Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

  • Member

Edit

12 hours ago, ranger1rg said:


That was one of THE worst performances I’ve seen on a soap in years. Just stultifyingly bad. DAYS cuts scenes all the time, but they keep this [!@#$%^&*]? 
 

As far as Freddie giving up acting, I’d say he never STARTED acting. He’s awful.

Post of the year!😂

giphy.gif

 

 

 

The editing for Days is atrocious!!

Edited by Soapsuds

  • Replies 336
  • Views 55.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Member
17 minutes ago, Soapsuds said:

The editing for Days is atrocious!!

 

DAYS must have hired the anti-social college students who made chopped salad of GL's Peapack episodes.

  • Member

Billy Flynn is really going for it with the drunk acting.


We’re even getting some Halle Berry/Monster’s Ball “Make me feel good” sh!t.

  • Member
20 minutes ago, Soapsuds said:

Edit

Post of the year!😂

giphy.gif

 

 

 

The editing for Days is atrocious!!

 

Freddie just wasn't as invested anymore. I don't think he's the strongest actor ever but RSW makes him look like a master thespian in comparison LOL

 

Freddie checked out when he exited the first time and never really checked back in. He couldn't play greasy angry Sonny well. That was so painful to watch. 

 

To me, he was basically playing himself these last few years. I don't quite get the hate he gets but to each their own.

 

And it's bizarre at what they cut out yet other things they leave in SHOULD have been cut. Fran is [!@#$%^&*].

4 minutes ago, Khan said:

 

DAYS must have hired the anti-social college students who made chopped salad of GL's Peapack episodes.

 

Even they could do a better job than what we end up with on the soaps LOL. They're all so badly cut together and produced.

  • Member
3 minutes ago, Khan said:

 

DAYS must have hired the anti-social college students who made chopped salad of GL's Peapack episodes.

Did no one notice how horribly edited the episode with Will's return was? 

  • Member

I guess that's the price you have to pay for taping 56 episodes per week.  Nevertheless, it just annoys me how...careless the whole production has become at DAYS.  The "old Hollywood" studio system of the 1930's and '40's had a similar, just-crank-'em-out approach to filmmaking; yet, even their shoddiest B-movies displayed more care and attention to detail than do most soaps nowadays.  Just because they don't have the money or even time that they used to, that's no excuse to be so haphazard in putting together even the simplest episodes.

 

10 minutes ago, KMan101 said:

Even they could do a better job than what we end up with on the soaps LOL. They're all so badly cut together and produced.

 

They stay trying to give us '80's soap opera on a '50's soap opera budget.  It's maddening.

Edited by Khan

  • Member
13 minutes ago, Khan said:

I guess that's the price you have to pay for taping 56 episodes per week.  Nevertheless, it just annoys me how...careless the whole production has become at DAYS.  The "old Hollywood" studio system of the 1930's and '40's had a similar, just-crank-'em-out approach to filmmaking; yet, even their shoddiest B-movies displayed more care and attention to detail than do most soaps nowadays.  Just because they don't have the money or even time that they used to, that's no excuse to be so haphazard in putting together even the simplest episodes.

 

 

They stay trying to give us '80's soap opera on a '50's soap opera budget.  It's maddening.

 

Right? I miss the EFFORT made to produce a great show. We notice these things. And to be frank, if the writing were actually compelling we might not. You summed it up pretty perfectly. (EDIT: And when the soaps DO manage to produce a solid episode somehow, we notice and realize they COULD actually do it but they don't)

Edited by KMan101

  • Member
1 hour ago, KMan101 said:

And to be frank, if the writing were actually compelling we might not. 

 

Agree!  Things like the inscrutable episode guarantees would not matter as much if what we saw everyday on-screen with whoever was available for that episode or that week was generally compelling.  I think it was Jean Passanante who called daytime a "first draft medium," and right there is part of the problem.  Most writers in her position take a similar, slipshod, reckless approach to the work, because, "hey, soaps come at you fast!".

 

I swear, if Ron Carlivati spent more than ten minutes plotting any one story, he'd actually write something halfway watchable (maybe!).  But, you can tell he's coming up with much of his crap right there during the story conferences because he's too damn lazy to sit down and write a [!@#$%^&*] long-term story projection -- and he (and other HW's) can blame it on network interference all they want, but Irna, Agnes and Bill faced similar levels of interference in their day (and sometimes more!) and still managed to churn out compelling drama.

Edited by Khan

  • Member

I realize someone cheating on a partner over a misunderstanding (or a manipulation, in this case) is a soap story as old as the genre, but I’ve rarely felt more irritated by it than I do now. 

  • Member
2 minutes ago, Faulkner said:

I realize someone cheating on a partner over a misunderstanding (or a manipulation, in this case) is a soap story as old as the genre, but I’ve rarely felt more irritated by it than I do now. 

It's garbage. Yesterday's show was terrible! 

  • Member
5 minutes ago, Soapsuds said:

It's garbage. Yesterday's show was terrible! 

 

Complete trash.

 

And you know it's going to get worse. I bet Gwen gets 'pregnant' but it's really Rolf's bizarre Stefano essence baby. Watch. Way to kill one of the more interesting characters introduced. Emily O'Brien is sooooo good and Gwen was fun at first but I'm over it. We still don't even know Gwen's real motivations. That's total bad writing. Why? Because there are none. Ron saw a lifetime movie with a similar 'Nanny Gwen' and I bet I know where he got his idea. It's all so thrown together and forced. 

 

Meanwhile, Charlie was introduced in OCTOBER and by DECEMBER is a psycho. But at least we kind of understand his crazy motivations to kidnap Ava. And you know Ron will pull the mental illness card because it's become a throwaway line to justify characters doing bizarre things. 

Edited by KMan101

  • Member
5 minutes ago, Soapsuds said:

It's garbage. Yesterday's show was terrible! 

Everyone is so fücking stupid in this story. 

  • Member
28 minutes ago, Faulkner said:

I realize someone cheating on a partner over a misunderstanding (or a manipulation, in this case) is a soap story as old as the genre, but I’ve rarely felt more irritated by it than I do now. 

 

Usually, that's because there's little, if any, build-up to the misunderstanding or manipulation that precipitates the infidelity.  It USED to be that writers would take the time to reveal the flaws inherent in the relationship, so that when one would cheat on the other, it would be believable and inevitable.  But, now...?  A couple could be blissfully happy on a Monday, have a ridiculous misunderstanding on a Tuesday, cheat on each other on a Wednesday, and find out they're both having out-of-wedlock kids on a Thursday.  Not even "Three's Company" was that trifling in its' plotting.

Edited by Khan

  • Member
3 minutes ago, Faulkner said:

Everyone is so fücking stupid in this story. 

 

And you notice how quickly they dumb down Abby when Marci is in the role? Abby is smart when it benefits the writing. I'm just so over it all honestly.

Just now, Khan said:

 

Usually, that's because there's little, if any, build-up to the misunderstanding or manipulation that precipitates the infidelity.  It USED to be that writers would take the time to reveal the flaws inherent in the relationship, so that when one would cheat on the other, it would be believable and inevitable.  But, now...?  A couple could be blissful happy on a Monday, have a ridiculous misunderstanding on a Tuesday, cheat on each other on a Wednesday, and find out they're both having out-of-wedlock kids on a Thursday.  Not even "Three's Company" was that trifling in its' plotting.

 

Yet another "nailed it"

  • Author

Chad's rant on Abby's mental illness was truly disgusting.  That crappy NYE Party just showcases. How bad the production values are. Anna was the only entertaining thing about this episode. After Sonny's Zoom call. Will went and had more orgies. With tasty suds.

Edited by victoria foxton

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.