Jump to content

Anyone think Lorraine Broderick should return to AMC?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'd be SOO sad if JFP ever came to Pine Valley...

Yah I'd take Broderick back in a heartbeat. It's interesting many of the old episodes I have of AMC from the early 80s list her as the head writer, despite no official credit to the fact. I also thought her era, despite shrinking ratings, in 96-98 was brilliant even with a few story duds.

I was away in europe for much of her era co-HW OLTL but she never seemed to gell there, what did peopel think of her work on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gary Tomlin injected a campy flare into OLTL, while the show had some misses, it was generally a good era for OLTL imo. Totally ahead of the crapfest JFP and McTavish had prior and better than what come later. There was a lot more humor on the show and the dialogue was GREAT. One thing with Broderick, the shows she head-writes generally always shine in the dialogue department. It was also this era where OLTL won its first and only Emmy for Outstanding Drama Series. Though it wasn't all good, but this era in OLTL's history was definitely a breath of fresh air, since the show had been in rapid decline for years prior to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

YES!

Broderick is my #1 favorite soap writer. She truly knows AMC; her stories have always struck me as raw and realistic. Hell, even the wacky stuff she was forced to do by the network -- Voodoo, Santa Claus -- included sincere emotion and we're basically in-character for those involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

got that right. The only concern I would have is that Frons micromanges the soaps too much these days. Im not sure if she'd be given the freedom that she truly wants but instead would just be an extension of Frons and JHC. I could see Broderick leaving on her own bc of "creative differences"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just have to reiterate -- I LOVED HER LAST TENURE AT AMC! There was a witty sense of humor about the show that's been missing all of these years. Not only that, but LB was very into developing relationships, both romantic and friendly. She created the Erica/Skye/Janet trio and it worked. Also the Erica/Esther friendship was great, too. The contrasts of those friendships gave Erica a more human feel. Yeah, she was this big time cosmetics exec, former model and celebrity, but she had "real" friends. I loved the development of Adam and Liza under Broderick, as well. The scenes with Adam, Marian and Liza were hilarious.

Also, under Broderick, you got the sense that you were watching real people and they actually did all live in the same town. There was no "Star" no "hero" no "saint." It was just people living their lives and dealing with their issues and relationships.

Now, this whole "let's have Ryan be all-knowing, all powerful, heroic GOD" crap is on my last nerve.

As much as I enjoy Zendall, this should NOT be the Zendall/Ryannie show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes I would love for Broderick to return but I doubt she will since it is clear she dislikes Frons. They offered her the head writing gig for AMC in 2003 but she refused and I cannot see her writing under a hack like Frons. But it would be wonderful if she could come back...ABC just needs to get it together and can Frons and bring in Felicia Minei Behr as president.

As much as I enjoyed the first few weeks of B&E, they really have not captivated me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, we need Broderick to come back and fix the current crap!

I hope JFP never comes near AMC. It's gotten bad enough the past few years and she would just kill it.

I can understand why Broderick wouldn't work for Frons. It's been obvious the past few years from his quotes about AMC that he has no clue what used to make this show so great.

ITA that B&E came on strong in the first few weeks by delving more deeply into the characters, especially Greenlee, than anyone had in years, but they've since petered out. The show is nearly as unwatchable now as it was under McT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Frons showed with the hiring of B&E that old AMC is no longer AMC. I think at best he wants an improved version of McTavish's version of the show. That's the only way I can understand him picking B&E over Kay Alden. She did an excellent job of reviving Y&R after Bill Bell stepped down, revived several families and characters that were on the simmer. She had great humor, camp, romance and character driven drama. From her speech at MIT she seemed to REALLY want the job and to turn AMC around.

With all those positives working for Alden, if he'd turn he down, then he wouldn't even consider Broderick. From what I've read about her, AMC seems to be the soap for her and I'd love to see her get her hands on it again. As much as Frons may want to, how can he justify keeping B&E who have been duds since day one? The ratings were dropping with McTavish and are getting worse. I hope they don't wait too long like CBS did (still are) with ATWT (which is pretty dead ratings wise).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I love a smart literary reference in my soap dialogue, but I just laughed at that *picks up book* Martin: "Ralph Ellison--The Invisible Man."  Smitty: "I see you"

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I don't think Sandra Ferguson was fantastic but I thought she did well enough with the story she was given. She had chemistry with RKK and with Charles Grant and made it understandable why Amanda was torn between the two men. RKK leaving hurt the story but beyond that they didn't try hard enough to make Evan a viable character. After he was written out we just got the triangle with Olivia, which also wasn't viable because they wanted us to root for Sam/Amanda long after viewers had stopped caring.
    • Well at one point Aaron's contract with ABC guaranteed a new series on the schedule each year. I guess once his contract was up he was out the door. It would have been a huge financial commitment and as tastes changed and Aaron didn't ,ABC couldn't see the value. Spelling did have a number of flops along the way.  He always brought up Family as a counter to the criticism that his output was trashy but that's because Family was the only show among many that wasn't  trashy.
    • Passions also did this with Ethan and Sam...probably some other soaps (Billy and Dylan on GL, maybe). I am blanking through fatigue.
    • A-la Sonny shooting "Dominic", a.k.a. Dante... just, minus Dante shooting Gio.
    • Amanda getting pregnant didn't help character development and long term harmed the Sam and Amanda relationship. If this story came to be in 1984,  thoughts on Mary Page Keller playing Amanda instead of Sally and her husband Thomas Ian Griffith playing Sam instead of Catlin. And Jack Wagner as Evan. 
    • It's like all the K-Dramas or C-Dramas where the mother-in-law hates the daughter-in-law who's supposedly from a poor or less than privileged background, only to find out she's the long-lost chaebol daughter from an even richer family.  Maybe someone in the writer's room watches them like I do (mostly the recaps on YouTube) and decided to do that with a male slant? All kidding aside, this is par for the course in soaps where someone you think you hate turns out to be the family you never knew you had. Haha.
    • It's frustration the way Dante was acting. You truly don' t Jordan, I see. LOL!!  I really liked Briana Henry in the role.
    • The failure in communication is one-sided, and not mine. Despite being told repeatedly by me and others that what you may have read on other message boards, Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), and/or any other social media site, including those you apparently run, does not make the information true, nor should it be posted here on the SON Community whatsoever. If there's something you've seen/read elsewhere that is newsworthy and from a valid source, there's nothing wrong with sharing/linking to that source. This includes linking to articles from other websites like Deadline, Us Weekly, Soap Opera Digest, EW, PEOPLE, etc. For instance, if any of the aforementioned websites reported that Tabyana Ali renewed her contract, link to that site reporting the news and/or an interview discussing it. Ditto, if Tabyana Ali said something about her contract on social media.  Just saying "apparently," while providing no source other than your statement, does not make it so. This includes if you read it by someone on any social media site other than an official outlet's post, the actress in question, or the show that employs her.  Related, your use of the word "apparently" isn't the key issue here. It's the continued posting of misinformation and the nonchalant sharing of personal information, specifically medically, about real-life people. You KNOW what I'm talking about!
    • I like Brook Kerr. I think she plays Portia exactly the way she's supposed to be. With that being said, GH has thrown Portia under the bus from day one. The woman has suffered and made bad decisions all through her tenure.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy