Jump to content

ARTICLE: Citing Decision to Rehire Steve Burton, Former ‘General Hospital’ Star Ingo Rademacher Submits New Evidence in Appeal to Lawsuit Against ABC - REPORT


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Webmaster
Steve Burton, Jason Morgan, Ingo Rademacher, Jasper "Jax" Jacks, General Hospital, GH, #GH

Former “General Hospital” star Ingo Rademacher  (ex-Jasper “Jax” Jacks) is reportedly seeking to have his since dismissed wrongful termination lawsuit against ABC reopened, citing the network’s decision to rehire Steve Burton (Jason Morgan) despite both actors previously being let go in 2021 due to their non-compliance over the since rescinded vaccine mandate.

In June 2023, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Stephen Goorvitch, ruled on Rademacher’s lawsuit, siding with ABC wherein he indicated that Rademacher’s opposition [to getting vaccinated] was “based on health reasons rather than his religious leanings.”

During the summer of 2021, just before Disney (parent of ABC) mandated that all employees be vaccinated or else face termination, Rademacher had been vocal on social media about his stance against the COVID-19 vaccine in particular while clarifying he was not against vaccines themselves. 

In an August 2021 post, Rademacher said, “If you want to get the vaccine because you have a fear of dying from this virus, talk to your doctor and decide. This is about freedom to choose what’s best for you. A huge percentage of our population have already recovered from COVID and have natural immunity, why does that not count? Please let that sink in. Taking the vaccine does not stop you from getting COVID, spreading it, or dying from it. Now would be a good time to be honest and start following the science.”

Since the June 2023 decision, Rademacher has filed an appeal with the court, asking for a review of the case as he believes that new evidence will support his claims, specifically that he lost his job due to religious discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination and violation of his right to privacy. ABC continues to deny any wrongdoing.

According to court documents obtained by InTouch Weekly, Rademacher has filed a new motion with the court, asking for ABC to fix a paperwork issue that is necessary for him to continue with his appeal. Additionally, he’s asking the court to reopen summary judgment proceedings, citing new evidence that “provides compelling support for his political discrimination claim: namely, evidence that ABC rehired Steve Burton, the other ‘General Hospital’ actor it let go supposedly because of its mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy.”

Lawyers for Rademacher state, “ABC’s rehiring of Mr. Burton, which occurred while this case was on appeal confirms that ABC got rid of Ingo because it did not like his political views. It confirms that ABC did not merely lay Ingo off, with the intent of bringing him back later, as it did with [Steve]. It re-cast his role. It replaced him, or is in the process of replacing him, with another actor.”

http://www.soapoperanetwork.com/media/2024/09/General-Hospital-Burton-Wilson-1024x640.jpg
Steve Burton, Sawandi Wilson
Christine Bartolucci/Disney

Additional evidence cited by Rademacher includes alleged documents produced during the discovery period wherein ABC allegedly had plans to terminate his contract as early as the summer of 2021, around the time the actor began amplifying his stance on the COVID-19 vaccine and mandates. Further, text messages from producers calling the actor an “ignorant racist” and “nut” were submitted.

“These text messages related to social media posts that Ingo made during the key period in this case, when the ‘General Hospital’ writers supposedly ran out of ideas for his character,” said Rademacher’s lawyers in their filing. “

As for Burton, Rademacher’s appeal claims ABC rehired the actor despite his refusal to get the COVID-19 shot, noting, “But unlike Ingo, ABC did not have any political animus toward [Steve]. It did not talk about ‘recasting’ his character during 2021.”

Claiming to have compelling evidence, Rademacher’s lawyers point out that “ABC’s counsel argued that the politically motivated text messages ‘General Hospital’ producers sent to each other were irrelevant because, as with [Steve], ABC said it let Ingo go due to the COVID-19 vaccine policy. If so, then ABC should also have re-hired Ingo by now. It has not done that, and it won’t do that, because ABC had already decided to get rid of Ingo, to ‘recast’; his character, because of his political beliefs. ABC opposed Ingo’s ex parte application. The network argued Steve’s rehiring was ‘is completely irrelevant and raises no triable issue of fact in this case.”

InTouch Weekly notes that the court had denied Rademacher’s request to reopen discovery at a recent hearing. Meanwhile, his appeal is ongoing.

Rademacher first joined the cast of “General Hospital” as Jasper “Jax” Jacks in 1996, originating the role of a rich Australian businessman who found himself enamored with Brenda Barrett (Vanessa Marcil). The character continued to appear off and on until November 2021, when Rademacher made his final appearance on the daytime soap opera.



Note: The post Citing Decision to Rehire Steve Burton, Former ‘General Hospital’ Star Ingo Rademacher Submits New Evidence in Appeal to Lawsuit Against ABC appeared first on the Soap Opera Network website.

Read More

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

They re-hired Steve Burton because he was smart: he kept his mouth shut, didn't bad-mouth his former employer and moved on accordingly. I don't necessarily agree with the re-hiring, but he [publicly] played the game right. Rademacher, on the other hand, displayed his disgusting behaviour, and continues to do so. It's hilarious they state they replaced him with another actor when that is not the case at all. Hilarious to me.

He does realize he won't be re-hired, right? Like, this won't make ABC re-hire him, right? He basically sold-off his career. I mean, he should've been fired after he outed himself for being a terrorist (by supporting the January 6th terroristic attack on the Capital), and for his beyond disgusting behaviour on social media. Roseanne Barr got fired for her comments, so Rademacher should have been, as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Or, if ABC does feel pressured to rehire him, the network can just give him the bare minimum in terms of contract guarantees and make Jax a talk to.

Ingo wouldn't be able to say squat, because technically, he would be employed. He has no say in how such employment would be carried out.

To think I once liked Jax and longed for Jax/Alexis. Should have rooted for psycho Jerry/Alexis all along. My apologies, Sebastian Roché!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am sure the lawsuit is [likely] what's keeping them from recasting the role. At this point, anything regarding Jax will just be put into his lawsuit against Disney/ABC.

He won't get hired again. He sued his former employer after acting the way he acted. That's a no-no for any job. He's proven himself a liability for employment. It's like when people call for Victoria Rowell to be hired back at Y&R... she sued CBS, Sony Pictures Television, Bell Dramatic Serial Company and Bell-Phillip Television Production Inc, and then eventually Corday Productions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, this isn't like the Victoria Rowell situation.  She had valid reasons for her lawsuit.  She did eventually work things out with CBS.  She appeared on the Y&R cast tribute episode for Kristoff. She was invited to the Y&R 50th Anniversary party last year and was photographed at the party posing at a red carpet photo area that had CBS and Sony logos. 
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/victoria-rowell-attends-red-carpet-event-for-the-50th-news-photo/1474282794
More pics:
https://www.gettyimages.com/search/2/image?begindate=2023-03-17&enddate=2023-03-17&family=editorial&phrase=victoria%20rowell

The only person/entity she hadn't worked things out with is Steve Kent.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am fully aware of Ms. Rowell's reasons for suing, but it still doesn't mean that's an open door to walk back in and become employed. Being invited to tribute episodes and red carpets (which I am fully aware of her doing and think it was cordially professional of them to do) does not mean it all is well. Her lawsuit may have been dismissed but she still filed it.

Edited by Liberty City
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

If this is the same thing please delete. Sorry if this site isn't reliable, not sure..?

Fired 'General Hospital' Star Ingo Rademacher Claims New Evidence Should Command a Trial Against ABC as He Drags Co-Star Steve Burton Into Legal Drama

 

https://radaronline.com/p/general-hospital-ingo-rademacher-new-evidence-trial-abc-steve-burton/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Another I wonder about if they thought Joe Gallison would have more of an impact after his AW success. Was Agnes still involved with OLTL then?
    • I thought I was the only one. They do nothing for me. I enjoy Dani which seems to be an unpopular opinion here, but Andre to me is as unnecessary as Ashley and Derek. Not only should Vanessa, Nicole's bestie, and her husband have been there but where are Naomi and her man?   
    • I think Vanessa not being there was a matter of choices in who to have there without overloading the interactions. Nicole is going to have to interact with her kids, parents, sister and of course have it out with Ted. Any interaction with Vanessa will have to be after the whole mess goes down.
    • Right--I did think of that, as it was around the same few years.  Accents I guess...
    • It is an insult. To the viewer's intelligence. Everything in this show in the past 4 years has been horribly conceived, produced like a cheap tik-tok video, without any build up or psychological reasoning, and then re-written to level 0 in couple of weeks (where everything is ABSOLUTELY the same as it was before it happened). People get gravely sick and then recover in 5 episodes, because of miracle cures. People get killed and un-killed in the most cartoonish Scooby-Doo scenarios, people get pardoned after killing 2 innocent victims, people become and unbecome CEOs with the snap of a finger. But when you look around in a month or two or three... it's like absolutely nothing has happened. Nobody has grown... or evolved... or changed. We still have Steffy talking to Ridge how Hope and her mother are not worthy. We still have Brooke crying about something that Ridge said. We still have Hope at the same emotional limbo she's been put in ever since Brad decided she needs a re-vamp and made her a ho. EVERYTHING IS THE SAME. Only the Taylors change every few seasons and become increasingly younger. The problem I have with Liam's storyline is the problem I have with every storyline - why should I care if he is dying or sick with cancer when I haven't seen him in 2 years?!! Why go from 0 to a 100 like that. The same way with Sheila... who was backburned for months... before getting fake-killed for ratings. Why would we care about that... when Sheila was a non-entity before that.  Or why should I care for Brooke... when she's been ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of a character for years... to now all of a sudden re-birthed into a lingerie queen and CEO?   Back in the day, we... the viewers of this horrible show... cared and loved to see characters struggle from point A to point B. We wanted to see the build up, the makings of something. Not get a finished result that is undone after a week or two. When Brooke became CEO in 1993... we cheered because it mattered and because she gave HER ALL to get to that point. It was a revenge after years and years of abuse, being slapped around like a homeless dog by Stephanie. She plotted and calculated her every move. But she was also raw and hurt. She was both opportunist and a heroine. She had dept and dimensions. THAT WAS A CHARACTER. That was a human being.   My diagnosis is that at this point Bradley Bell doesn't care. Bold is living off of past history, fans being loyal, the show being 18 minutes of crap that people watch to laugh at. He sees the ratings are still okay and even improving and he DOES NOT GIVE A S-IT. He is even more motivated to continue with the current style of trash. It will only get worse from this day on.  He is way pass the period where he wanted to tell stories or impress the viewers with anything. (Not that he was particularly good about that anyways) I would not even be surprised if he is writing this drivel on complete auto-pilot at this point. Maybe he asks Chat GPT what to write each week. That's how it feels. IF IT'S THE OPPOSITE... and he is trying and that's the BEST HE CAN DO?!!! Then we are really f-cked.  Even Bradley Bell was NOT THAT HORRIBLE guys. But times change and people age... and that's all I'm going to say.   
    • -- Really good episode today, with a lot more happening than I expected. -- SilkPress is great, but I don't see the need to criticize Dani/KM when supporting Leslie. -- That being said, I don't like Dani with Andre. I think they should end that as soon as possible. -- Very lame that Vanessa and Doug weren't there. If they want to impress on us that Vanessa is Nicole's best friend, they need to do better. -- Brandon Claybon continues to improve as Martin, and his relationship with Smitty finally feels real. -- Dr. Carlton is, as others have posted, fine as fck. We need more.
    • As much as I have hyped the looks on this show, those dresses did not impress today. Since the premeire, there's only been one look that I can truly say IMO didn't work (and it honestly wasn't even that bad). It was an outfit Dani wore. These flowly wide leg trousers and it was paired with a loose top with a cowl neck. However, I didn't LOVE a single dress on any of the ladies today. Kat's was great only because it suits the character and her personality - so an A for that. It's a good dress. Dana's was also really nice. Everyone else either just was meh, had something unflattering about the fit, or didn't really fit the vibe.  Also, this isn't BTG's fault. It's just the state of soap operas today, but that event felt empty. Tables of 3

      Please register in order to view this content

      I mean it was nice that they had some extras on there, but it definitely didn't feel like an event when the family was pretty much ever table there.  That was a nice end to the episode and I wonder how this is going to unfold.   
    • I was looking at the AWHP synopses from the period where Quinn had a stalker in 1984 and it refers to pranks and phone calls. Does anybody remember what the pranks were? Or were they just disturbing phone calls?
    • Same. Things were really coming together the last moment of the show. I wish we had more time with it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy