Jump to content

SOD is ending it's weekly print edition


Recommended Posts

  • Members

SOD awards were always voted in by fans anyways to begin with lol besides the editor’s awards which allowed soaps like AW and Loving to win stuff as well lol but I was thinking of the 1997/1998 controversy of SOD discovered a conspiracy of someone at ABC purchasing and stuffing thousands of ballots

Unlike the Daytime Emmys which rotated between the Big Three until 2004, the SOD awards always aired on NBC. Probably a saving grace for NBC Daytime lol.

Edited by soapfan770
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Not just the price but the magazine itself, less than 100 pages and flimsy paper quality.

Keeping it real, SOD hasn't really been relevant for the better part of the last 25 years. I will forever maintain that the internet made the soap press obsolete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My only counterargument is that a lot of the "hot takes" that we read on this very board comes from the influence of the magazine.

Now, were those ideas published more than 25 years ago? That's debatable.

But, I can trace so much of the "insider knowledge" espoused about producers and "expert critiques" of writers directly to opinions from the magazine.  Including, but limited to, the discussion of the riggery of the SOD awards.  I recall stories of ballot stuffing and backstage voting strategy sessions in the magazine itself.  So, that's a direct example of the influence of the magazine on how fans discuss soaps.  Because, it is not an original idea that the awards were rigged, it came from the source.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This past year they did take action about piracy. They either took action on people's Twitter accounts or they sent cease & desist letters saying they were going to begin getting people's Twitter accounts suspended. Fans went nuts! I posted about it being stealing & about copyrights & people were amazed. 

It was something they needed to have done long before then. 

This is sad to me. They were the last one still putting out a print edition. When I lived in Brooklyn from 1998-2005 I was in the Digest offices often & had friends there. They will put out 4 special issues per year & they will probably have even more content on the website. I have great memories. I was at many Digest parties after hours. 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
typos are always with us
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought this was interesting. In 2022, SOD had a weekly circulation of 43,734, compared to Us Weekly which still has a weekly circulation of 2 Million per week.  Obviously, with AARP, print media tends to skew toward an older crowd (I mean, I'm no spring chicken, but even I have never heard of American Mainstreet Magazine).

Please register in order to view this content

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

There was a time between 1997–2002 or so when SOD had well over a million subscribers and was actually in the top 50 most read magazines in circulation for a few years there. Of course that was also a time when the internet was emerging and there was also eleven/ten soaps on the air at the time and there was competition from SPW, SOU, and three editions of SID.

There was a time between 1997–2002 or so when SOD had well over a million subscribers and was actually in the top 50 most read magazines in circulation for a few years there. Of course that was also a time when the internet was emerging and there was also eleven/ten soaps on the air at the time and there was competition from SPW, SOU, and three editions of SID.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, damn.  Who am I going to ask if me and my friend have a steak dinner riding on a bet if whether Eileen Davidson was born a man or not?

Please register in order to view this content

But that makes me sad.  I will miss seeing it hidden at the checkout at the grocery store.   I hoarded so many issues when I was young and got a subscription the minute I was 18 and read it front to back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@kalbir   So you think the soap press stopped being relevant as of 1998. I just think that is way too early for that indictment. 

Now I preferred the Atlanta mag that I think was called Soap Opera Now. It was put out by Michael Kape & Don West & Joanna maybe Koontz & they were the only mag that actually explained & interpreted ratings.

And, I preferred Soap Opera Weekly because Mimi Torchin actually did Lit Crit type of criticism of the soaps.

But that left a lot to be liked in SOD. 

The whole business suffered because they were so in bed with the shows. The whole business suffered because fans were pirates. The whole business suffered because they were slow to get on board with the Internet. 

But I think in general that fans learned how to be fans from the soap press & to a huge degree from SOD. How to think about, how to discuss, etc. 

What is the oldest SOD you have? Here's mine. 

Please register in order to view this content

May 1976, a very young Suzanne Rogers on the cover, Vol. 1, No. 6, 60 cents, 112 pgs. There were 15 soaps covered in their recaps. 

I have the June 1999 where SOD spent the last day at AW out in Brooklyn with the show & every page is about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

SOD Who's Who 2000

Lynn Leahey, Editor

Stephanie Sloane, DAYS Editor

Jodie Reines, Photo Editor (pronounced Ray-nez)

Randee Dawn, AW Editor

Jennifer Lenhart, ATWT Editor

Melissa Scardaville, GL Editor

Elaine G. Flores, AMC Editor

Mara Levinsky, AMC Editor

Carolyn Vozzo

Stella Bednarz

Carolyn Hinsey, opinion

Tom Stacy, Y&R Editor

Devon Owen, B&B Editor

Tracy, Natalie,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The Producers Guild of America (PGA), while not a union, does have rules and regulations regarding membership, conduct, and yes, credits. Assuming she’s a member of course. Being uncredited for what work exactly? Given her years of experience and multiple Emmy wins - why now decide you want to go uncredited for work you’ve done? 
    • That's very sad. What party he represented for and which area he represented? 
    • -- Daisy is a terrible name. If you're not going with a family legacy name, you gotta do better than that. -- When Frank is done with a character, he makes sure that character is painted in the worst possible way and the shade is thrown in the script. Natalia is being treated like a punchline to a bad joke....not that I mind. -- So Cody talked about Britt today. Gee, I wonder what's going on.
    • I remember another Phyllis residence -- I don't think that was a set shown abovethread, but I'm not sure.  Trying to remember some things off the top of my head but I might be wrong about part of it: I'm referring to the condo where Phick first had sex after the Michael/Lauren wedding.  I think they specifically referred to it as a condo?  After Stafford's Phyllis went into a coma, Jack sold it and I think he gave money to HunterKing's Summer when she married Austin? Or he gave Summer the condo?    There was a convoluted side plot about someone needing money and something from this was drawn in a shady way.  Something about it being sold?  And then when GinaT's Phyllis awoke from her coma, she had no condo to come back to.
    • Which union rules? SMH. Jill’s back, uncredited. 
    • Yeah I don’t get why she wouldn’t be credited if she’s back. That seems odd. I hope it’s true though, because the show needs a change. Badddddd.
    • The casino scenes came out of nowhere in comparison to the rest of the week, but at least there was some movement in the storyline. Joey has really made a fool of Vanessa. Chelsea is really embarrassing herself with this doctor. The desperation is so obvious and she clearly gets that from Dani. Hayley was giving Donna Logan vibes because that is how Donna acted when Eric had a heart attack. Stealing potential evidence is not going to reflect well on Kat and might throw the case against Leslie. Tomas had no business in Eva's hotel room even if he did shut down her advances. But I think they still might end up together at some point because the book that Eva gave him is the same one Kat called basic which seemed like foreshadowing.
    • So Sharon decides not to go to France and stay behind to support Mariah, but now with Phyllis gloating about getting an invite I’m sure she’ll change her mind.    Mariah’s secret is that she screwed that old man? I’m so confused about what’s going on here, and Mariah coming out and telling Tessa that she can’t know her secret is supposed to do what exactly? Is that supposed to put Tessa’s mind at ease? Lol…. I’m getting Cameron Kirsten vibes though. Did he do something to her without her consent and things went too far? These writers really can’t come up with something original if their life depended on it 
    • Eve and Thomas have so much in common--they both like reading (print and audio books) and wow they both like reading *fiction*!  (Also I would never pick up a book called Mercy and Goodness yawn

      Please register in order to view this content

      )
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy