Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

A poster upthread called this particular case of SORAS "disturbing" and a "joke," which I think is overblown because this isn't the first time SORAS has looked absolutely silly because of the appearances of the involved actors. Examples have been given. Once again, I hate SORASing. I've never seen the point of it, ever, and I wish it didn't exist. I wish Agnes or Bill or Claire on SOMEONE had put their foot down when creating a new soap and said "On this show, the children will age naturally." Alas, that never happened, and here we are. I've learned to just accept that it will happen on all soaps, sometimes in the most ridiculous of ways.

BUT, my main problem here is that because I am not seeing a big deal about this particular case of SORASing, I was labeled as "trying to convince others that everything is perfect in the PP soaps." The PP soaps didn't invent SORAS, so I fail to see why this is being interpreted as a Prospect Park problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, Claire did. For at least the first 10 years, I think, RYAN'S HOPE had a strict policy about not SORASing and instead allowing the children - John Reid, Ryan Fenelli, etc. - to age in real time. Unfortunately, by the time Joe Hardy had become EP, that policy was overlooked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If I came across that way to you, AMS, then I apologize. I wasn't directing that or any similar comments toward you specifically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right, which is something I always forget because they eventually did muck that up and have that obnoxious Johnno recast. Of course, it illustrated my anti-SORAS sentiments. The writers got bored with the characters they had, wanted to write new/younger characters, so they cashed in the 10-year-olds and brought in 20-year-olds.

But of course, that's related to another one of marceline's (and mine) soap pet peeves. Instead of just introducing new characters and slowly tying them in with the existing characters, they were stuck on The Almighty Core.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

FWIW, I don't look at this as being PP's problem. Somebody -- Agnes, Marlene, Ginger, somebody -- should have nixed the idea as soon as it was brought up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like it, I think some are just too hung up on it. It's done nothing's going to change it at this point lol.

LOL tongue.png

I think it's funny that alot of the same people who don't like this SORAS have NO problem with Liza being deSORASed. I think this more believable than believing Adam was married to JL's Liza or that her Liza was in high school with Jesse/Angie and Tad in the early 80's. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What idea? A.J. and Miranda being SORASed?

That was as obvious as the nose on my face, and I got a big [!@#$%^&*] nose. Of course they (and Pete, and Angie's daughter) are the teen leads for the new generation. Anything else would be weak tea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Recent Posts

    • All we need now is tge Nina Drew sex to come out
    • I agree there was a lot more room for nuance in writing and performance, which will be an issue after this big reveal where you can get away with it. Hopefully Dominic will be able to bring out some good performances from him if the writing and directing allows.
    • I'm loving this whole Jacob/Derek talk. They should have had more talks like this. 
    • I keep wondering where Ted’s balls went with this recast. They’re the same character in name only at this point.
    • Oooo Kat playing the tape for Nicole and NuTed!!! And I like this discussion between NuTed and Nicole. Play them beats in this. At least, NuTed is coming through with common sense.   Wow...Silk Press Sheila really is delulu.   Nice to have the reminder that Derek and Ashley have been dating for TWO years.    DEAD at nasty a$$ chair.
    • I thought he did quite a good job. I just think it could've been quieter in delivery. He was far from 2000s Jacob Young though. (And before anyone tries it let's be clear: For years JY did not get better as an actor, he just got much Louder. He only improved further down the road.)
    • The violin smashing was ridiculous but ridiculous in one of those soap moment ways I could enjoy as an end to a dramatic reveal. (admittedly my expectations are at rock bottom with the show in terms of drama so I do think you're right to point out the OTT nature) The clash with Lulu and Brook Lyn has potential if they allow Brook Lyn to get dirty. 
    • They might be doing that until they get a clothing budget for wardrobe that fits Keith.  It has happened a couple of times on the other shows. Louise Shaffer in an interview said that she took over from another actress on SFT back in the 60s and wore only one or two items of clothing for a few weeks because the budget for new wardrobe hadn't come available/approved.    I do agree that Maurice played Ted as more cocky/suave.. and aggressive when opposite SPS (Leslie/Dana)... and maybe the show figured a more sedate/remorseful Ted was what the show was looking for.
    • A combined YR/BB party for Don Diamont  https://www.instagram.com/p/DJ7ua-oyuvI/ lauralee_bell Congrats @dondiamont on your 40 years in Daytime!! From Brad on @youngandrestlesscbs to Bill on @boldandbeautifulcbs you are so loved on and off camera! Today was super special and you so deserve it!! To many more!

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • A combined YR/BB party for Don Diamont  https://www.instagram.com/p/DJ7ua-oyuvI/ lauralee_bell Congrats @dondiamont on your 40 years in Daytime!! From Brad on @youngandrestlesscbs to Bill on @boldandbeautifulcbs you are so loved on and off camera! Today was super special and you so deserve it!! To many more!

      Please register in order to view this content

             
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy