Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of March


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, but it's also the oh so clever way these writers write and segue their scenes--they'll have one line in one scene then basically move into a similar line in the new scene. I guess even in nursing though PC has so few gay possibilities you don'thave any choices but to crush on someone who's straight... (I mean that story angle makes sense in high school stories or other closeted ones, but...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Emma, it's time for boarding school! Used to like seeing this gorgeous little girl, but I don't need this Saprina cheerleader. And little children talking to grown folks inappropriately pisses me off. If they are going to continue with Patty and this girl, she needs to be recast. How old is this actress? Patty needs to cut it out. This is embarrassing for him! Shut up, Piph! She needs to be transferred!!!!! Saprina is ready to move on? From what?

Does anyone know Genie's final air date?

TJ, stop wasting your time!

Dante, I've been in your corner, please don't give me any more scenes like that. Kind of embarrassing jeal0002.gif

Liz. lol. Is this what she learned in nursing school? Begging Nik just a bit too much - missing those Cassadine carpet burns, huh?

FRon love bringing people back to put them in comas.

Shawn saving Anna wub.pngwub.png

Dr. O and Britta wub.pngwub.png

Between Emma understanding that boys can like boys and Bobbie wishing her son would find the perfect man and get married, this eppy should have been called General Hospital: Prop 8!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

HA! When I first skimmed this post, I thought "Oh crap, did I mention All Her Children again and not even realize it..." biggrin.png

Exactly. I actually usually enjoy or more or less agree with the posters' posts, but to go on about how you have now wathed 2 episodes in 16 years, and then basically say people who have been watching everyday are blatantly unfair or even blind to the brilliant characterization, etc, is just blink.png Obviously this style of writing makes the soaps easier to jump into than they often are, so I see why it does make a good first impression--in a way anyway. OLTL seemed to get the same praise ("I wondered what all the fuss was about so tuned back to One Life for the first time in a decade for three whole episodes and it's GREAT! Great characters, tons of mentions of names I actually remember from when I watched, bla bla bla") It doesn't show that characters have been having the same conversation for months, there's next to no character growth, the shocking surprises rarely have any real fall-out, etc.

It's not fashionable to say about soaps anymore, but really I think strong soap writing, while it needs to be accessible, has to mean that you don't have a pretty spot on glance at all the characterization and plot connections from just two episodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I skipped some of the insanity that this thread became, but I think it's pretty clear to me that the Dr O thing doesn't have to do with Faison (I still don't get how they never found and arrested her though.) Ron C loves having these henchmen/women turn up again, be connected to more characters and then be working or involved in something even bigger so I'm sure it will be a Cassadine (prob a back from the dead one for more "shock") and all these stories will in some completely nonsensical way that even the writers can't explain be tied together--from the Faison/Robin stuff, to Lulu missing, the return of the Ice Princess, etc. Cuz that's a classic umbrella story and we all love sotries that are umbrellas!


Maybe it can tie into the Relish! story too!!


I do think you're right that they definitely are trying to remind the audience that they remember Lucas is gay too, and that could be in the works, but Lucas coming back--if FV isn't scared of making the show too gay or whatever they thought One Life became--is still a ways off, I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem with GH and the problem with their OLTL is their insistence that SOMETHING!!1@!1Q13DC happen in every frickin episode. So everything is rush rush rush to get to that "moment", most of which aren't even fully followed up on. I get that there's something for everyone but with that you end up with stories that aren't fully fleshed out. The show ends up feeling like empty calories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • From what I just recently watched, they were setting her up to go into future stories. She was Emmy nomination worthy in the material I saw. If some viewers did not like her, the character could have been rehabilitated after that sick storyline. It feels like they destroyed a character for fun and then tossed her to the curb. Spencer had chemistry with everyone. I'm just retroactively angry on Spencer's behalf. 
    • CBS was back in third place in 1994/95. That was the season CBS lost NFL broadcasting rights which also cost them several established affiliates in major media markets. 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived. 1995/96 CBS was trying to be young and cool to compete with NBC and Fox, but it was an epic failure and CBS was once again in third place.
    • I tend to think that Chad will actually listen to Jen (this time). And that will be the next stumbling block in their relationship, which will open the possibilities for Cat to seek another member of their love triangle... To iterate my earlier thought, I am also not a fan of the person Melissa Reeves, but the character of Jennifer looks so chic this week, especially in comparison to Hope (and Gabi).  That blunt haircut is a winner.   
    • I think Cheryl was essentially replaced by Josie, and it seems likely that Lemay wanted to bring the Frames back into the picture and for a variety of reasons that it would be McKinnons who would make way for them. Cheryl didn't really get many layers -- she was pretty and kind and sweet and faded into the background so that Scott could participate in the AIDS storyline with Dawn. Looking at the AWHP, other than (not very) shockingly being in love with her mother's adopted son Scott, Cheryl apparently went out with Sam and flirted with much-too-old-for-her John Hudson and MJ's ex-boyfriend/pimp Chad. I know MJ told Mary that she had been a prostitute, but did she tell Cheryl and did she tell anyone about Chad's pimping?   
    • I feel the same way about Melissa Reeves' Jennifer. She just makes the show feel like home by her presence alone. I am perfectly okay with them coming in every once and awhile, which probably fits Reeves' schedule better anyway. Their connections to Salem are still there: JJ, the grandkids, Jack still owning half of The Spectator ... they're perfect recurring characters. All this talk of Jennifer being in the wrong regarding Cat is absurd. Jennifer is not being villainized in any way, shape, or form, she's just being allowed to actually be human, which adds odds to the obstacle of Chad and Cat eventually getting together. All inner conflict. Keep it coming!
    • Hahaha. Jean Hackney, Angelica Nero, and the Falcon Crest henchwomen were all straight out of a James Bond movie.
    • My hunch is what you've described. JFP is likely back working on transitioning the show to a new studio and embracing new technology for its production model.
    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
    • It's a lesson to never be loyal because once your use is up, you're shown the door. MSW was the only bright spot for CBS for awhile, and once they were back on top... they promptly sabotaged the show as a repayment for all that the show had done for the network.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy