Jump to content

Which soap won't survive by 2025?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

I imagine it does fine. AMC and OLTL were #1/#2 when they dropped each week/day so I imagine soaps do a lot better on streaming then gets talked about. DAYS was/is #1 for NBC online. Not sure where it falls on Peacock. Again, I still imagine it does fine. 

 

Not sure on Y&R/B&B streaming. They haven't really had an outlet except All Access which is becoming Paramount+ so we will see I guess.

Edited by KMan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since 2013 and the show only getting one year pick ups, March 8 is the latest date that DAYS has announced renewals. Ken Corday has said the current contract has them filming until April 26, so if we don't have an announcement for a renewal this week, we could very well see the end of DAYS sooner than later. At the very least, it could mean some sort of change is being negotiated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, I see all four still on the air in 2025, if only because the networks STILL won't have anything to replace them.  If even one show goes, it'll be because that network has given up the ghost and ceded the airtime back to the affiliates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

ITA with the "auto pilot" remark.  The remaining 4 had a bump around 2012-2014 with the loss of four long-time shows, but now it's a slow decline yet still steady enough to sustain for some years ahead. None of the four remaining shows will try anything innovative and groundbreaking at this point. It's just wash, rinse, repeat. Keep it simple; keep it budget-friendly. Keep it alive; keep everyone employed. 

 

Did ANY of us think in 2011 that both Days of Our Lives and General Hospital would be around in 2021?  We even thought Y&R and B&B would be gone by 2020. Meanwhile, you had the AMC & OLTL Hulu reboots fizzle out just a couple years before Hulu, Netflix, streaming went BOOM.  It's hard to predict in this day and age how television will evolve, where people are cutting cable cords, picking 'n choosing which streaming services they want, etc. 

 

Edited by Gray Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The shrinking of sets that I am reading about in show threads feels a bit unsettling to me because it takes me back to the last years if some cancelled soaps.

When soap sets become unsightly and the scripts are bad, it just doesn't seem to portend a bright future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just love that word "unsightly". LOL.  One of my friends and I in college and I would have a bit - when something was bad, she would say "It's just GHASTLY!"  and I would reply "OHHH it's UNSIGHTLAYYYYYY!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Someone in Y&R thread mentioned the word to describe their current sets, which inspired this post, lol. Since I almost never watch the show (or any daytime dramas) anymore, I felt weird about posting this thought in there.

Also, the word "Ghastly", always tickles me, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days sets must be minute if Y&R appears to have space!

Covid has obviously affected budget (cost of regular cleaning etc) and production (number of extras, sets etc) so Y&R eg is looking threadbare compared to only a few years ago.

So long as they produce some kind of profit they will continue for now.

If to do so, the budget keeps getting cut it will surely reach the point that they cannot be feasible any more.

Also, the shows need to stop writing like its 1985. Get rid of the big corporations( with no offices and employees) mega wealthy citizens (who live in one room homes or tiny hotel'suites') and fancy restaurants (with no patrons) and pivot to a more realistic narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Agreed and I was just thinking of that the other day. Yes, GL's switch from the hustle bustle of Springfield (with skyscrapers and various haves-and-have-not neighborhoods) to the vast open fields of Peapack were a bit harsh, but surely these 4 remaining shows (well, minus LA-based B&B) could slowly pare down the show's mega corporations and mansions, as their budgets no longer adequately represent those lifestyles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think they had any idea who he was this time last year. I think they were keeping their options very open. Same with totally dropping the Trina romance that was spoiled for him in the mags once FV clearly took a shine to him. Frank's priorities are bright and blazing in one color. I do think Gio and Emma seem to have worked out given that she is very dry and sarcastic and he is like a hot golden retriever, but I'd still play the field or explore quads with both with very different people - Emma with a scheming young man (of color), Gio with possibly Trina or someone else, or even a boy. Then maybe put them back together, who knows. But of course none that will happen.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He definitely got lost in the shuffle last year. First, they were implying that he was Drew’s son, then he was nothing more than just Violet’s bff

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then they changed him to being Dante and Brook Lynn’s son, which was clunky at first but I’m enjoying the storyline now. 
    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
    • Thanks. I know Marland did that type of thing sometimes but it's less likely with these characters. I don't even remember Alex ever mentioning him.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy