Jump to content

ALL: Haven't they already met?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Thank you. That's what I thought. It was a weird add-on considering Olivia came on the canvas in 1990 and, obviously, the Ashley character was on during that entire time. I consider that more bizarre than some of the examples above because the characters were very well known to each during that period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You're welcome. If this wasn't introduced earlier, I think the show was just trying to find a convenient reason to bring Ashley and Olivia together so that Ashley could learn that Victoria is Olivia's patient, so they retconned/adjusted the backstory. Ashley and Olivia got together to discuss going to a reunion and the dialogue and the actors played it as if they used to have good times but hadn't necessarily kept in touch. So it fit. And, obviously, they weren't insta biffles but the friendship stuck and built over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That has always been a myth. There were plenty of strong friendships and interactions. It's just that Y&R wasn't, say, ATWT. ATWT could have had Lisa walk into Tom & Margo's bedroom while they were having sex, chit chat while they ran into Kim and discussed Frannie's storyline, all while Tom and Margo went on, and I wouldn't really bat an eye. laugh.png Also, due to Y&R's slower pace, it would be death to include tons of scenes with interactions because then it would take eight years to finish a story instead of just four. In a way, faster-paced soaps had to do a lot of it to generate material.

Perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's an excellent analysis. Though I remember in the late 80s - especially. You'd have long scenes of nothing - example: Jill storms into the mansion, slams the door, walks in the living screaming "Katherine!" cut to Katherine putting down her tea and giving Jill a long stare, back to Jill seething - commercial. There were a lot of scenes in an episode where nothing really happened. This was a huge contrast to ATWT where it always seemed alive with stuff happening in every scene with interaction between many characters - it felt much more like a community. I enjoyed both shows during that era - especially when they were back-to-back (ATWT moved for B&B after Capitol was axed).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought it was Michael who had known Rachel in high school.

Re Y&R I recall that Katherine knew of the Abbott's when Jack came to her trying to stop Jill marrying John but was not close to them.

Later when Dina came along,it was established that she and Dina had been close friends earlier at the time Dina was having the affair with Brent.And then later John and Katherine talked about the early days of their friendship whan they were young.

So was there some rewriting going on??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re: Katherine and Abbotts - most definitely a new back history for Katherine. What made it kind of ridiculous was that Jill being so embedded with Katherine's life, certainly would've had some similar exposure to the family. Instead it was like Jill started working at Jabot. (The reality is that if Katherine was "so close" to John, she would've put the kabosh on Jill EVER getting a job there. Plus, John would've known all about the history with Jill and P2.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, they rewrote that storyline to make Katherine & John Abbott school classmates. I think they also claimed Katherine went to school with Stuart Brooks and Earl & Allison Bancroft.

Bill Bell kept certain characters in storyline groupings, but seemed to like them all interact at some point with Katherine.

Speaking of John Abbott, I'm almost certain that before Ashley & Traci came on, he was talking about his girls and gave their names as Traci and Tiffany.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honest mistake here by the poster, because that is the kind of thing shows do all the time. And maybe Anna and Luke come across like classic characters still interacting after all these years. But the show actually didn't do that. They did acknowledge Anna and Luke having never met back in the day.

The part of the scene I am talking about starts at 1:50

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The switch between John and Roman was handled incredibly badly, in a lot of different ways.

Roman immediately assumed John's rivalry with Victor. People forget just how long and deep the RoJohn/Victor rivalry ran. Abe once talked about RealRoman and Victor having a long history of going up against each other, when in fact they had very little history.

On RoJohn's end, when he was being held prisoner at Maison Blanche there was a calender on the wall that he had drawn up the last time he was there. It was written by John Black, as if that was his known name at the time. In actual fact, John Black was a name he picked off a sign at the midnight mission when he first arrived in Salem as the pawn. His face was in bandages, and he had no memory.

Drake went to TPTB to complain. He pointed this story out to them. They just laughed and said: "well, maybe it was a lie." Drake's comments years later, when recounting the story, was this: "That one hurt. It still does."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They could entire theses on the many continuity errors found within John Black's convoluted back stories. At this point, I am beginning to think the man is really one of Eugene Bradford's robots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought of another one from AMC - in 2004 during Erica's intervention, Erica's half-brother Mark acted as if he'd never laid eyes on Kendall. Mark attended Mona's funeral almost exactly 10 years prior to that though, and he knew exactly who Kendall was when she walked into the visitation. Granted, I don't think Mark and Kendall really interacted much in 1994, but it was still a little strange that he acted as if he'd never met her in 2004.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Bizarrely, while I didn't see it, I distinctly remember my younger sister telling me. We were walking to the store, and at the top of the hill she let out "Roger raped Holly", and I swear I remember it echoing for what seemed like forever. She would've been five at the time.  I know,,,which I find extraordinary. I have toyed with the idea of watching Another World for Maeve, Kathleen Widdoes and Beverlee. But watching Vanessa call Emma Snyder "momma" kinda weirded me out. LOL.
    • I have my fingers crossed for a baby to be named Monica Michelle & called Monica. And, yes, I do realize that is not equal to having her onscreen but, like you said & of course a recast is unthinkable. 
    • I would love to have Monica on screen. Leslie Charleson has died. She played the role for 46 years. Monica should pass as well. No one is going to accept a long-term recast for Monica, no matter how great  the actress they could get.
    • Coming into June...   It just occurred to me that seeing Carter/Hope engaged that there was something missing. Oh, yeah! DAPHNE. I missed a few episodes, but she left, right? So is Ridge going to be the spoiler for Carter/Hope now? I felt that Daphne/Carter/Hope had more legs to it. But I guess we will see.   I did enjoy that show circling back around to Luna/Will/Electra. Katie was spitting nothing, but truth. Same for Sheila. And it's good to see Luna vs Electra, and they gave off more adversary chemistry this time around versus when they were at Deacon's.    I was happy to see Liam reduced to C plot.
    • To bring over from the May Sweeps Thread from @Chris B   I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.   I agree. While it has been hit and miss no question, I have found it fascinating to watch what the costume designer is attempting to do with the various characters and their clothes. Some have been overdue. Some have been fascinating. But (outside of Billy) not boring to watch. I definitely find it more modern as well.   My growing issue has been it's not good that the best reason to watch Y&R as of late has been to see what people are wearing rather than the writing. It feels like a red flag.
    • Haha. The fact that I stopped regularly viewing at the same time and know what you are talking about is chef's kiss.    I'm slowly bingewatching Nurse's Ball Week. But it's slow for me because a lot of the same tics and writing flaws for me that made me throw up my hands is still evident *cough*CVE*cough* Thankfully, there are some things I like also and from a glance in the GH May Thread, it seem like it had a good Sweeps with good fallout. And do I even need to mention Nina finally slapping the taste out of Carly's mouth? See? Regardless of her flaws, I do enjoy Korte-headed episodes over CVE-headed episodes because they always seem to have more emotional resonance to long-time fans.
    • And that charity does still get mentioned from time to time. I want to say the last time was some time this year, too. 
    • Oh, no. Vernon has definitely had his moments.   Choose silence anyone?
    • Search YT for Edwyn Sanchez, he posted an AI enhanced episode of ATWT and it is beautiful.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy