Jump to content

ALL: Bad Moves by Well Regarded Soap Writers/EPs


Planet Soap

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The show's obsession with Todd snuffed out much of the rest of her family. Just another reason that character, along with Viki's sexual abuse story, cast such a pall on OLTL's last years. 

Much as I loved Jessica Tuck's work, Ghost Megan should not have been the most compelling member of the family 20 years after her death.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I agree that the way Jill sometimes spoke to Mamie did have some racial undertones that I can see clearly now as I’m older. She was dismissive of Esther, too, but I always felt she had a visceral hatred for Mamie.

I stumbled across this promo, and when a white woman speaks of a black woman “knowing her place” it does take on a totally different meaning/undertone, whether that was the intention or not. 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also feel that Esther was played as a light comic character much of the time. Mamie wasn’t. So Jill’s treatment of Mamie landed more harshly for me. Plus, VR’s Mamie was more of a threat to Jill on multiple fronts throughout their history and an “equal” from an intellectual standpoint, so the undermining and disrespect hit differently.

Edited by Faulkner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agnes Nixon gave us the inside scoop on why she left SEARCH FOR TOMORROW after the first thirteen weeks, but zip on LOVING.  Between that, Douglas Marland's decision to leave in '85 and have his name removed as co-creator, and Patrick Mulcahey's somewhat cryptic statements about the show on social media, something tells me LOVING was not a very pleasant experience for anyone involved.

I'd agree.  I've long suspected that the network, knowing about Erica and Maria's rivalry, forced the storyline on Lorraine Broderick, who attempted to root Erica's choice to steal Maria's baby in her own issues with daddy Eric.  Unfortunately, I don't think there was any way to justify her doing that; and in fact, I'd argue that it might've damaged Erica and diminished her somewhat in AMC's final years.

I agree.

And I will go to my grave detesting Viki's DID storyline, bravura performances and writing be damned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was two years of brilliant storytelling that the show never really lived up to after. They didn’t know what to do with her immediately after. Her therapy story wasn’t central and was botched. And then they would trot out Nikki Smith like it was the 80’s again.

I think what they did with Jessica later was just beyond disgusting. They really trashed ES’s character with DID as a catch all excuse, and only Slezak’s innate class and intelligence saved Viki when the writing and show let her character down returning to that well.

I love that Robin Strasser constantly brought up that she still beloved and played that Dorian killed Victor, even when the show moved it to Viki. She wasn’t afraid to play a murderer, even when she was not the one playing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. Agnes Nixon developed the bible for All My Children during her time as head writer at Guiding Light, and tried selling the soap to both NBC & CBS, and then again to NBC via Procter & Gamble. Unable to sell it, she tabled it.

She used pieces of her All My Children bible during her stint on Another World, and Rachel Davis was created through her vision of what Erica Kane would be. ABC sought out Nixon to create a soap opera, noticing the success of her Another World stint. That's where One Life to Live came from and, following that success, she brought All My Children to the table.

And Children was the only soap (that I am aware of) where she served as executive producer, so it's clear, to me, that was her ultimate passion project from day one. Doesn't mean she doesn't love the others she was involved with, but it's very clear that Children held the apple of her eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, it is unfortunate that Denise Alexander, who portrayed Susan Martin, left Days of Our Lives in 1973, and her character wasn't mentioned for decades afterward. Susan was a significant figure in the show, especially with the emotional and dramatic arcs surrounding her and her son, Dickie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wish some of that storyline could be posted somewhere (the DAYS archive exists, so it’s available). GL told the same story with Meta on radio years before, and those radio episodes are every bit, if not more, gripping than anything I’ve ever seen on television. 

DAYS seemed to have bad luck with recasts and those characters delved into almost irrelevance after popular actresses left. Flannery and Alexander in particular went on to more notable roles in daytime that seemed to erase their previous success on DAYS from public consciousness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would suggest that this is an excellent topic/thread. I would further suggest that the most egregious thing listed here is the Unabortion, the second most egregious is Todd at OLTL because it wasn't just a rape, it was a gang rape & that leads us to #3 which is the Seduction relabeling of a rape.

The soap journo Lynda Hirsch told me that Pat Falken Smith was herself very uncomfortable with it as a stratagem or rationale for pursuing Romantic Luke & Laura. She went along with it because it was her job to do so. She was very aware of being the single parent of a teen daughter knowing that her income was not just an issue for her alone. What she described was a situation where everyone was in favor of the romance, there was just this very thorny problem of the violent rape at the disco. I think we can all imagine that. We know of Genie's discomfort. We know of Lesley Charleson's objection to it. There very well may have been others. Personally I am satisfied with the way GH chose to deal with it, even though it was many years after the fact. And, I admire the job Michele Val Jean did in writing the story when they revisited it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Wasn't there talk of them bringing back Rita as Gus' mother at one point? Or something?
    • I think they are a part of the same family, although Carla was never really scheming for the same reasons, and once her double life was exposed, she stopped. 
    • Rachel/Ada, Mona/Erica, a mother/daughter at LOVING, these are all examples of the Agnes Nixon "troublesome daughter/put upon mother" trope. Are Carla/Sadie by any chance one of the pairs that make up this trope? Another thing that these 2 shows might have in common. OLTL had a very strong thematic approach to socioeconomic differences between groups of people. Class differences. AW at an earlier point had this too but to be clear it was not as much as OLTL. So that is a similarity but marginal.  Besides that, I see no other comparable things. Paul Rauch was a very different EP at different shows. Oh, I've thought of one more thing. Using actors from the Broadway stage.  But, realistically that was something all of the NY shows had in common. So I don't think it has any uniqueness between AW & OLTL.  
    • When you look at the period between Sweeps, it's as if they tried to maintain a kind of pace where they had a lot of plates spinning in the air & on their fingertips & the whole goal was nothing but to not drop any of those plates. A version of spinning one's wheels. They're not getting anywhere but they give the appearance of a whole lot of activity. I believe it's all about this appearance. At moments they accidentally hit a chord & something resonates but it is a false event.
    • He found the hidden camera and removed the card 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m not speculating anything, but I admit, I’m getting a little worried about James Reynolds. 
    • I feel like this is what they're doing by creating lots of storylines but their biggest weakness for years is the inability to properly pace these stories and give resolution. A good example now would be the Gio story which has been simmering for months with very little movement. I went from not caring to being invested to not caring again because of how long it's taking for the secret to be revealed. One story like that would be fine but it seems like everything moves at this snails pace on GH. They need to do a better job of rotating the stories so everything isn't in that same treading water phase.
    • However, those of us who watch DAYS have been spoiled. On Peacock there are no preemptions. Not for anything & not in or about any show.  I read somewhere that we Baby Boomers in a way invented instant gratification but then we realized that it was not fast enough.
    • The title track from the follow-up album Hot On the Trail is also co-written by Val Jean:  

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy