Jump to content

So in Today's Soap Climate...Could You?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I've been sitting here binging and formatting my novel and I wondered.

 

I know there are a lot of writings on this site. And a lot of you have excellent ideas, ways of plotting, and knowledge of soaps' past. 

 

So given how soaps are run now with producers with agenda, networks with interference, and actors with some egos...if you could write for any of the current soaps...would you? If so, why?

 

Bonus points if you want to spill some of your story ideas tea if you were hired.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I don’t think so.  I think any attempt to dot all the i’s and cross all the t’s, to build a long term storyline and play all the beats are done on these soaps.
 

Agenda storytelling has become the only way these shows get done anymore, at least since the early 2000’s.  The egos of network people and EP’s have replaced doing what is right for the show.  It’s pretty clear as they started killing off legacy characters and decimating families they themselves see no future in the product.

 

The writer has to have enough power to execute their vision.  Like a show runner.

 

If you asked me this 10 years ago though, I would have said HELL YES!!

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have no writer training whatsoever besides the extremely smutty Big Time Rush fan fiction I wrote while in college, so I'm not sure if my opinion is even valid, but my answer is not just "no" but "hellllll no." I love creating characters and developing stories in my head, but I get way too attached to my vision of how things would play out to consider working in an industry that can take your vision and completely flip it around to suit their needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seems like an utterly thankless job too, as you’re responsible for so much content. Sure, you’re paid pretty well, but you’re giving up a lot for it. There are just too many platforms available for writers these days that are less prescriptive and restrictive. Even many writers from well-regarded cable series have their horror stories of interference and just multiply that by a thousand on daytime. And when I watch soaps, the dialogue is just as flat and cliché and lacking in personality as the stories, so you know that no writer is allowed to do more than phone it in.

Edited by Faulkner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And then, on top of that, you have to answer for your part of the finished product, whether it came out the way you wanted it to or not. I can't imagine putting thought into your work, having it turned into something else, then going online and reading criticism of said work that is targeted at you. Not to defend writers that we know are sht - but to be a new writer coming into this crazy, sad, depressing world that is daytime drama in 2020? No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely not. Even if you manage to get one story out that you’re passionate about, I couldn’t imagine having to put my name on all the other stuff. Then you will have your reputation ruined because everybody will view you as a hack. 
 

I loved what Jamey Giddeons did with Ambitions. It was a true soap with all the elements needed to be successful: multi-generational, funny, sexy, romantic, full of intrigue, drama and social issues. Based on that I’d love to see him write Y&R, but you *know* he wouldn’t be allowed to write any of that. 

 

Social issues for example are what soaps are known for, but you aren’t allowed to write them because it’s too controversial. Relationships now are so predictable. There are no villains of true vixens. There just is now way I’d do it, nor would I want a writer I like doing a soap in today’s age. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you count.

Please register in order to view this content

And I am sure anyone who loves Erica Kane can think up some good stories.  

This reminds that last night I came across the drama surrounding Orlando Jones's firing from AMERICAN GODS which I've been meaning to watch, but now I will probably watch the seasons he was in and stop. Especially since what he was doing is very timely with what is going on for black people in the world. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, I would love to write for a soap, but at the same time I would NOT want to deal with everyone’s interference/b.s. There are some things I would want to do that would never be approved by the EP or the network. For example, if I wrote GH, I would’ve killed off Franco long ago and reunited Lucky and Elizabeth, something that we all know that Frank Valentini would never approve of. 

 

I wonder if the individual script writers have to deal with any of the interference. I wouldn’t mind doing that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Patrick Mulcahey says he’s had stuff cut out of his scenes by CBS while he was working at B&B. (Not literally out of his scripts, but material was filmed and later scrapped by CBS because they deemed it inappropriate for ridiculous reasons.)

Edited by Faulkner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Imma answer for myself and @Vee: No.

 

 

Man, I'd hate to be a script writer today. None of the scripts have any personality or character, it's just people regurgitating plot points at each other. For some reason I can't get this scene of Nick and Victoria on Y&R discussing the latest drama at Crimson Lights out of my head, from the dialogue you couldn't tell if they were lovers, friends, siblings or acquaintances. There was nothing there. They were literally just recapping the plot to each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
    • Another great episode.  GH has been pretty good this year, loading up the chamber, because now there's many bullets to fire, and another one was fired today when Nina found out Michael is the father of Sasha's baby.  I hope this secret comes out at the hearing.  I've also liked the slow burn with Gio/Emma. There's just so many things to look forward to on this show now.  GH is finally back to being really good. 
    • I'm all for it. Get them Nina!   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I am blown away that Christie Clark is 51, and she debuted 39 years ago. They gave her a lovely script today.  But, I could not think of any other examples in culture of someone able to jump right back into the skin of a character, after virtually retiring from acting years ago. I was trying to recall if Carrie left for a bit with Anna after Roman died (because she wasn't at Bo & Hope's wedding), and then returned as a pre-teen Christie?  Or if she was just SORASed off-screen?  But, whenever I see the character I am reminded how much more trauma she's endured than Sami, and yet she remains such a nice person.
    • Weirdly I feel like Nina was the most sus about the entire situation.  Normally I would have given this one to Carly, but Nina was always kind of trying to make it make sense. I think Nina (and Alexis) are actually really smart characters.  They just constantly get in their own way with dumb plans lol.
    • Rewatching some of 1991 I had to appreciate what a strong week March 5-12 1991 was. Cassandra dies, Nina shoots David, Sheila switces the babies, and drunk Nikki all occurring simultaneously. 1991 and 92 were pretty strong overall.
    • Still loving all the Gio fallout, but the scenes that really surprised me this episode were the ones with Nina and Maxie. I was not expecting Nina to be the one to put together all the pieces about Sasha's baby daddy. This custody hearing is about to get explosive!
    • I really hope after the secret comes out their interactions don't stop
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy