Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

In my opinion, Jill Farren Phelps would've thrived more in the daytime world if she would've gotten the opportunity to create or at least be in charge of a brand new soap. I think she would've loved working on a show in the vein of Irish Soap Opera Red Rock. I mean it had her favorite thing as an EP. 

 

  • Crime
  • Police
  • Murder Mystery 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

She gave her writers a lot of creative liberty at a Santa Barbara, which is what endeared it to a cult audience in the US and mass audience worldwide.

 

At GL, she was fortunate to have Nancy Curlee and Stephen Demorest for the start of her tenure. She would never work with writers as good again after this - she would either try to be the de facto HW like she was at OLTL, be sidelined like was at GH in favor of Guza, or steamroll over weak writers like Josh Griffith at Y&R.

 

AW was different situation as it was on the road to cancellation before she got there. NBC almost cancelled the show in 1993 along with Santa Barbara, but decided against it at the last moment. When DAYS had a commercial renaissance under Reilly in the mid 90’s and AW didn’t benefit from that, it’s fate was sealed.

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This. If nothing else, it would have been interesting to see how she did completely on her own terms. Of course, for the full experience (i.e. no way to rationalize whatever happened), it would have to be a primetime show. (See also, Hogan Sheffer making a movie, Frons doing an HBO show, etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would also say this was her big mistake as she didn't focus on long-term storylines. SB told stories the way PC would years later--in 13 week cycles. When you were between cycles, the show could be dull. If JFP had been able to bring long-term storytelling and non-Capwell stories into the show, I think SB would have lasted longer since Walker's departure was really the death knell. Instead, you'd always have a new bunch of characters you knew would probably not last more than a year. I think that 3/4 of Eden/Cruz/Robert storyline was one of the best stories they told, but it was forced on her and she and the writers just let it sputter out. Few of the SB stories told during her tenure actually had a great endings and long-lasting repercussions. Sadly, she took this way of producing a soap to every soap she subsequently worked on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love JFP. Fearless. A 42 year career in daytime, 11 Emmys. Took responsibility for bad decisions and blamed for decisions that were out of her control. Labelled a ‘show killer’ even though she was never the EP of a show as it went off the air. GL went off the air 14 years after she left the show. OLTL got cancelled 11years after she left. Y&R had its highest ratings in 9 years under her tenure. Since she left Y&R, the show has never achieved the ratings that she had. I just looked on IMDB. She’s going to be 70 soon. While I cannot speak for her, I’m sure she’s very content with her accomplishments and not paying any attention to people who listen to her every word on an hour podcast, taking notes and posting them here. She’s a fascinating woman who deserves every one of those 11 emmys and the stories behind them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Meh. 

 

Let's just say she didn't cause Frankie's death--she's still a soap killer. Jill still has a plethora of duds to still make fans loathe for her years to come. Maureen's unnecessary death to make room for Justin Deas, being such a piss poor EP that she allowed Bev McKinsey to slip out of her reach, Mel's death on OLTL, running off Robin Strasser from OLTL, killing Drew on OLTL, Alan's death on GH, disgustingly firing Genie Francis from GH, the decimation of the Qs, GH become mob central x1000, etc. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's very true as the Dobsons were often accused of dropping stories and characters out of the blue. Did SB ever have a long-term storyline? I'm more familiar with JFP's work on SB than the Dobsons so I noticed this pattern on all of the soaps she dismantled.

 

It's amusing to me that no one will take responsibility for Frankie's death even 24 years later. It's always someone else who made the decision. I remember Michael Logan writing a a column at the time where everyone passed the buck.

 

I tried to listen to the interview, but the interviewer spent so much time telling JFP how brave and exciting she was that it was sick making. I would really like an honest JFP interview, but I don't know if we'll ever get it.

Edited by chrisml
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think she would have no issues taking responsibility for Frankie’s death if she was responsible for it, like she does for Maureen’s - and Maureen was a much more significant tent pole character than Frankie ever was.
 

I never gave a sh!t about Mel or Mel/Dorian, so I can’t say I was disappointed when she blew that sh!t up to pieces. Poorly done storytelling, but the Mel character was often nonsense who tried to turn Dorian into Vikki. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She doesn't really take responsibility for Maureen's death based on the interview. She makes a lot of excuses (some she has to know make no sense), and she still doesn't understand why people were angry. JFP is either deluded or so self-satisfied that she doesn't get it. 

 

I found her OLTL painful to watch because the women suddenly become oversexed idiots (Nora) and she fired Laura Bonarrigo in the most brutal of ways. OLTL became so dark and angry under JFP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She did say if she had to re-do it, she’d pick another character to kill off than Maureen. But she does try to victimize herself a bit in that part.

 

The excuse that they made viewers care too much about the character just before they killed her off is ridiculous. People don’t grow attached to characters in mere weeks before they’re killed/written out...

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
    • Josh continues to try and milk Abbott/Newman rivalry. First it was Billy/Victoria, then Kyle/Summer, then Noah/Allie (that worked out well) and now Kyle/Claire. Do we have any inkling when Billy Flynn will arrive and who he will play? I'm sure Cole's illness will mostly play offscreen. What's in store for Nick and Sharon? Is it time to put them back together? I can't see any other romantic options. Nick has no children on the canvas to play off, as Christian is never seen. Sharon has only Mariah onscreen.
    • I would appreciate (if they're not coming), for future scripts to refer to them by their iconic hairdos.  For example, if Hope needs to call Chelsea because Bo has Sepsis, I'd like Shawn-D to say, "My Mom called Chelsea (the one with the sassy short black hair) for an update." Also, new rule, if Melanie does return, she needs to dye her hair back to red.  I googled who she was five times during Victor's funeral.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Broderick, thank you for all of the info [I edited for space]. I am so grateful for everyone filling in the blanks for me. I suspected the Nora/Eliot scene was very important and it was setting something up but I didn't know what. Can't wait to see it play out. The two actors had such a great back and forth. I should have made the Paige/Patty Hearst connection. I thought Paige was in love with Brian from the first episode I watched but it seemed as if they were brother and sister. Steve kept being affectionate with her so I assumed he was the love interest. Then she was affectionate with someone else and well..she's a very busy woman. I can't wait to see Frances Fisher show up. (I'm trying to be vague because I don't know what would be a spoiler in this storyline) Now it makes sense why Draper would be upset. I didn't get the whole background of why he didn't go to NY. I'm a sucker for good acting, so I might still side with April and Margo, if the writers don't give Draper more to do besides yelling.  He had more chemistry with Logan, but I know that's not happening.  Something else I noticed: the show really takes care with even the smallest parts. The acting is superb. Too often, I noticed on older soaps they don't take care with the recurring or day players (Ryan's Hope was so bad with this that I couldn't make it through some episodes). It's only been six episodes, but so far, the casting department was spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy