Jump to content

2012: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

For all intents and purposes, Ann Marcus was KNOTS' head writer during the latter half of s13 as well as all of s14. Lisa Seidman was just one of the writers on her team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 458
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

To be fair, he was the Script Editor on Hollywood Heights, which was a rushed production on a similar cutthroat production timeline as most daytime soaps (even if it was only 80 episodes).

The results are to be seen, but I thought Milstein did a terrible job editing this show, not that it was all her fault though. Everything was so inconsistent and all over the place, and characters never had a unique voice from day to day.

I assume most contract cycles aren't up yet, which is why Griffith isn't firing and adding too many people all at once and is taking his time like Carlivati did earlier in the year at GH. Then again, it seemed like Tomin and Whitesell fired everyone and their mother within 5 minutes of being re-hired at DAYS, but DAYS has never played it safe when it comes to contract cycles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Script editing for a soap is very different than writing scripts or breakdowns. A topnotch script editor needs to be very familiar with the show's history, especially a soap like Y&R that still has a number of characters rooted in the early years of the show. A really knowledgable script editor can play lines of subtext, bring rich backstory to enhance current story, give a nod to past story and relationships, etc. It's not just about editing the daily scripts and catching inconsistencies. Mr. Boyd seems like a "friend of Josh and Jill" choice to me. Perhaps he would be better suited for scripts or breakdowns, but not script editing, certainly not that this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The editing was noticeably bad at times. Scenes ended abruptly and the most glaring one was when they Max appeared to be in two different locations at the same time (in the club next to Nora and in the back talking to Chloe).

I do think that if Brent Boyd learns the show's history and speaks to the cast about their characters so he can "learn them," so to speak, that he should do better than with HH. He may be better off with established characters since he only needs to build on them as opposed to building them from scratch which seems to be a weakness. The strengths of the show seemed to be the formation of romantic relationships which actually gave the illusion that there were more to some of the characters than was the case.

Even though I know I'm ultra picky, my biggest gripe was the fact that he chose not to eliminate the Chloe killed Eddie's mother plot from the show. Without it, Chloe would have been a character and not become a caricature. It was too glaringly ridiculous to have a killer blaming the son of the woman she killed for not forgiving her for cheating on him, setting out to win him back, and subsequently blaming him for ruining her life. Since her only punishment was to end up without a man then the cheating was all that was needed. Otherwise, rational viewers who weren't starry eyed shippers would want to see her in handcuffs and on her way to prison at the end--which of course, did not happen. They do have Phyllis and others who never pay so maybe this is right up his alley.

How he handles recasts and new characters will tell whether the issues with HH had more to do with him (outside of some of the terrible acting, the low wardrobe budget that affected Jake the most, and poor editing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

The credits on Friday's US episode of Y&R differs from the script Muhney posted. MAB is still listed as EP - JFP wasn't listed. Writing credits goes:

Griffith

MAB

Sheffer

Hamner

NMS

Kanelos

Boyd

Milsten

Cwikly

JFE

I don't know how to list this. Do I list Boyd as Co-script editor? Josh and MAB as Co-HWs? I hate confusing credits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Garneau was in the Liberal party and his riding was in Montreal. He was the first Canadian in outer space.
    • I agree. I really have enjoyed this story from the beginning. I feel like it needed the time for us to care about Doug. They've done a nice job of explaining his motives and making me care for him. I still feel like he's doomed and Vanessa will end up being a widow and now I'm invested in that *not* happening now that I've fallen for him. Friday was good but so was the entire week. I think they're doing such a nice job of keeping things moving. We got good movement with Bill's story this week, Chelsea is attempting to date, Andre and Dani are having tough conversations about their relationship, of course Anita reunited with Sharon. There is *so* much going on and I didn't even cover all of it.  I wish all of the soaps would take a page out of BTG book and start rotating their stories. I love that everybody is getting a chance to shine and they don't just sit on one lead story to the point you get sick of it. 
    • Did Jordan Clarke have a departure sometime between 1985 and 1989? I know Robert Newman had three runs: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end.
    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy