Jump to content

So in Today's Soap Climate...Could You?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I've been sitting here binging and formatting my novel and I wondered.

 

I know there are a lot of writings on this site. And a lot of you have excellent ideas, ways of plotting, and knowledge of soaps' past. 

 

So given how soaps are run now with producers with agenda, networks with interference, and actors with some egos...if you could write for any of the current soaps...would you? If so, why?

 

Bonus points if you want to spill some of your story ideas tea if you were hired.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I don’t think so.  I think any attempt to dot all the i’s and cross all the t’s, to build a long term storyline and play all the beats are done on these soaps.
 

Agenda storytelling has become the only way these shows get done anymore, at least since the early 2000’s.  The egos of network people and EP’s have replaced doing what is right for the show.  It’s pretty clear as they started killing off legacy characters and decimating families they themselves see no future in the product.

 

The writer has to have enough power to execute their vision.  Like a show runner.

 

If you asked me this 10 years ago though, I would have said HELL YES!!

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have no writer training whatsoever besides the extremely smutty Big Time Rush fan fiction I wrote while in college, so I'm not sure if my opinion is even valid, but my answer is not just "no" but "hellllll no." I love creating characters and developing stories in my head, but I get way too attached to my vision of how things would play out to consider working in an industry that can take your vision and completely flip it around to suit their needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seems like an utterly thankless job too, as you’re responsible for so much content. Sure, you’re paid pretty well, but you’re giving up a lot for it. There are just too many platforms available for writers these days that are less prescriptive and restrictive. Even many writers from well-regarded cable series have their horror stories of interference and just multiply that by a thousand on daytime. And when I watch soaps, the dialogue is just as flat and cliché and lacking in personality as the stories, so you know that no writer is allowed to do more than phone it in.

Edited by Faulkner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And then, on top of that, you have to answer for your part of the finished product, whether it came out the way you wanted it to or not. I can't imagine putting thought into your work, having it turned into something else, then going online and reading criticism of said work that is targeted at you. Not to defend writers that we know are sht - but to be a new writer coming into this crazy, sad, depressing world that is daytime drama in 2020? No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely not. Even if you manage to get one story out that you’re passionate about, I couldn’t imagine having to put my name on all the other stuff. Then you will have your reputation ruined because everybody will view you as a hack. 
 

I loved what Jamey Giddeons did with Ambitions. It was a true soap with all the elements needed to be successful: multi-generational, funny, sexy, romantic, full of intrigue, drama and social issues. Based on that I’d love to see him write Y&R, but you *know* he wouldn’t be allowed to write any of that. 

 

Social issues for example are what soaps are known for, but you aren’t allowed to write them because it’s too controversial. Relationships now are so predictable. There are no villains of true vixens. There just is now way I’d do it, nor would I want a writer I like doing a soap in today’s age. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you count.

Please register in order to view this content

And I am sure anyone who loves Erica Kane can think up some good stories.  

This reminds that last night I came across the drama surrounding Orlando Jones's firing from AMERICAN GODS which I've been meaning to watch, but now I will probably watch the seasons he was in and stop. Especially since what he was doing is very timely with what is going on for black people in the world. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, I would love to write for a soap, but at the same time I would NOT want to deal with everyone’s interference/b.s. There are some things I would want to do that would never be approved by the EP or the network. For example, if I wrote GH, I would’ve killed off Franco long ago and reunited Lucky and Elizabeth, something that we all know that Frank Valentini would never approve of. 

 

I wonder if the individual script writers have to deal with any of the interference. I wouldn’t mind doing that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Patrick Mulcahey says he’s had stuff cut out of his scenes by CBS while he was working at B&B. (Not literally out of his scripts, but material was filmed and later scrapped by CBS because they deemed it inappropriate for ridiculous reasons.)

Edited by Faulkner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Imma answer for myself and @Vee: No.

 

 

Man, I'd hate to be a script writer today. None of the scripts have any personality or character, it's just people regurgitating plot points at each other. For some reason I can't get this scene of Nick and Victoria on Y&R discussing the latest drama at Crimson Lights out of my head, from the dialogue you couldn't tell if they were lovers, friends, siblings or acquaintances. There was nothing there. They were literally just recapping the plot to each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
    • Might as well say it, Minority opinion, granted, but I like Joss & I'm okay with this WSB story & i hope that Emma will be their next recruit & she & Joss can be partners.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy