Jump to content

They really need to start programming Saturday nights again


soapfan770

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Certainly some of us do wind up staying home some Saturday evenings like I did this past one and it's just unbelievable that there is nothing on TV on Saturday nights outside of college football these days and SNL of course. Granted I understand the reasoning for giving up on Saturday nights and half way giving up on Friday nights but still it's lame and a sorry sight to see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

On the one hand, I agree.  But, on the other hand, weren't Friday nights in the post-DALLAS era considered a wasteland before "The X-Files" came on the scene?  Not that Friday nights aren't a wasteland again, but my point is, all it takes is for one good show to catch on with the audience during a night the networks have given up on (...like Saturday nights...) to reverse this way of thinking.  And these days, at least, I feel positive that that could still happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Saturday's use to be ratings success…NBC had the best with 227….The Golden Girls……Empty Nest…..Now we get crappy programming on Saturday due to no one is at home on Saturdays attitude ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd say its been at least a good 15 years since whenever both Walker Texas Ranger and The District went off the air that the networks gave up completely on anything scripted for that night. I think CBS tried one year with Canadian content(Like ABC does in the summertime) but it didn't work. Even the cable networks don't have anything going either mainly airing third-rate movies or reality show reruns that don't have much of an audience in the first place. 

 

Of course in addition to the above 227 and The Golden Girls mentions go even a bit further back and see that All in the Family and MTM were the Saturday night staples of the '70s.

 

I can't remember where the Friday night death slot idea originated from aside that Friday nights can be a boom or bust cycle for shows. Even in the '90s the networks got by well with Fox airing X-Files, ABC's TGIF block, and NBC having Unsolved Mysteries and Homicide that night. These days shows like Blue Bloods, Hawaii Five-O, Grimm, and Reign seem all have stable audiences although in the cases of the CBS Fri night line-up the demographics are indeed very hideous in spite of overall both being considered Top-20 shows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember watching the whole NBC Saturday night lineup in the '80s, all the comedies and then "Hunter". Good times. And shows were a hit on Saturdays! Then came the NBC '90s era and "Sisters".

 

Sad to see what has become of Saturdays, although with ratings being beyond anemic, I do get why the networks have essentially given up on Saturdays. Fridays are barely alive, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Specifically, the 1973-1974 season:

 

8PM: All In the Family

8:30 PM: M.A.S.H.

9PM: Mary Tyler Moore

9:30 PM: Bob Newhart

10PM: The Carol Burnett Show

 

At least ABC found a way to work with Friday night with the TGIF lineup for kids. Hell, in the 70's, they had the precursor to TGIF by showing stuff like The Brady Bunch and The Partridge Family on Friday nights!  

The 1971-1972 Friday night lineup on ABC was:

8PM: The Brady Bunch

8:30 PM The Partridge Family

9PM: Room 222

9:30 PM: The Odd Couple

10PM: Love American Style

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This has always been my opinion, too. Older people will watch scripted shows on Saturday nights. Hallmark Channel has had success with naturally older-skewing shows on Saturdays for the last few years. I don't understand the technicalities of it all, but if the networks and advertisers could just get off the 18-49 tit for a night, they'd have something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy