Jump to content

Josh Duggar: 12 year old Molestation charges Surface


John

Recommended Posts

  • Members
  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Disgusting people. Throw God in your response 1 million times but it won't change the fact that your son is a freak who preys on the opposite sex and you covered it up. Then, when they finally turn him in, it's to a perv they knew would keep it quiet?! Unreal! Garbage people!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One does not have to be over 21 to be a molestor.

Fact is Josh even admitted doing this to underage girls. That is a preadator in the making

Supposedly he got help but Michelle has said, he went to a Labor camp

Has he dealt with this? Does he care about the girls whose lives he changed forever

ETA: I cant blame Josh's folks for his actions. Yes they may teach things that repress wants, desires etc but that doesnt give a then 15 year old the right to molest girls and then get it swiped under the rug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And the "counseling" he got was working with some guy on manual labor.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/duggar-spawn-family-research-council-leader-resigns-over-molestation-charges

I'm already seeing people praise and defend this family, because as long as you hate the right people (gays and women and "non-believers"), you can do whatever you want.

And People will likely keep on writing out those checks too. It's sad to think a HATE GROUP like FRC cut ties and People likely will not.

This family works 24/7 to persecute anyone who is not just like them, and now we know why - it's because they are full of sickness.

They're lucky that the world we live in rewards the likes of them time and time again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They said he had just turned 14. I didn't say anything about needing to be 21, but where is the line? Can a 10 year old be a molester? It's hard for me to think children that age really understand what they're doing. I think there is a reason the law is set up to protect children's anonymity before the age of 18 even when they've done something wrong.

And maybe you can't blame his parents, but I can and I do. Why didn't they get him real help the first time this happened? They have money, they should have hired the best child psychologists out there to get to the bottom of it. Was it repressed curiosity or some larger problem? Why wouldn't you try to get those answers ASAP and then do something about it? There's no excuse for that, they were the adults in this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly cant see how parents can devote enough attention to all the kids when you have 19. Some are bound to slip through the cracks with problems going unnnoticd. I never liked this family nad thought it was selfish of them to have so many kids

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At 14 most psychologists say that we know right from wrong. So yes I do believe its all on Josh. I just cant stomach that all these statements are about how this still affects josh to this day. I dont give a [!@#$%^&*] about Josh. If he had remorse his number one thought would be: What did I do to these grls and how are they todday. But no its all about the Duggars,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Apparently rumors of this have been online for 8 years.

Why am I not surprised TLC turned a blind eye for the cash.

Disgusting. I hate that network so much. It profits off the backs of little girls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even with this news Im sure the Duggars will still have lots of fans who buy his turn to god helped Josh get on the right path so I see TLC sticking with the show

With Boo Boo, Most viewers just watched cause the family was universally seen as a train wreck so when the mom dated the guy who molested one of her kids, the show had no fans to back that up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJxpFaAp_UY/ Roman vs. Stefano, Cliff top, Beach Below This is one of the most important scenes on DAYS in the 80s. After this nothing was ever the same. DAYS 11-23-84   @JAS0N47Closing Credits roll & it's complete silence. Isn't that unusual?
    • Mack was the show's moral compass and his groundedness complimented Karen's hysteria perfectly. Also, Kevin Dobson was the best looking male cast member with a huge fan base. He was never going to be killed off...
    • As others (I think) have said, Long just didn't get Nola and Quint. I guess it would've been hard to write them into adventure type stories with two kids, but they just fell off the map after AJ's birth. (or even the wedding/honeymoon) Long would've had to rewrite something, because Alex forced the Chamberlains out of Spaulding in the fall of '84. Not that she couldn't have just ignored it and written Quint and Henry being involved at the firm. I swear there was some plot point she just literally ignored that surprised me, but as I'm floating around between years, I can't recall what it was. lol Has anyone found the first day of the Kyle/Lewis dinner party up in English? After he took over Lewis Oil, Kyle arranged a dinner party. All hell breaks loose--Mindy admits to shooting Kyle, Vanessa remembers Reva's accident, and Billy and Reva get into a screaming match and she tells HB that Billy blackmailed her out of her Lewis shares. The last three minutes (or so) of the episode are up, where Kyle tells the assembled that HB's his father. And the next episode picks up with Sally entering the fray. Y'all know I'm dying to hear Billy and Reva go at it. As dicey as '85 is, I love it anytime when Billy isn't Reva's bitch.  
    • The original premise of "Santa Barbara" was that a Lockridge (Warren) killed a Capwell (Channing), who loved an Andrade (Santana), while a Perkins (Joe) went to jail for the crime. I think once the show started to pull away the threads by eliminating Joe and naming a new killer a lot of the show's original potential was lost. I contend, like others, that the fault lied in the uninspiring casting, which leads me to wonder if that's why the show became so keen on casting soap veterans for nearly every pivotal role.  The failure of the Perkins family was definitely a casting issue followed by a lack of interest in committing to the original onscreen characterization. I was fascinated watching the early episodes and realizing that the Perkins had been financially wiped out by the trial, which was an underlying current towards John's animosity towards his son. Then, the additional complication of Marissa's nearly incestual affection for Joe that led to her cutting off John sexually was a wild moment to witness, but not as strong as it could have been with a stronger actor in the role of John Perkins. Melissa Brennan wasn't the right choice for the aspiring young vixen that Jade was intended to be. Brennan may have breathed life into Laken, but I'm not sure how Julia Ronnie would have done in the role of Jade.  Despite the recorded history, Christina Robertson and Sarah Gallagher weren't sisters; they were aunt and niece.  I don't think it would have hurt to make Marissa and Augusta sisters, but I think it would have made the Joe / Augusta seduction impossible unless you truly mimick "Rituals" and make Joe Sarah's stepson. I think a childhood friendship between the two women would have worked. It would have also given Augusta someone to confide in about the situation involving Peter Flint and herself as Marissa would have been aware of Peter from her work at the pre school. As childhood friends that were estranged by class differences, I think a relationship between Augusta and Joe (and later Augusta and a sexually frustrated John) would have had multiple layers to play out giving a deeper impact on Augusta's involvement in both of the men in Marissa's life. And because I have thought about this all too much, I would have Augusta and Marissa square off again when Jade, after marrying Ted while pregnant, learned that the little Capwell heir was in fact an imprisoned Warren's son only for Augusta to ultimately keep mum because with Ted married to Jade he wasn't free to pursue Laken.  I imagine the Andrades would have slowly been withdrawn from the Capwell inner circle as the truth about Santana, Channing, Jr., and the baby came to light for everyone. In what I seen in the 1980s, Rosa confronts C.C. once about the baby and then seems to move on. Early in the run, the actor playing Reuben claims he and Bridget Dobson had a falling out and implied that she was racist which led to the character fading into the woodwork.  I know I am like maybe one of two people who liked the 1990s run of the Dobsons, but I loved the set up for Santana / C.C. with the Andrades having owned the land that Oasis sat on years earlier posing Santana to come into money while also potentially landing a position where she could raise Gina's son with C.C. if C.C. and Santana could have secured custody of the child. With Eden gone, I would have gone back to Santana and Cruz, but if not, I think Brick should have returned to be Santana's conscience and potential love interest.     
    • Well, I'm not going to shoot you, so no worries there. If it's subpar i hate hearing that. It was an old DVD not even mine a former partner. I thought why not make use of it. Serves me right for thinking. But to be clear, white label, www.radiomemory.com 
    • Just compared the open on Friday's episode with the first week episodes. I think the difference is that the bass line is much more apparent -- stronger and harder.
    • Phew, that was close to disaster!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I suspect we would have had a few withdrawals next year if Israel had won. I don't think many people would relish going to Jerusalem as things stand now. Not to mention it would have been a prime target for terrorist attacks.   
    • And they've given us plenty. Sets, outdoor scenes, music licensing, etc. And that was the point of me using DAYS... so. It's obvious the casino set is not intended for long-term use, hence why it's likely it wasn't as evolved as the other community sets, etc.
    • Enjoy Errol!  Your guy! Teehee @Errol  

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy