Jump to content

B&B: March 2024 Discussion Thread


Taoboi

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I watched the first few scenes and knew there would be ZERO story progression. So, I didn't even bother.

The whole Hope/Thomas/Steffy mess makes zero sense. WHY WHY WHY would Hope want to rush into marriage...with the guy who stole her baby...after she barely just got out of a divorce?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 236
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

It really is.

Why in any universe would Brooke listen to Steffy trash her and her daughter? Why is Steffy consumed with Hope and Thomas in the first place?

Why in any universe would Thomas LEAVE THE COUNTRY because he was turned down for an engagement?

And I can't be the only one who's sick and tired of Hope and her perpetual crying and angst about not being engaged to the man she "loves." She could tell Thomas she wants a 5-year engagement, put the damn ring on her finger, and then STFU. Instead, we get all this fake ass wailing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Casey and the show are full of hot air!

The boring stories just keep going in circles and circles.

The characters have no growth development whatsoever.

Edited by Soapsuds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Brooke to Steffy  - I can't take all the Hope bashing.

LOL.

Said like it was quoted from a fan on an internet board.

The dialogue is so so bad. SO BAD. And Steffy telling Brooke that Hope is TARGETING her brother. It's back to LOL level of cringe.

P.S Something needs to be done to Steffy's hair.  

 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And Steffy sitting there acting like she is a 70 year old (no hate for the older ladies, just not suitable for a girl that age) moralistic matriarch. Honey, you are the same... if not worse than Hope. Only Brooke can top that, sweetheart.

Who are you to sit there and talk to anyone like you possess some moral superiority? When was the last time you slept with your father in law? Did you target him? Or it was not your fault, LIKE IT always isn't. Steffy needs to get a reality check and her husband needs to dump her and find someone else to sit shirtless with. I said it. Not for Hope...  But he needs to leave her. I know this will trigger people, but that's how I feel. 

If Thomas has stomach upset, does Steffy come to sniff around the bathroom and decide if it's bad enough for a check up?  Why does she always have to be in other people's drama? Giving unsolicited opinion.

When it was Stephanie it worked, but it worked because of the character's history and background. When it's Steffy, it just sounds absurd and hypocritical. 

Steffy, look at your own life, just weeks ago you stabbed your husband's psycho mother and she died in your living room. I bet the smell still lingers. Go get some counseling with him. He has nightmares and is seeing things. Go help him, till he starts saying Liberty Biberty again. Go prepare your legal team and defense. Stop sniffing under Hope's dress hoping to find something really stinky. You will find it, I am sure.

Get a life. Get a job. (In Stephanie's voice) Get some empathy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

+ 100000000000! Brooke just sitting there taking it... when she has battled literal queens and kings... is just pathetic. The writing is making Brooke look like an AI robot lately, probably programmed by Ridge and Microsoft. 

And talking about Ridge... All he can say is... Stop it... and Let's not... while smirking in the middle. What a fool.

What a complete waste of actors! These people deserve better scripts. I will not stop saying this. AND. I will repeat myself from days ago... imagine going into full glam, makeup and wardrobe... to stand there and have to utter complete non-sense day after day.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, whether people want to agree or not, Brooke is now the matriarch of the show, and she shouldn’t allow herself to be torn up by Steffy all the time. She really should be her own  “Stephanie” to Steffys “Brooke” and not the other way around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are so right. If they invested more in this direction with Brooke really having a problem with Steffy and trying to destroy her... If they bring the OG Brooke, the jackal that ripped through Forrester... It would be so much fun.

And Steffy and Brooke have waaaay more chemistry when it comes to fights than Steffy and Hope.

But for this to happen Brooke should start being the aggressor, which for some reason Bradley has decided is done in the show. Brooke these days is vanilla and safe. Everything she once wasn't.

Sadly because The aggressor Brooke is when the show is most fun.

I am kinda tired of seeing Brooke be Ridge's puppet who smiles and adores him or her daughter's cheerleader.

Brooke once stole a company and kept it for a decade. She is a conniver of the highest level. Bring this back and make her a brutal enemy with Steffy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy