Jump to content

DAYS: Vet out!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

She was on the 90210 reboot for five years - for daytime, especially for budget fraught DAYS, that's a name. 

And yeah, it looks like she's almost made up to look like Nicole. I'm buying into this conspiracy theory for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

DAYS probably just has a few years at best left anyway. I know that's been said for almost 20 years now, but nothing lasts forever. I hope the show doesn't end but if it does this lawsuit is likely going to be more of a scapegoat than a cause. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To remind: 

Alarr story broke Tues., Jul 25, 2023. Day One.

Alarr fired Fri, Aug. 4, 2023. Day Ten.

 

Blind Item

Fan petition started Jul. 26, 2023 on change.org with 1,471 signatures

Cast petition signed by at least 25

SAG-AFTRA involvement 

 

Alarr's career path:

2005, occasional director

2013 a promotion

2015 promoted to co-EP

also regular director

de facto head writer

My comment: From 2015 till 2023 firing it was on the full EP Ken Corday to be responsible for what was happening with the show & the people at the studio. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She has blonde hair and her hair is up in rollers, that doesn't make her Nicole. People run too quick with random spec and then call it 'rumor.' Would it shock me if they were stupid enough to recast Nicole on the heels of this? Nope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good for her bringing all of this to light and standing up for herself. This kind of rampant abuse and toxic behavior is rampant in the industry. I once used to work in production and saw it and experienced it all the time. It's such a competitive business that people will, sadly, put up with a lot of nonsense and downright abuse that simply would not fly in other industries. There appears to now be at least...some...fighting back that this type of work atmosphere should not be considered "normal."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is... unsettling, and so sad that essentially her career as Days of Our Lives is done because of two abusive men. Fücking disgusting. Corday Productions should be incredibly worried about the sexual harassment claims, and if others are called to testify... this'll end that soap. And I hope she bleeds everyone for all they are worth. And, if she can prove the offer they may have provided was substantially less, due to her whistleblowing then she has a strong claim there, too.

At this point, I'm going to need Peacock / NBCUniversal to step-in and demand the soap be placed in their control ⏤ something NBC should have done years ago. Buy-out Sony Pictures Television, bring in Universal Television, bring in a team of producers and writers capable of handling a streaming soap in 2024 (if it's even worth saving at this point) and make this set as healthy as possible. The set of Days of Our Lives is toxic as fück and, at this point, I fail to see how the promotion of Janet Drucker is going to help in the long-run.

The fact this is picking up mainstream press (Rolling Stone) is a lot. Also, where the fück is SAG-AFTRA in this?! Do they don't care? Because it seems as if they don't. They didn't during the strike when Alarr's disgusting nature was exposed, and they don't care now. Some union, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As caroline and I noted in the DAYS thread, I doubt this is the end for Ari. If Corday can go scorched earth on Missy Reeves' private life in the '90s when suing her and still bring her back, this is potentially peanuts lol. I would not be shocked if they settle and she's back soon, but that's not what I want. Like you and others I want real justice for her and the show overall. I just don't think it's likely; I think she'll get a payout and then come back. And she shouldn't.

And yes, SAG needs to be on this (assuming it is under their purview - not sure if it is given the recent strike exemptions). I'm tired of soap performers being third class citizens.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But didn't they sue Melissa Reeves? I'm not entirely in the known of that situation. Just that there was a supposed affair between her and other actor (the Peter Blake actor). But this is Zucker suing Corday Productions AND Ken Corday, who we know is playing golf all-day long and still associating with the abuser. If Corday and Corday Productions were smart they'd settle with her, and then she should pursue other soaps. I just don't see how she could go back onto the set again knowing Corday is there. I know I wouldn't be able to if I were her.

If they're signed to SAG-AFTRA, even through Netcode, then the guild should be involved and protecting these actors they claim to want the best for. Or is it just about money for them? It baffles me. And yup. Soap performers are third-class citizens in the acting world. Bottom of the barrel (so-to-speak).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sony is their distributor. Ownership? NO. Involvement? YES. 

And, I would remind whomever that during the fan campaign to get Alarr fired, Fran Drescher got personally involved & set up a meet betw Corday & a Sony rep (cause they did the initial investigation) & 2 people from SAG-AFTRA. One or two days after that meet, Alarr was fired. So to assume they do not care is just plain wrong. Someone please quote me on this so Liberty City will see it. THNX. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days sued her for breach of contract a year after she left because she attempted to join B&B as Kristen Forrester while still bound by the terms of her Days contract. 

I’m referring to the poster who thinks NBCUniversal can buy out Sony when Sony doesn’t actually own any piece of Days.

Does Liberty have you on ignore? 

I can’t imagine suing your former employer and then returning to work there.

Edited by Lye-C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • True enough, and Tony and Annabelle suffer the same problem. And the people Quint and Nola had interacted with were gone--Kelly, Morgan, Helena, Mrs Renfield---even Van's been transplanted to the Lewis enclave. Nola's curiosity could've been used somehow, but after Reva's arrival it seems like Long is obsessed with selling that woman to the audience.  As originally written--no, the Chamberlains weren't stockholders anymore. At least not to my understanding. But any story where Quint and Vanessa teamed up, realizing that Alex had played them, and found some loophole to get back in to restore Henry's legacy would've been welcome. As much as I like India--Spaulding gets weird in '85 with Alex, Phillip, India and Warren fighting amongst themselves.
    • Finn with that tight blue shirt too 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hello, Cosmo centerfold

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Same. And looking sooooo good. 
    • Yeah this episode was actually really good. I loved SINN together against Looney
    • I can forgive them not writing a lot for Quint/Nola at Van and Billy's first wedding, given that Lisa was hugely pregnant and the other story going on was Tony's medical crisis. But yeah---Nola and Quint barely even speak to Van for that last year-plus. Not even after little Billy's born (although Nola and Van do have a nice scene, which is one of the few that they're just nice to each other) or the fallout of Van's addiction, and they flippin' leave when Billy's in a coma or right after being in one)  Even Henry goes to story Siberia. They gave them a big, new set and the promise of some Billy/Van/Nola/Quint family squabblin'--and NADA.  How COOL would it have been to see Nola side with Van and put Reva in her place? But no...NOLAROBICS. RME. Reva really needed someone outside of Josh to tell her like it was. Instead, Billy's head cheerleader. And Jon's calling him "uncle Billy", which just about made me gag.
    • 5-12   Well, as much as i've been enjoying the highs of BTG, I guess I should try to play catch up on my other soaps...lol.   I actually liked this episode. But I guess it could be because I felt there was a lot going on. Bill and Liam's talk. Luna attempting them inroads with Finn. Steffy comforting Hope over Liam. Sheila thanking Bill for helping Luna. Even a decent cliffhanger with Steffy walking in on Luna and Finn.   I know I said it before, but I don't care for the Liam storyline, but the acting has been good.   
    • I enjoyed Santa Barbara from the beginning. Mainly because it was so fresh and different than the P&G soaps I was used to watching.  But there is no denying that it did not hit its stride until 1985. The writing, casting and production all finally came together. Unfortunately backstage drama then slowly destroyed the show and for me from 1988 onward it was a completely different show than the one I was a fan of. 
    • Oh, really? That explains why the reveal episodes...the majority of which Zimmerman did the breakdowns for...hit perfectly. Cool! I really loved that. Background music and all.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy