Y&R: May 2025 Spoilers
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Recent Posts
-
I watched every Daytime Emmy broadcast from 1985-2011 and 2020 onward and the best years were 1985-1999. -
-
By Paul Raven · Posted
I'm that person and I own it. I just find that look so performative. She comes across as playing dress ups. Will anyone back me up? ....anyone?? -
By Paul Raven · Posted
I didn't even bother. And to trot out Lauren and Michael who are hardly on and don't have stories... It must be a money saving situation. -
I recall a scene between Phillip and Chelsea that was played with Bolger--I think it was the characters' first major conversation--but soon after that Grant returned. Chelsea working in PR at Spaulding made little sense. At least Blake was supposed to be qualified. Never understood why Alan was willing to give Chelsea that job. He seemed to really like Chelsea as Phillip's girlfriend, too, which made less sense, as she was even lower on the social scale than Beth. Wait... Just thought of something. Took her storyline? Was CHELSEA originally supposed to be Alan's spy to help him get Spaulding back? Were they going to become lovers? Is THAT what Maureen meant about her being "wild?" Yikes. -
The ball had a certain and-now-for-something-different charm back in the day, but yeah, it's just too polished, too much of an "institution." -
-
By DemetriKane · Posted
Good catch. More Bell parallels. ICAM! With both statements. Same. It doesn't seem like they even enjoy writing for her. They may need to change her career to move her around. I hope it's only for flashback scenes. Not every character needs a family member, especially the villains. That's how I felt, too. It ruined the coming out moment for me. I still liked the moment, but it was more like a plot device instead a more natural time. -
My god Kristina was in full delusion today. I know she was never the best character but I don’t remember ever hating the character the way I do now and have since the baby nonsense. -
.thumb.jpg.ce9e5b41e408ffdc4f147a5719363824.jpg)
To me that's always what they have been. I figured that was part of the charm to people who enjoy them. They could have just had the legendary Rosalind Cash onstage but instead they have Lucky and Luke (and Justus) in the background to give us some heartwarming comedy as the Pips. I think the Nurses' Ball should just have been left to those first few years, to be honest (any time before we got year after year of Ned "rocking out" and the year of a sex tape being played), but I do know many people love them. My main issue is they often just seem a little too glossy since coming back thanks to the HD format. I was watching the Spinelli performance on Youtube and it is clearly meant to be charming, silly fun, which it is, but it's more suited to the cheap seats era of the Ball where you had someone literally hanging from the rafters, not today's slickness.
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.