Jump to content

DAYS: NY Post Inverview with Kola Boof!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I actually hope it is Patrick because in a way I want EJ to be good and to treat Sami well. She deserves that and maybe if someone comes after her she will grow up. I do like EJ being evil too because it would make a good redemption story for Sami. Brady is not horrible-the character is and maybe this will give him new life. I mean, honestly, I have seen worse actors then Brody and when he appeared evil on the island it fit him much better.

At the risk of sounding harsh, those that don't like this need to just shut up. There is no reason to condemn this especially since all the interview says is she is going to add evil characteristics to a male character and, in a sense, give him a god complex of sorts. In no way does it suggest someone is going to be raped or tortured. [!@#$%^&*] merely said that she was taking characterisitcs for Osama-not that she was making a character into Osama. Even if Days does something extreme with this, this is a daytime DRAMA. This is not and can;t be the Days of the 80's. It can never be. That is where JER ran into trouble trying to recreate the past. Sheri Anderson's Days are gone folks. Days needs to do good character driven stories. They will still have family ortiented stories but there needs to be stuff to drive story and having a evil character like this is a good way of doing it. The "Old" Days so many want will not work nowadays. You want to generate buzz and write quaility stuff that will drive the audience to the TV's and something like this will do it. I think this is a very creative idea and I applaud [!@#$%^&*] for doing it.

I just hate to see what these people complaining now will do when Sheffer comes a board. You aren't going to get fluff anymore and let's remember this is a new writing team-give them a chance. They will give the show the identity they want to and the identity they see fit.

Bottom line: all doubters need to give it a chance. KR is right-some are blowing this way out of proportion and I think the style of the interview is partly to blame for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That is Days's problem-it needs to be like them. Well, not GH but you get what I mean. The show needs to write good character-driven plot lines and has to have one big story to garner attention to drive people to the screens to hook them on all the other stories. The buss this creates could very well do that. Days needs to stop worrying about appeasing the supercouple fanbases all the time and needs to focus on writing good solid stuff. I am not saying break up couples or anything but they need to keep that out of their mind when writing because it holds the show back. A few of us knew this would happen-those complaining now will definitely complain about Sheffer too because he only focuses on writing solid stuff and not on making sure fanbases are appeased. That is why the man has emmys. I encourage those complaining right now to give it a chance but it is your choice. Days is doing the right thing with all this-it is needed IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IA with Phoenix and some others on this one. Give her and the writers a chance before condenming their work. If a couple breaks up, let it be because of a tradgedy. Or, they just fell out of love, instead of it always being because one party was too stupid to see that the thrid party in a triangle manipulated the circumstances in his/her favor, only to reunite with their true love once the person was exposed. All these characters need some damn common sense shoved back into them.

And, even though I am, and will always be a fan of B/H, J/M, S/K, and J/J, we have had one of our best couples in Days history because of a tradgedy. Roman and Marlena would not have gotten together if the writers at the time had of listen strickly to the fans. They wrote a very compelling story (D.J.'s death) and that split those two up. And, at the time, they were one of Days' best couples, but fans boght it becuase it was well written and well acted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly Roman. Some of Days's gretest couples came from breaking a couple up. Roman/John and Marlena is the best example.

If it well-acted and written, then in most cases it will succeed. That is why those doubters need to just try it and see and give things a well-deserved chance. This is not JER anymore and neither Boof or Sheffer has an history with Days so it is unfair to condemn their work even before you sample it.

I also here many of those complaining saying they want adventure and romance like the 80's. That won't work in today's daytime landscape. A good deal of the viewers now have different tastes. There is a reason why soaps like Y&R, ATWT, etc succeed and that is because they don't worry about the Bope, J&M, J&J, or whatever fanbases. I am not saying to ignore them. I am merely saying Sheffer and his team need to keep them out of mind and just write stories true to character and that work for the audiences they are trying to attract. So much of Days in the past few years has gotten watered down or destroyed due to backtracking to make the fanbases happy. Days does have to please them to an extent but when it gets to the point where before you can initiate any story Days needs to ensure fanbases are happy then something is wrong. If triangles or quads are done, they need to be done in moderation not like it is now. Days needs to make sure all the couples are not apart at once. They also need to take risks and not be afraid to try out new potential pairings or go in different directions like this whole evil streak a male character is going to develop.

The Days of the 80's and early 90's is gone. That is where soaps are screwing themselves-by trying to re-create their magic periods. Days got into trouble under JER and GH is in trouble now by bringing back so many vets but not using them right. It is time for Days to start a new, original golden age like Lynn Latham has done with Y&R. That is the only way Days is going to survive IMO.

Again. the character is not based on Osama-Boof is given a male character characteristics of him. Nowhere does it say she is making someone into Osama or into someone even like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I got the Post just now. It's a nice spread, actually! Creepy photoshopped pic to make it look like KA is holding Osama, but nice spread! Page 3. NICE! Saying she's basing a character on Osama might do a little more harm than good, but any press is good press, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the way the article is written is causing problems. I would imagine that will creep people out but I also think it will draw attention and people in to watch. I mean come on PAGE 3 OF THE POST!!! Some may be offended by this but, again, Days is not making someone into Osama or into a terrorist or anything. They are just given someone evil characterisitics that [!@#$%^&*] happened to witness herself. She is writing form personal experience and that is why she is a acclaimed novelist. She is just given someone evil characteristics-that is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing to keep in mind about soap opera is that as long as *some* aspect of the show is real and believable, then viewers can follow you anywhere. What I mean is that either A. if the characters are realistically written, portrayed, and reactive, then they can become involved in a world of typically unbelieveable situations and it all becomes believable or B. the situations themselves must be realistic and believeable while the characters actions etc. can be unbelieveable and over the top. When you have both characters and situations that are unbelieveable and unrealistic, that's when you have problems. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Look, I'd be happy about this news if Brad Bell were willing to relenquish the Head-Writer title to her. But I know he will use her for breakdowns and dialogues until she gets sick of running around in circles with these characters. Then, she will be screwed out of not only ABC, but the DAYS dream team.

Hopefully, someone knowlegable in the industry will tell her that B&B will misuse and abuse her services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At the time that Don & Marlena were broken up, Days fans were more accepting. All about this time Days was plagued with big couple breakups. All within a few short years we watched Don & Marlena breakup, Chris & Mary (one of Days next favorite couples at the time), David & Trish divorced, Lee Dumonde had split up Doug & Julie. Ratings were already on a downslide but was hurt even more by the big cast purge that took place at this time too. The couples breaking up did not help.

Also remember that it was quite a while before they moved either Don or Marlena into the next big romance. Don had a brief fling with Liz Courtney, but her ex-husband Tony returned to let them know they were still married. Liz then fell for Neil Curtis. Don also had the affair with Gwen Davies but it was just sex. And of course Marlena got raped by Kellum Chandler.

Then of course Maggie entered the picture for Don, and then Roman for Marlena.

As to the other couples, David moved on with first Kayla then Renee Dumonde, and then left town to never be seen again.

Chris moved on to a whole series of women: Kayla, Savannah Wilder, Ivy, etc. etc. etc.

Mary's portrayer was replaced and turned into a classic villianess after she learned Alex Marshall had only married her for her money. She was killed by the Salem Strangler.

And the Lee Dumonde story was really Doug and Julie's last hurrah on the show. They have been mostly side thoughts ever since then.

Back in that day Days had it's big couples, but when they split up or moved on Days fans accepted it. When Days created their supercouples and destined to be together couples in the late 80's and so on, they created the fan bases. And it has been a different story ever since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah Steve you are right and people were even like that in the 90's Only towards the end of the 90's did things start getting a little too much in regards to fanbases. I mean in the 90's you didn't combo names like Bope, Broe, etc. You didn't have people as rabid as they are now. It is both a good thing and a bad. I understand Days is driven by these fanbases but they can't control the show and writing. That is why Days got to where it got. People need to be a little more accepting and willing to give things a chance. I just know the minute Hogan breaks up anyone it will be armageddon and his head will be called for regardless of how good the writing is. I just hope Sheffer stays the course and that Corday stays back and doesn't force rewrites or storyline drops. That is how Days has become watered down over the years.

Days just needs to make sure it doesn't have a massive amounts of triangles and couple breakups like it did under JER. They can do these things but in moderation. Too much of one thing is where the show loses it's fans. Right now Days is on the right track. They tied up John/Marlena/Alex, Patch/Kayla have a story that isn't a triangle and is about them, Jack/Jen/Frankie has turned into a classic soap story and is the proper way to do a triangle IMO as both men are rootable (except to J&J fans), the triangle with Abe/Lexie/Tek appears over as I don't think Lexie will want Tek now and the actor is recurring, and then we have the two quads with Lucas/Sami/Carrie/Austin and Belle/Shawn/Mimi/Philip which will be ending soon as Sami is gradually moving into story with EJ and Brandt is leaving and maybe Cook so that quad should be ending too. Like I said, Days is getting fans back and if it writes good character driven stories and has at least one attention grabbing story (like the one suggested by this interview) to get casual soap fans and some fans new to Days to tune in then Days will surge big time. You need to attract new viewers too and you won't do that by only appeasing the fanbases. It is ok to make them happy but it can't be the only thought on Days' mind when writing stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy