Jump to content

BTG: History, Behind the Scenes Articles & Photos


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Speak on it! 

 

PS. Will let you know when she pops up again.

Please register in order to view this content

 

But perhaps that's the thing. Soaps have definitely proven they can go on and on. And the world completely still loves them all over. What if the production actually put promotions into it though? Ratings might still decline due to how we as people view shows now (streaming, tv systems, live), but if it is good...people will come and be grabbed hold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Webmaster

Not sure if this has already been brought up elsewhere, but The Hollywood Reporter recently did a story on Paramount cutting costs across films and shows. Not sure if this has anything to do with CBS' thinking when it came to The Gates, or anything else, but here you go:

 

Paramount, Citing Experiment During Strikes, to Cut Costs Per Title For Films, Series

Paramount CEO Bob Bakish and CFO Naveen Chopra explained their plan to reduce content costs on the company's earnings call.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/paramount-content-spending-cuts-2024-1235838881/

 

Please register in order to view this content

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is going to hit Star Trek first at Paramount (and probably already has, given recent moves). But I was expecting that. It's a shame, as that resurgent franchise is responsible for a great deal of what's barely kept Paramount afloat in recent years. I'm just waiting for the service to collapse or merge. Trek will survive one way or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Errol finally had time to read your article. Cannot wait.

Please register in order to view this content

 

As for Paramount, I feel...and I'm sure it has been mostly discussed here as well...that since the strikes was efficient enough to cause a pause, that all companies are getting their lickback through these cancelling of shows and movies to save cost and/or AI. So many good shows are just getting cut right and left right now. Which of course, makes the news of a new soap that must more surprising.

 

However, now that Paramount has merged with my tv system, that just makes me side-eye that must more seeing that header for the article. Also why I cannot get into any Netflix shows knowing that they are more than likely to be cancelled after one season.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Paramount has been looking to merge with another studio and sell off their assets for at least 3 years now. WB was considered a possible merger candidate recently, but they backed down likely because of their own issues with being in debt. Universal is considered another candidate.

If they’re looking to cut a lot of costs, I can’t imagine how much worse the licensing fees for Y&R will be now with the 4 year renewal. The show already operates like it has nothing left. If B&B gets renewed after their current 1 year extension, it will be the same. 

The barometer of success could very well look quite differently for The Gates. First off, they’ve been very direct in saying the core demographic they’re going after is black women, which incidentally is the same core demo Y&R significantly over-indexes viewership with. This is something that’s never often said publicly by networks. This show needs to succeed with this demographic first and foremost it would appear. Of course CBS would like stronger overall viewership, but if it doesn’t resonate with this targeted demo, it won’t last.

I sincerely hope CBS forces some type of behind the scenes change and shakeup at Y&R in time for The Gates to debut. Y&R needs to be as strong as ever to pull some of that audience down to this new show.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And yet, as I mentioned upthread but was far from the first over the years, Y&R has been ambivalent at best about its Black audience and looking to marginalize it/shift away from it for a couple decades. It wanted to be a bad ABC soap, still often does. I don't believe they will ever rehire Victoria Rowell bc of cast issues and probably Sony, but I think she could turn up on The Gates. But will Y&R ever re-embrace its non-white audience?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Paramount+ recently sent me an email offering me a free month after I terminated my subscription, after a promotion that I had received ended. I don’t know if it’s worth it just for a month. For years, power struggles between the Shari Redstone contingent and the Leslie Moonves contingent dominated the corporation and its sense of itself. After one side “won”, it seemed like there wasn’t much of a plan to figure out what came next. Speaking of which, 

This announcement about The Gates had me wondering just how much of an impact Les Moonves might have had in the mindset and programming choices of every show before his ouster. Everyone knows by now that the CBS under Moonves featured many shows that would be regarded as masculine-centric, if not utterly hypermasculine-The NCIS, CSI, 48 Hours type of shows, lots of crime and detective fare. Anything that seemed to cater to women and minorities, seemed to be outside the purview of his worldview. I know he wasn’t responsible for daytime programming directly but never underestimate the power of company culture-what starts at the top will trickle down to the rest of the departments. I don’t know if Y&R will ever step forward, away from its ambivalence toward its nonwhite viewers @Vee. It feels ingrained in the culture and short of sweeping changes with different people with different creative approaches, I don’t see it changing. If “The Gates” takes off and sees success (whatever that looks like these days), it could force Y&R to adopt some changes, but honestly, it seems like a “we’ll just have to wait and see “ type of scenario #1 in a diminished landscape is still #1 and a #1 show may not see a need to “fix” apparatus that, to them, isn’t broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I mean, I think if they really want this show to see success from the onset with the priority demo they’re calling out (black women, I know they just said “African American” but women are the other demographic that still over-index for daytime viewership), they’re really going to have to lean into Y&R’s audience and the (often undeserved) brand equity and loyalty that show has with black viewers. Like it or not, black women have remained loyal to that show and CBS Daytime for some reason. 

They need a resurgent Y&R to get viewers of this demographic interested in sampling something new or something that directly speaks to them. But with those people likely only watching Y&R out of loyalty/habit, are they going to give this new show a chance? That’s why I think they need to reevaluate Y&R’s creative state and authentically start to write better for the black canvas again in advance of this show getting on the air. Josh Griffith is not the right person to do that job…

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Despite the decades of free fall in daytime ratings beginning in 1994 with the OJ Simpson trial, then massive erosion in the mid 2000s, there has been something of a levelling off with daytime ratings to the point that the 5 day a week volume of production has got to look attractive to programming executives.

Plenty of primetime shows the are considered hits, whether they're on network or on cable, have comparable ratings, if not inferior ratings, to all of the daytime soaps. 

I'm not convinced that B&B is in the danger zone with CBS. They want a strong lineup if The Gates has any hope of success and less than 400,000 viewers separates B&B and Y&R

The Talk, on the other hand, is a ratings dud, without any replay or further monetization hopes.

A soap can be sold overseas, shown on multiple platforms etc. This just makes good business sense. I wonder if they'll look to Atlanta for potential production.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The article states that this show will have multidimensional characters and juicy storylines. How juicy, I wonder? Is this going to be some super racy daytime soap? I can see it, especially if they decide to choose Atlanta as the show's setting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You’d think he would’ve learned after the way Sprina took off.  I hope we get a proper Emma/Gio/Trina/Kai quad, as friends, romantic rivals, etc. In the few scenes that the four of them have had together, I felt like there was a natural chemistry between all of them, similar to the way that Cam/Spencer/Trina/Joss was, in the beginning.  And, it would be a lot better than all this stuff with Kai’s surgery. 
    • Hooray we made the exact same critique to Londonscribe!!!!!
    • I don't think they had any idea who he was this time last year. I think they were keeping their options very open. Same with totally dropping the Trina romance that was spoiled for him in the mags once FV clearly took a shine to him. Frank's priorities are bright and blazing in one color. I do think Gio and Emma seem to have worked out given that she is very dry and sarcastic and he is like a hot golden retriever, but I'd still play the field or explore quads with both with very different people - Emma with a scheming young man (of color), Gio with possibly Trina or someone else, or even a boy. Then maybe put them back together, who knows. But of course none that will happen.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He definitely got lost in the shuffle last year. First, they were implying that he was Drew’s son, then he was nothing more than just Violet’s bff

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then they changed him to being Dante and Brook Lynn’s son, which was clunky at first but I’m enjoying the storyline now. 
    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy