truly rough. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'll focus on the positives: 1. VP has been an unexpected addition to the cast. I wasn't thrilled that Amy had been recast simply to eliminate her. Gotta give props that Josh saw more. Amy actually works as the glue for the Winters/Hastings family. The surprise Audra/Amy relationship has added depth to both characters. 2. Victor/Phyllis. It was fun to watch Victor undercut every single Phyllis pitch/bluff. MS played this well. No way Phyllis can get away with histrionics with Victor. It was a nice touch that Victor acknowledged Phyllis' trauma, but that he knows her all to well. 3. Chelsea reading Billy. MCE is being wasted when Chelsea is a victim. Look at how much more interesting Chelsea has been challenging Billy and Adam. Please bring Chelsea back to life. Same with Adam. 4. Anyone else notice that AG sometimes plays this homoerotic vibe with Adam/Billy. Like that look he gave Billy when Adam exited the bar. Since it's neither actor was there during the Delia s/l, it's just a lot tougher to sell the animosity. Since she's always been there, EH's pain with all the Adam's sticks.
    • 1) A-M had an inferiority complex when it came to Phillip. Alan had adopted Phillip (his wife Elizabeth had a stillbirth, Alan then had the babies switched) and always favored him. When A-M came to town, he got involved with Blake as his marriage to Harley was disintergrating, and Blake was married to Phillip at the time (but that marriage was crumbling because a) Beth was alive and b ) Blake kept that from Phillip). But by the time Phillip left town in '91, he and Alan-Michael were on good terms. So whatever A-M's referring to is writer laziness to further this plot. 2) Meredith Reade Bauer was Fletch's sister and Rick's ex-wife. Their marriage broke up after she discovered she couldn't have any more children. After a fight, Meredith and Phillip slept together, she got pregnant. Right before they got married, Rick realized, thanks to a sonogram, that he couldn't be the father. I believe Meredith just told him it was a random ONS, and he accepted that. Meredith had complications, and Rick couldn't decide whether to save her life or the baby's. He asked Phillip to decide for him, and Phillip chose Meredith. It wasn't until after that Rick found out that Phillip was the father, and had chosen Rick's wife over his child.  Not sure why Rick/Blake were "at odds", other than by that time Blake had married Ross, who was Phillip's biological uncle. Phillip's bio parents are Justin and Jackie Marler. 3) Back in '90, Phillip was accused of killing Beth's ex-lover Neil Everest. (Neil was killed by a bomb he planted the night of The Towers opening. He had planned to kill Phillip (and there's some weird twist where Neil had killed his wife and her children in a building collapse or something...but anyway..)  But Gary Swanson (who was plotting with Neil for some strange reason) knocked Neil out and saved Phillip.  Neil had already planted evidence implicating Phillip in the bombing (to make it look like he had been caught in his own trap), so he was charged.  Phillip, Beth and Rick faked Phillp's death. Rick and Phillip planted a cadaver and burned it in a car to make it look like an accident. Beth was pregnant with Lizzie at the time. To divert suspicion, (Mallet was already skeptical that Phillip was alive) Rick and Beth married, which upset Mindy (who was trying to start things back up with Rick) and knew nothing about the plot. When it all came out, Rick, Beth and Phillip were all given community service, and I believe Rick's MD license was suspended. Beth and Phillip went to Arizona, and Rick (I think) first got help from his uncle Mike to start community service out of state.   
    • I can't answer 1 & 3, but I can answer this: Meredith is Fletcher's sister. She's a doctor. She and Rick fell in love. At one of the Bauer 4th of July BBQs, they had a fight. She ran into Phillip at a bar and the two of them ended up having sex. Rick and Meredith reconciled and...you guessed it, she turned up pregnant. She didn't know for sure who the father was but she let Rick think it was his. Just before their wedding, he saw a sonogram picture. Being a doctor, he could tell how far along she was and realized he wasn't the father. He still went through with the ceremony (why, don't ask me) and afterwards confronted her about it. She told him she picked up a stranger at a bar. Rick was bitter about it but he still stayed with her. Eventually, the secret came out. Rick was furious about Phillip betraying him. Still, he stayed with Meredith (again, why, I don't know). She had a stillbirth and was left barren. Meredith finally decided to leave him and left SF for good. Rick was awful to her, including after losing the baby. Just was a creep about it. It was hard for me to ever like the character after this storyline. I don't knowl if one of the writers strikes was going on during this story, but it was so, so bad. Rick and Meredith had no chemistry. The way Rick stayed with her, the way she stayed with him, made zero sense to me.  
    • Going back to 1980s Minneapolis sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • 2 kids...its Tyrell and Samantha
    • There was tension between Alan-Michael and Philip because Alan-Michael was sympathetic to Blake (and married her) after Philip left her to chase after an amnesiac Beth, but the show exaggerated that tension when Philip returned. Meredith was Fletcher's sister. She was a doctor. Rick was married to her. Philip slept with her. She got pregnant with his child. When the truth came out, Meredith lost the baby, and she and Rick split up. I think Philip had faked his death to escape murder charges (with Rick stealing a corpse to help him). Someone else will remember more.
    • He has nothing left to do on B&B. He's still written as this perfect angelic godlike person who has bad luck with women.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy