Jump to content

Tyler Perry's 'Haves and Have Nots' on OWN


KMan101

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I'd actually like to hear your thoughts on it, Vee. As I've made clear, I think it's awful but in a sorta mesmerizing, brilliant way--but obviously that's not the intention, and I don't mean to belittle those on here who love it, or who have said it's a true return to vintage Y&R style daytime soap (poor Bill Bell....)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who said that? LOL

The problem with this show that I'm seeing is that the scenes don't come to their natural conclusion. So characters are stuck making a point that over and over again for no reason. Like that scene with Peter Parros and the cop, it didn't need to be that long or that repetitive. And how many times can Wyatt's parents tell him he's a useless addict? Or chastise his sponsor (or whatever) for not paying attention to him? It's operating like a daytime soap when it's not. The show is on weekly, we don't need to be told the same thing so many times.

I still think Candace and Hannah are the best of the lot. Good actors, characters with a lot of potential (though that scene with Hannah and her son in the last episode was TORTURE, why were there such long pauses between each line of their dialogue? And again it was repetitive.).

Also this show needs to work on crafting cliffhangers. Either they're not trying or they're duds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been looking for when OWN will rerun it again.

Granted I only saw a few epis of Generations but I thought that soap was awful so I hope it's not as bad a Generations.

If I can suffer through 2 epis of Hit the Floor I think I can sit through one of this.

Did they bust out those awful 80s style catfights yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've piked on you about this show (and the online ones) before tongue.png But you didn't say the vintage Y&R comparison--someone else did on here in one of the first few pages (I swear, but am too lazy to look.) On another forum, whenever anyone says anything bad about the show, a group of peple who LOOOOOOVE it reply that they are hypocrits because t's just as good as vintage Knots and Dynasty (to which I'd say vintage Knots had far more relatable and better writing and vintage Dynasty was aware of how great its camp appeal was--and both for primetime soaps looked spectacular.)

But I definitely agree with you. Between scenes going on too long and--as you mention with the Hannah and her son scene, but I find his in most of hte scenes--the pauses between each line of dialogue, even when they should be quick comebacks, Perry has zero sense of how to direct this. I think in this case he probably is striving for the sorta hypnotic way people talk on Bill Bell soaps--he has said he was obsessed with Y&R as a kid--but he's going about it all wrong, because that style doesn't mean you take a long beat between every reply.

I wonder if at one time tis was an attempt to write a daytime soap and then they decided to just invest weekly? Because the writing so far is as repetitve as Reilly's writing which, as you say, can work in a daytime soap, but it seems ridiculous to be even more repetitive than most daytime soaps when you are weekly. I do think Tika makes Candace work (she genuinely seems to boh care about Amanda genuinely and her brother and be a completely manipulative bitch, something that is more in the performance than the writing) and Hannah is good actress too, although I find her "'po' black God-fearing matriarch" who hates her demon daughter and worhips her agelic son a bit too cliche even for this genre, and John Schneider seems to realize he's playing camp and have fun with it. Mrs Potts understudy lady looks the part as Katherine but has weird line delivery--which with such weird dialogue doesn't help.

Why doesn't Wyatt just become a male model or go into porn to support his habit? :P I know super buff, hot half naked men who still have all these issues are nothing new to soaps, but I seriously get no sense of him being a heroin and everything elese long term user with no prospects who has bizarre "quirks" that the others barely blink an eye to like taking off all his clothes. Perry sorta has little quirks for each character (Amanda is sweet and dumb and look she CUTS!) and I think he thinks that makes their characters complex but otherwise they're pretty blank. And Jeffrey is beyond ridiculous (I really picture Perry telling him to lick his lips like some hungry dog when he lusts after Wyatt's body--who does that!), not even realizing that as soon as he literally turnshis back, Wyatt has gulped down every glass of champagne on the table.

I could talk about this show all day.

Edited by EricMontreal22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This is the perfect way to encapsulate the situation. So many morally-reprehensible stories were foisted on the show and its characters in ATWT's dwindling years. Rape should never be used as a cheap plot device or in a way that degrades the victim. Jack's sexual assault was another heinous example of how nasty the the show's tone had become. The fact that people like Hogan Sheffer, Ron Carlivati, Jean Passanante, Charles Pratt, Dena Higley, etc., somehow end up winning awards for their material, decimates the credibility and integrity of the awards, IMHO. Soaps used to have a solid moral core and did not originally wallow in the gutter, rolling around in filth and depravity just to be cool, hip, campy, or whatever else modern-day PTB aim for. Thank you. Cruelty, degradation and misogyny are not components which lend themselves to successful soaps, which have always been predicated on warmth, family bonds, and providing a comforting haven for their audience. The genre has been crippled because the cynical and ignorant executives in charge understand neither the shows nor what the audience wants to see.
    • Beverlee was on a whole other level from Kim. It's not like they were in competition with each other. I get the feeling that Kim had a slight problem with the super-professional, serious cast members who just wanted everyone to be prepared and do the work, as she seems to like having fun on set. (She's made a few cracks about Chris Bernau being like that). Bev was definitely one of those. But they didn't work together that much. Yeah, they made her manic and also much weaker. She always had a vulnerability, but wanting to kill herself over that guy? No way. Not only that, he didn't leave her! She insisted he marry Maeve. When they did the tribute to Bert/Charita, the compilation of scenes with her showed how much the cast had been almost totally turned over in a relatively short period of time. Nearly every shot was of her by herself because most people she had worked with had been fired, left or been replaced. I assume they couldn't show her with people who hadn't been replaced, like Don Stewart, Elvera Roussel, or Robert Newman because they would have had to pay them for using their clips. It's dreadful to watch. Like she had no connection to the current show.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A little too much focus on Chad and Cat today but I enjoyed the episode. I have a feeling that Jennifer’s gonna get dumped on though, even though I think that her anger is completely understandable and justified. And honestly, Ron is finally gone; Abigail can come back now.  But, welcome back, Anna! It was nice seeing Carrie have scenes with her mother. Christie Clark and Leann Hunley have never really had that many scenes together and to see them have them now is really nice. I’m glad that both of them were there to comfort Marlena too. Their words were definitely the thing that Marlena needed to hear. Btw, with all this talk of Noah, does it mean that he’s gonna be introduced soon? Amy, revealing that John changed her flat tire many years ago seemed a little random though. I would rather she have said something about how everybody in Salem knows of John Black because of how he was always such a hero. But at the same time, her story also showed what a great guy John was.  I liked Kate’s scenes with Philip too, and her promise to get back at Xander for what he did. And since we didn’t see JPL in the bed, did he need some time off or something? And yeah, everything involving ‘One Stormy Night’ still seems very Ron-like to me.
    • The second photo featuring the late John Spencer is from the Law & Order episode, "Prescription For Death", which was the (second) pilot/first episode all the way back in 1990! He played the father of a daughter that had gone to the ER for a mere sore throat but ended up dead because the doctor on call was drunk and had given her medication that she had an adverse reaction to, after receiving some other medication. So, he will always have that great distinction in addition to The West Wing. (The first pilot, "Everybody's Favorite Bagman", was filmed in 1988! The show was offered to CBS, but they passed. In syndication, it is oddly placed as the sixth episode of Season 1. And Roy Thinnes played DA Alfred Wentworth there. When NBC picked up the show two years later, Thinnes declined to return, and that's how we got Steven Hill's DA Adam Schiff.)
    • exactly. I can understand schadenfreude if it were real, but a lot of this is just an engineered distraction.
    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy