Jump to content

Soaps In The Time of Crisis


Recommended Posts

  • Members

With #marketcrash trending all day, I was reminded of an event nicknamed Black Monday (which really should've been Red Monday, in the interest of speaking the accurate language of finance), which was on October 19, 1987.  I thought about what episode was airing that day on my favorite soap. As The World Turns had been pretty strong pretty much all year long in 1987, which made me wonder whether, in the midst of financial market chaos, the soaps perhaps served as some form of consistency in the middle of the chaos.  Which begs the question:

As soap fans, can you think of other days when you associate a soap/soaps as being a form of comfort, or refuge in a time of upheaval or crisis? It doesn't have to be a national or international crisis but some date/time in which you considered to be a particularly chaotic event.

 

This episode was/is particularly topical since it featured a storyline where a bank executive actually assisted a wealthy person in an act of kindness--to pay off the debts of a struggling family farm that was headed to foreclosure.  How's that for irony?!

 

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 189
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Same here.

 

I can’t name any specific episodes, but whenever I was going through some serious personal stuff, I could always count on DOOL, Passions and later on GH and reruns of AW, Dallas, Dynasty and Knots Landing to cheer me up. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's going to be interesting to see how soaps will deal with the real catastrophe ahead. Coronavirus. Evidence around the world seems to suggest it will spread around the US as well and cause most areas to lockdown before the emergency becomes too much of a strain for the health system. How are soaps going to shoot the shows if people can't leave their houses / can't touch each other and so on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

@Aback I'm still pondering your question today, with that clip of The View panelists introducing the show to an empty audience floating around. There is an article about some talk shows and shows like Jeopardy taping in with no audience and it made me think that soaps really are unsustainable, not because of audiences (other than the crew, there is none) but because of the level of intimacy that characters are expected to have.  Even though, for several years now, soaps have had less passion and true intimacy, which is a definite complaint from fans but they still throw in sex scenes.  To have a soap without kissing or embracing, these shows would have to do something more akin to a Jane Austen dramatization (which could be entertaining if done well) and I think that is slightly above the pay-grade and expertise of today's soap showrunner. 

In other words, unless this pandemic is decreased and elminated within the next couple of weeks, I think the soaps could be screwed.

 

Also, I wonder what will The Price Is Right do without their signature big crowd in the audience?

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

You see, the thing is... if a make-up artist is positive, they'll infect one of the actors or vice versa.

 

No production is sustainable. Soaps will have to take a hiatus. TV shows, films too.

 

I wish this thing could go away in a couple of weeks but I'll be brutally honest. It's going to take some getting used to.

While you're reading this, please guys: don't wait for the state you're in to declare a state of emergency. Just act as if the emergency was already in place - because it is. Don't go out. Insist on working from home if you can. Wash your hands every 20 minutes. Use a handsanitizer if you're outside and you touch money bills. Refuse kindly to shake hands or hug people. Keep a 6,5 foot distance from other people. Don't share headhphones. Don't stockpile on the groceries and drugs because that's morally wrong.

 

But most of all, don't trust me - trust the World Health Organization. Check their social media channel as well as the World Economic Forum's videos. They are very informative.

 

Please guys. We can beat this. But we need to cut social contact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't really watch daytime soaps anymore but I would tune in if they started to show the classic era soaps from the 1980s and back.  Have Retro daytime television with their most successful line up of shows.  If CBS brought back classic episodes of Y&R, B&B, As The World Turns and Guiding Light, I'd tune in for sure, forget today's soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just saw that SNL sketch and don't give these showrunners any ideas, they may just try some of them, especially with the budgets hitting rock bottom, from what I've heard.

 

Have any of these soap blogs/podcasts discussed what the pandemic would mean for these soaps? I mean actual in-depth discussion or analysis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • No idea if this one had ever been up before or what the exact date is, but it's always good to look at/save the new AMC content while you can. If you're here for the drama there is some delirium with Adam and Erica about 10-12 minutes in.

      Please register in order to view this content

      @Vee @Jonathan @Maxim @All My Shadows @alwaysAMC @Contessa Donatella @Soaplovers @DemetriKane @dragonflies @AMCOLTLLover @Khan @Paul Raven @slick jones @Wendy @DeeVee @j swift @EricMontreal22 @AmandainNC28655 @Wilsoky @Franko @Liberty City @robbwolff @Soapsuds @soapfan770 @FrenchFan
    • I think there's a story to tell in someone who always believed in honesty and integrity being emmeshed in so many lies, but I agree that it wasn't very well laid out over the last few months. I think if I was more invested in Lois, I would have more of an issue than I do. Few can hold up against Jane. This is one of those cases where I think mentioning who already switched babies or have long-lost children would just take away from the fallout. If Lulu wants to drag Brook Lyn for hypocrisy there is probably still time (if the show bothers). I don't think anyone would claim these are the best GH episodes ever. It may be very lowered expectations at play. But I do think that scenes like yesterdays were some of Tracy's best, as she is a character who is often not allowed that type of moment.
    • You would think that, wouldn't you? I'd almost think they needed the money to get Robert Newman back, but they also had to know Larkin wasn't going to stick around and play second banana either. I don't get what the writers thought they were doing with Calla. Long liked using actors from Texas, but other than Alex/Bev McKinsey, the characters she wrote for them seemed blah.
    • Bo has a bad history with kids named Zach. (too soon?)
    • Christie said in her interview this week that she recently started taking acting classes again, and has been doing some work in England, so that helped her to jump into Carrie for this (as well as it being all so familiar, it really was home.)
    • Andrea Barber aka Kimmy Gibbler did have a few scenes with Drake too, when he first came on. Christie came in the middle of that storyline 
    • Carrie, as played by Andrea Barber, was at Bo & Hope's wedding. She was the flower girl. The ringbearer was Zachary Parker, the little boy that Megan tried to pass off as her and Bo's son. Andrea's Carrie was at Tony & Anna's real wedding (Aug. 5, 1985). She appeared for the last time on March 21, 1986. Christie's Carrie debuted on April 14, 1986. It appears that Carrie remained in Salem, just off-screen, during that near-month. Christie picked up with what Andrea had been playing, apprehension over John.
    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy