Jump to content

GH: February 2025 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

The WSB is observing Joss. They want her to solve the murder case. If she brings down Cyrus herself, then they will recruit her into the WSB.

Carly will demand that Jason marry Sasha. Jason will do it because he is her robot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carly will not do so. You don't understand the relationship between Carly & Jason. He is not only not her robot, he is not anyone's. Carly & Jason mutually respect each other. She asks him to do things. He asks her to do things. Neither one of them is superior to the other. They are equals. Steve has said that it's not that Jason has to do things for Carly but that he gets to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, I would take any story that lets Sasha make her own decisions about her body and her baby.  

The whole Sasha needs a man to support her through this trying time is just ridiculous.  Sasha has a job, a home, a large group of friends and family-women have been having with a lot less for years.  Plus, even if she didn't she's still carrying a Q heir.  She'll be fine.

Considering all of Sasha's past trauma I am rooting for her to have this baby and not go through another crisis though.

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And this is where I would need Liz, as a single mom who has raised three sons pretty much on her own, to step in, provide friendship and comfort to young Sasha and defend her against those who insist a baby needs both parents or a woman needs a man to support her in raising her child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

Yeah it's 2025, not 1955.
But the current U.S. government wants to bring us to 1825
(Not trying to derail the GH thread, as there's an entire Politics thread at SON for that.)

To stay on topic, I'm just saying that I'm curious how ABC/Disney will respond to the current political climate.  I hope they won't derail progressive storylines on GH or primetime, but who knows.

I just want Sasha to make her own decisions.  As Khan pointed out, they might not even say the *bortion word on the show. 

And I agree with CarolineG and others upthread:  Seeing as how Sasha suffered so much in so many storylines, and already lost one child, if she chooses to keep this child, I hope it goes well.  And yeah she CAN raise the child herself.  She's a grown woman!

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would like a Liz and Sasha friendship.  I could understand if Sasha felt overwhelmed or scared about this baby, but she hasn't expressed those thoughts at all.  My baby.  My choice.  The father won't be involved should be enough for everyone in town.  And honestly, if Jason was the father Sasha would have plenty of reason not to name him due to pretty much everything that's happened to Jason since 1996.  Also a solid reason not to name Michael as the father as well.  The guy that just got burned by a bomb that was intended to kill his mob boss father.

I am over Sasha's torture too.  Yet she continues to be humiliated and treated badly to this day for no reason.  I don't think she needs more sympathy from the audience at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH should be doing an abortion rights story, as I have said many times before. Not necessarily with Sasha's baby but with some unexpected pregnancy, any pregnancy. It would be topical for the times and very appropriate for the show.

But even before the last election, I can't remember the last time GH said the word 'abortion' onscreen or ever dared allow a character to consider pursuing it. Which is pathetic of Frank and co.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree.  And that's exactly what she should tell Sonny and Carly, too: that she doesn't want them (or Jason) to have any part in how she raises her baby, as Michael is Exhibit A for what happens when you let your child be raised by [!@#$%^&*] sociopaths.

TBH, I wouldn't trust this regime to tell an abortion rights story since it's clear they don't even understand how babies are made (hi, Gio, Sasha and Cody!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I'm not so much a Liz fan as I am a fan of the dynamics that have resulted from her raising three, young men single-handedly.  I feel like single mother/head nurse Liz and her boys should be a major focus on this show, because it's REAL, and it's something that a lot of real women deal with everyday.  Something to remember since TIIC have forgotten that these shows are produced primarily FOR women!

Moreover, I feel like if Liz SHOULD be pursuing a new romance, it shouldn't be with any of her baby daddies but with someone who isn't related to any of her sons, as that's a situation that could yield interesting conflicts as well.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay, I continue to maintain that what is so good about this particular reveal followed by umbrella storyline is that you can see & understand many different points of view where there is not one bad guy or one 100% right person.  About your stated opinion, that Lois & Gloria did the right thing, you know that this was technically an illegal adoption? For it to have been legal the father, if known, would have to have been informed & have signed off on terminating his own paternal rights. And, of course, it is clear how many people they lied to.  Personally I feel like Lois is going to take the biggest "public" blame with Lulu a close second in the blame category. I am looking forward to a tongue lashing I hope Brook Lynn gives to Gloria. I continue to be more than annoyed with Dante. First his attitude toward Gio with regards to Rocco & a drinking game & its results. Second his attitude toward Lulu. Meanwhile enjoying the show every day!
    • Lois and Gloria did the right thing I feel knowing it was Camila that raised Gio has BL feeling some jealousy No one is saying that Camila was a bad mother to Gio I believe it will be Gio saying that Camila was great to him, thanking Lois and Gloria to get BL to see truth
    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates. We've known her long enough to by that this would be consistent with her past characterizatioin
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy