Jump to content

Retconning: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 318
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

LOL, yes, Scarlett O'Hara was capricious, stubborn, selfish and wont to delude herself. But viewers and readers are often presented with less-than-noble lead characters. Wuthering Heights is my favorite novel of all time, but both the romantic leads, Heathcliff and Catherine, are dreadful people. Stanley and Blanche in A Streetcar Named Desire would never receive Christmas-dinner invitations from me either. Margaret Mitchell has gone on record to say that she, herself, considers Melanie Wilkes the true heroine of GTWT, and that Scarlett is an example of what not to be.

 

Unfortunately, slavery was a grim fact in the old south, and while characters like Mammy and Prissy were never free to go where they wanted and do as they pleased, critics cannot condemn GWTW for acknowledging that reality. Margaret Mitchell and the filmmakers were bound by history to portray slavery as part of that era.

 

Brooke Hamilton from Days was not the first character to return from the dead on daytime TV. It had happened numerous times before. Even on the same show, Tommy Horton, Jr., had returned from the dead a decade before Brooke did. He had been a casualty of the Korean war...or so the Horton family thought. He later turned up in Salem with amnesia, and was unrecognizable thanks to extensive plastic surgery. His own sister, Marie, fell in love with him before his real identity was revealed. Talk about a shocking storyline. Having a young woman fall in love with her brother in the mid-1960s was very daring. Poor Marie had to run away and become a nun!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is the line that Brooke was the first character actually killed off in the show's present day to come back?

 

I have only seen one episode of each actress. The second Brooke seemed very theatrical (as she was, apparently) so I don't know how viewers felt about her, but after all the trouble they went to bringing her back it seems like a cheat she was killed off so fast. 

 

The one episode I've seen of Adrienne was wonderful (I think maybe I've seen two, now that I think of it). She was luminous. I don't know if Bill Bell had any hand in her casting but she would have fit into Y&R of that era.

 

I really really really wish even a few more episodes from that period were available to see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yep.  That's what I meant.  Thanks, Carl, for saying it better than I could have.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 Carl, you have just given me a memory flashback, LOL.

 

Back in the 1970s, Daily TV Serials was one of my favorite magazines. It was colorful, informative, a bit irreverant, and always a fun read.

 

In a year-end review, the editor once reported that he had criticized Adrienne LaRussa's  work as Brooke Hamilton. He had opined in the magazine that her performances were "embarrassingly trite." He later met AL at a social gathering, where she confronted him and demanded, "What right do you have to say I give terrible performances?" The editor smugly replied, "The same right that allows you to give them."

 

AL was a gorgeous woman with an usual, fascinating look. While I did not think she was the world's greatest actress, she had a certain something. I thought it was unnecessary and spiteful for Daily TV Serials to print the story about the confrontation with AL. It was like spitting on an opponent when she was unable to fight back.

 

The second actress to play Brooke, Eileen Barrett, was a warmer actress, and brought vulnerability to the role. The show was just at a point where they could have redeemed the character (her misdeeds had been outed and she was broken) when they killed her off. It was dreadful watching her final scene. Brooke was alone in her car, sobbing as she drove. Reflecting on her life, she cried aloud, "Bob doesn't love me. No one loves me. No one...has...ever loved me." Then she lowered her head against the steering wheel as the sobs overcame her, and she crashed the vehicle and died. UGH!

 

What a horrible way to go. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I'm surprised Daily TV Serials was that petty - I associate that more with Daytimers or Daytime TV Stars.

 

That last scene for Eileen's Brooke sounds awful. I have seen so little of that era of DAYS but sometimes it sounds like they were trying to actively chase away viewers, between things like this and what they did to Laura Horton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

I would never consider Melanie the heroine of GWTW.

Yes, Scarlett is all of the things you mention, but she's also resourceful, resilient, intelligent, independent and strong. She's a flawed person, with good sides and bad sides, and much more interesting than Melanie. Scarlett accepts life the way it is while Melanie clings to a way of life that is gone forever. She even states that she will cling to her hatred of the yankees for the rest of her life and that she will pass her hatred on to her children and grandchildren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

After Pat Falken Smith and Wes Kenny were fired, the show almost instantly fell into a slump. TPTB kept making one horrible decision after another, most of which alienated and infuriated the audience. Laura leaving Jennifer Rose on a bus was ghastly. Her later hanging herself, ditto. Days had always been predicated on leisurely-paced family conflict and romantic angst, with only the occasional bout of violence if it were essential to a long-term story arc. The show's sudden switch to action-driven stories and shock-value stunts was NOT what viewers expected or wanted to see. I think many old-guard viewers left Days and drifted over to Y&R, which was the type of soap Days used to be.

 

I see your point and actually agree with you. For all her faults, Scarlett was an interesting character and a survivor, while Melanie was a sweet and kind-hearted relic of times gone by. But when being asked about this topic, Mitchell did say that Melanie was the true heroine of the story (probably because Melanie was a "saint" while Scarlett was a "sinner". ) I think that Melanie is the sort of character whom mothers of past generations might want their daughters to be, but Scarlett is the type of character whom those daughters would NEED to be in the tough, real world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Her mother had been mentally ill and in a catatonic state for many years, which compelled Laura to become a psychiatrist. Laura, herself, had never exhibited any signs of mental problems until after Jennifer Rose was born. .She was just suddenly unbalanced. The writing was not very nuanced or layered; the foundation was not really there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also don't believe it was medically accurate.  If Laura were schizophrenic, as the show seemed to suggest, then the symptoms would have manifested much earlier in her life.

 

I have to give props, though, to Sheri Anderson, Leah Laiman and Thom Racina for remembering Laura's medical past (however questionable it was) when the adult Jennifer worried that she would inherit the same mental illness.  And, of course, we see now the same mental instability in Abigail, now don't we?

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Do you think the show could have portrayed Laura's mental problems as postpartum  depression that it could have helped with the sudden onslaught of mental illness for the character?

 

 

In regards to GWTW.. I viewed Melanie and Scarlet as two sides of a coin... the two sides of a personality... People wanting to be more like Melanie, but in reality more like  Scarlet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • HAHAHA. Yeah, that's my bad. I misread that line. Sorry about going into "Unnecessary" detail about my username. Anyway, I love the story behind your Username.    reading on my phone...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Completely agree with you. I think Bonita Brisker has been really good as Sharon. What Anita did was obviously awful, so she doesn't need to reign anything in. We're getting a good look at someone who's struggled in life compared to Anita "We're the Duprees!" Williams.   -- Anita is starting to look foolish for dredging all this up just so she  can get her ass back on stage. Is she so delusional she doesn't realize how she hurt Sharon and Tracy? -- Anita's line to Vernon "How can I expect Sharon to forgive me when I haven't forgiven myself" struck me as really selfish. After all that with Sharon, Anita again made it all about herself. -- Does anyone really believe Anita wants equal billing if the Articulettes reunite?  -- Colby Muhammad continues to be a standout. Her Kat more than holds her own with Leslie. -- The writing was very good for the father/daughter scene between Ted and Eva. It wasn't so good between Ted and Martin in their father/son scene. It didn't play like family to me, especially when Ted referred to "my wife" when talking about Nicole to Martin. -- Overall, a very solid show today.    
    • I honestly do not see the point of Max coming back again. Zoe does not surprise me. I've been waiting for that since Bionic Woman flopped in the US, frankly. I'm not against it vs. some other pointless returns. Some returns work and some don't, some are just there. Like, am I grateful that Kathy is alive? Yes, absolutely. Do I love any of her stories? No. But she's not utterly destroyed, she's just there.
    • I think Frank probably wanted to try for Jonathan with Kate Mansi. I actually can't knock the idea of a Lucky/Kristina affair or flirtation on paper, as a romantic obstacle to LNL2, but not with the characters in the places they are at present or have been over the last few years. It would be a mistake to do right now and would poison the well. I think Jonathan probably made it clear when he came back that he wanted what had been promised to him years ago with Elizabeth, and between his not being one of FV's preferred focal leads and Liz being a grudging afterthought if she's not with one of his OLTL stars, I suspect FV was content to leave them where they are vs. where they should be, which is central on the show. It's like I said a few days ago: A lot of this is how Lulu has always been. But back in the day the issue was that Lulu (and Carly) were deified for it, whereas now it's that Lulu is just used as the heavy because FV has a preexisting favoritism for Setton/BLQ. And that's a waste of a key character and talent, namely Alexa Havins.
    • Melanie Smith was very difficult to replace, but as KMH did last for a long time, she clearly managed to do so. I preferred Melanie, but the main issue with Kelley is I just think she was horribly written for most of the time. Initially the writing wasn't horrible, it's more she was not the right choice, but over time the writing genuinely became awful, and unplayable, with a few exceptions (I think her pairings with Chris and Hal worked and got to take her in some new directions).
    • Coming into June and...   TRASH. Or as I like to say for moments like this...HUNNI, WHAT IS THIS?   Outside of seeing Traci come home...and then...Ashley...not a darn thing is going on. So they are clearing stalling now, aren't they? It really hit me during the Phyllis/Daniel scenes. It was feeling like a B&B scene where two characters have the same repetitive conversation. And I have not seen Phyllis/Daniel scenes in that light lately so yeeeeah NOPE.   I did like the touch of Traci arrived outside of the Abbott mansion door and taking a breath and looking around. Very aftereffects of Martin. And I liked her and Diane having their conversation about Martin. I wished JG had allowed Traci to stay in town to deal with her feelings about Martin so at least we are getting some follow-up on that.    And same with Ashley and her talk with Jack. I will take Eileen Davidson anyway I can get her. Dare I say...will she be around for the Dumas reveal?   Outside of...   Kyle, Claire, and Harrison in a park IS NOT a storyline.   Sharon having to use the phrases (and in text) with Nick dinner as friends IS NOT a storyline.   Giggly Heffa giggly-heffa-ing around town IS NOT a storyline.    With Damian MIA and my love of Eileen Davidson...I might just go on break until the Dumas reveal if this is how we are starting June. 
    • Dragging this quote over from the Texas thread just because it shows a reference to Bay City as a fictional location at least as early as 1981. It doesn't quote Gail Kobe as saying it directly but the point she is making about the Houston setting of Texas does seem to take it for granted that Bay City is not real.
    • It's too bad they couldn't get access to the old music cues from the 80s and 90s, to run with the flashbacks or in the current scenes. That would have added a lot. Imagine if they had played the old Roman and Marlena theme.
    • Wonder if any of the Beyond the Gates people were asked. Admittedly, the show hasn't been on long enough for any of those actors to get much interest.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy