Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Frankly, John, what difference does it make WHAT Cady McClain thinks? She's probably happy just to be working.

So Dixie had JR when she was fourteen? Way to go, Adam! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well there have been actors that put it in their deals they cant be Grannies. So If Cady is cool, why all the fuss over it. She is the one who has to make it believable. If she can sell it. Thats all that matters iMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cady could be down with anything in regards to Dixie. That's irrelevant to me. What is not irrelevant, however, and what shouldn't be to PP and the show is viewers' acceptance, or lack thereof, of the situation.

You know, it wasn't SO long ago that post-ers here complained about SORAS'ing, something which I called a "necessary evil." Yet, for some magical reason, it's totes okay now. Interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, that's not fair to Cady. She could be the best actress ever to grace stage, screen or computer but it's not her fault if when viewers look at her they don't see how she could be the mother to Bittle or grandmother to Nelsen. It has nothing to do with acting, it has to do with what people see when they look at the screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always saw why you felt the time jump was wrong. Personally, I had no problem with concept of a time jump but I thought 5 years was a bit much.

Both shows have burdens to deal with. AMC has to manage the 5 year jump while OLTL chose to operate in "real" time but remain shackled to RC's work on OLTL and GH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm fine with the time jump. It does what it needs to do for the kids and clearing the decks, but it is fluid enough to allow for OLTL and AMC to cross over in future if they so choose.

As for J.R. and A.J. re: Cady, that was going to happen sooner or later. JY already looked too old, and A.J. was only a year or two away from SORAS himself. At this point anyone who doesn't just accept that she got knocked up real young and go with it was never going to take the ride at AMC anyway. It's just not that serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont feel the time jump was necesary. The kids were born in 2003. W/O SORASing, they'd be 9 now. Having them be 15 for teen stories, isnt really that drastic considering other soap SORASING. They would have skipped the pre-teen years but we'd just have to have assumed that happened in the near 2 year gap.

And really they only jumped 3 years in the future. 5 years is emphasized and stressed but they actually jumped 3 years ahead. Time didnt stop when it went off the air. The show is only 3 years ahead of where it should have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know you did, marceline. That statement was for the "room" in general. :)

I'm not saying AMC needed to pick up exactly where they left off. But I do think they would have been better off keeping in "real time," meaning 2013, along with OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Look at what John has suggested up-thread, though. In order to accept JR as Dixie's son, we have to accept or assume that Adam knocked her up when she was between twelve and fourteen. IMO, there are enough strikes against Adam already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Brooke clinging on Ridge was cringe. Yet Ridge could've reminded Brooke + Katie that he's with Taylor and happy, so he's just as pathetic. Maybe they are destined. Yet another call out to Liam's mom. By November sweeps unknown twin Linus will be in LA.  
    • Saw this posted on IG a few days ago:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • 5-16   At last....AMANDA!!!   And I had mixed feelings tbh.   So we are back to this again? And by this I meant Sharon/Nick/Giggly Heffa. While I liked everyone looked good (you better wear those high heels, SC!!!!), been there, done that. I liked that Sharon and Phyllis came to some truce right before Sharon and Nick went off to London. It would have been nice and creepy to watch them bond and Phyllis take an unhealthy attachment to her new friendship with Sharon due to her PTSD. So I'm sorry to see that fall to the wayside.   Meanwhile, I would like to think that now that Amanda has shown up as Dumas's lawyer that it meant that soon we will get that Dumas reveal. I'm happy to see MM. However, like Lily, Devon, and Nate, I too was not liking the wordplay she was playing.   Meh. at Sally babying Billy. I did like Nick calling him out.   Well they do exist. So I wouldn't be surprised. 
    • Hm. I just realized that Dani/Andre feel like the main B plot this week. And I'm not at all complaining about that. I just figured it would be Doug/Joey/Vanessa storyline, but there is one last week in this month so perhaps that is just going to be a C plot until next week.    
    • Thanks for starting this thread!  I was hoping others were listening and would want to chat about it. I'm really enjoying Montecito!  The production and audio values are top notch. The storylines are interesting and keep me wanting more.  There is corporation succession, cheating, alcoholism, bisexual relationships, divorced parents, brother/sister drama, scorned mother, father/son relationship issues, etc. At first I couldn't stand Mena's (sp?) voice, but I've grown to enjoy her and I love to hate her as a villain. I keep hearing Smitty (BTG) in Mike Manning's voice, so it keeps throwing me haha. The only thing going against it is one episode per week, at only 18 minutes long, so we need more content. Anyone else listening and enjoying it?
    • This, plus they nixed their overnight set crew during the COVID era and never brought them back.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I did some research because I had a similar question. (also, I don't want to poop on your joke which was amusing, but it sent me down a rabbit hole) A Reddit user who works at TeleVision City (where Y&R is filmed) estimated it takes 45 minutes to set up or reconstruct an already built set.  However, according to union rules, it takes at least seven crew members (not counting lighting and sound installation).  As always, the real cost is the labor, not the task.   Y&R uses robotic cameras, so there is only a skeleton crew on set.  Most of their crew budget goes to production assistants, who cannot move sets.  So, they would need to hire a crew every time they wanted to put up or take down a set (for two days) as well as a lighting and sound design installation.  Which is obviously very different from how production worked when money was more freely spent (and good for the unions for keeping the workplace safe). So, filming a single day in Lauren and Michael's living room could cost as much as they spend on two actors salaries for an entire year.
    • I knew Giovanni Mazza was talented but damn that kid is a star in the making. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy