Jump to content

HBO Max is becoming "MAX"


Recommended Posts

  • Webmaster

I think Warner Max would have made more sense as well. Someone even made a fantastic logo for that name using the current WB font scheme. I guess they chose not to emphasize the Warner part since they are merged with Discovery, and that brand would be lost with the Warner Max name. I'm warming up to the Max name since they have used "Max Original" on most of the key art for their original shows, so it makes sense. My issue is that Max is a name of a person. At least with Peacock, which is a bird, NBCUniversal could say that the Peacock has been NBC's branding for decades and made sense to use the name with their streamer. Max isn't the same in that regard. Again, it's just a generic shortened version of a name for a girl or a guy, whether it be Maxwell, Maxine, Maximillian, or what have you. Max would even make sense if it were the name of one of the Warner Bros. from back in the day. But to use "Max" as the name for your streamer, to me, is giving up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

It's all of a piece of Discovery being arrogant enough to think their brand is bigger than HBO, AFAIC and to think they can mold it to being all things to all people, like their aspirations for their own content. But they are climbing out of a mountain of debt too and this merger won't last.

These are dark times for the various platforms and providers creatively and financially after a drunken boom period and an oversaturation of content above all. I think ultimately HBO will survive and repair itself in time (along with other platforms), but I think what's been done to it and its library in the meantime is a travesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me, "Max" is too general, and I feel for Cinemax, who've used "Max" in their name for so long. Hahaha. "Warner Max" would've been the right name, focusing on HBO & Discovery-owned programming. And you're right: NBC had it right with "Peacock", because the peacock was also synonymous with NBC's logo dating back to 1956 (ended in 1975 and returned in 1979). Just like the eye has always been synonymous with CBS. It's a missed opportunity, but, like I said, so long as the content is the same (HBO Max to Max), then I am happy, because the film content is top tier, and the quality is amazing.

The fact Discovery+ isn't ending is infuriating to me, because they don't want to lose that customer base. Let them go to Max like HBO Max people need to move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...
  • Webmaster

So it turns out the article referenced by that Twitter/X account wasn't actually about the percentage rate in which people canceled their subscriptions to Max and other streamers but how much the services themselves canceled programming with Max having the highest cancel rate and Apple TV+ having the lowest.

https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/streaming-services-cancellations-study-hbo-max-highest-1235718137/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think people fooled themselves with the notion that anything that was streamed could be streamed forever; it can't.  Streamers, I'm sorry to say, have become a business like any other, concerned only with the bottom line.  That's why, more and more, I'm seeing people on social media urging others to buy and hold onto "physical media" (i.e., DVD's and Blu-rays) whenever they can.

Between all the cancellations and removals, and the merging of platforms and talk of merging, it seems as if our love affair with all things streaming has begun to fade, with many suggesting that the streaming industry is becoming not much different from cable.  Of course, returning to cable and OTA TV is out of the question; we're too far gone for that.  But what happens if or when streaming becomes passe?  What happens to how we receive our entertainment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Members

The acronym "HBO" has become like "AT&T" or "American Express."  No matter how hard you try to erase it from our culture, it never really goes away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't remember that scene! OMG, that is TOO funny!  There were three unseen Reardon siblings at this point. I suppose they wanted this one to be of an age to belong to the current young adult crowd, so that's why they retconned their birth order, but hell, at least bring in someone interesting. Maureen was already the goody-goody, they didn't need another one.
    • According to Errol, she wrote for Ambitions and has already joined the writing team of BTG.
    • Blake was a character that was introd right before or during the strike. When Long came back she asked who Blake was talking to on the phone and the producers were like "We don't know!" It was Curlee who pushed to make that character Chrissy...when they were in talks with Zaz to replace Pilon as Alan, (dummies) . I like the idea of another Reardon but yea, Chelsea? I grew to like her but she just seemed to be a kid that Bea fostered instead of a Reardon. Remember when they had a big scene of the Ed and Maureen talking about the "wildest" Reardon coming home, and Rick says, "Nola's coming back" and Maureen says, "Oh no, Chelsea's MUCH wilder then even Nola!" Okay..riiggghhht. I know they mentioned her "jumping in a fountain in Rome," and since they also had boring Tangie do that, this was apparently the wildest thing the writers could dream up (or they watched the "the Birds" too many times.)
    • Skyy Sandifer was listed as today's scriptwriter for Days.
    • Someone mentioned a while back that Katelyn MacMullen should be chosen as a recast for Ashley and I think that's a great idea. I'm still hoping that BTG poaches her from General Hospital and have her play Ashley. Also the writing for Ashley could use some improvement because right now Ashley is coming across as extremely emotionally unstable and neurotic. I can't help but wonder if that's supposed to be intentional. 
    • Derek is a firefighter, yet we haven't met any of his co-workers or friends, and there is no set location for his job. Derek is so isolated from everyone else. @NothinButAttitude I wonder the same thing about the crooked cop story. Where did it go?
    • The least of the problems this soap has. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yes.  Are any of them famous?  I suppose Drew and Laura would warrant an interview because they are politicians but he's hosting.  Lucy and some of the acts also make sense to interview, but it's not like a world-famous supermodel is there.  She wasn't invited lol.  Why would anyone care about Cody and Molly?  I also wonder where this airs.  Years ago, when Britt and Liesel? Brad? were watching it on tv it looked like a Public Access channel like those local stations everyone gets. Going back to the MS Nina days she has hosted on and off.  I don't get it, but it's always been a thing.  Drew hosting perplexes me.  I think it loosely has something to do with Aurora, but he's not involved in that anymore, right? I think the whole red carpet stuff looks cheap and ugly.  I liked when they just showed a montage of the couples and people arriving during the first scenes of the Nurse's Ball. Something like this:

      Please register in order to view this content

      I apologize for the absolutely awful quality, but Alan singing and people coming in looks much better.
    • I'm really glad that Michael saw that ridiculous kiss. 
    • Thanks for the link and the articles @slick jones
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy